Never miss an update

2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754

Item specifics

: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Year: 2001
Style: Basketball Shoes Product Line: Nike Air
US Shoe Size (Men's): 13 Brand: Nike
Color: Blue
Never miss an update

2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754 -

    2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754
    2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754
    Man's/Woman's JORDAN TRUE FLIGHT MENS Sneakers 342964-104 Clever and practical Elegant and sturdy packaging Excellent stretching , Nike AIR ZOOM SPIRIDON '16 Mens Sneaker 926955-003 MSRP:$160Gentleman/Lady VANS × SYNDICATE Reasonable price Orders are welcome Current shape , $280 New Balance 998 Made In USA M998XAD Men Size 6 Leather Camo Military NewNew Nike Men's Air Max 1 Leather Shoes (654466-102) Men US 11.5 / Eur 45.5 , NikeLab Flyknit Streak - CHOOSE SIZE - 904711-400 Navy Lab Purple Grey Gray , Nike Metcon 4 sz 11 Ah7453 003 trainer crossfit shoes runningNEW AUTHENTIC MEN'S FILA ORIGINAL FITNES PREMIUM 1vf80146-400 , K SWISS Gary Vee 003 Clouds and Dirt Men’s Size 12NEW NIKE LEBRON SOLDIER XI SHOES MENS SZ 14 897644 007 LEBRON JAMES RARE SIZE!! , New Nike LEBRON Soldier 10 SFG Lux Men's Basketball Shoes Light Bone 911306 001Indiana University Hoosiers Shoes Adidas Gameday Team Issued Edition Mens Sz 12Merrell Mens Trail Glove 4 Knit Shoes Trainers Sneakers blue grey Sports size 9NEW Nike Lab Air Shake NDestrukt x Pigalle Loyal Blue Royal AA4315 400 SZ 10-13Saucony Hurricane ISO 4 Size US 10.5 M (D) Men's Running Shoes S20411-2[309434-014] Nike Air Diamond Turf Black White Oreo Men Sneakers Sz 10 Deion DTVintage New Adidas Originals Super Star Navy Blue Suede Shoes Sneakers Size US10 , New! Vivobarefoot Primus Trail M Running Shoes. PBT Red Yellow. US 9Reebok CrossFit NANO 7 Men's Training Shoes BS7728Men’s Nike Air Max BW Violet Big Window Retro 1991 Bubble 10 Black White Air , Nike SB Stefan Janoski Max air men lifestyle sneakers NEW black grey 631303-020 , Reebok x Size Revenge Plus Vintage NIB Mens Sz 12 Charming Pink CM9872 , New 2009 NIKE ZOOM HYPERFUSE BLACK RED Mens 9 Basketball Sneakers 407622 007(B37367) MEN'S ADIDAS ORIGINALS POD-S3.1 WHITE *NEW*Size 11.5 ADIDAS EQT SUPPORT 93/17 CORE BLACK running NEW ultra boost nmd r1 r2Men’s New Balance 990 V4 8.5 US D Excellent Condition Black , Nike Air Jordan 31 XXXI Shattered Backboard Black Starfish 845037-021 $185 , 29 New Mens Nike Air Jordan True Flight Basketball Shoes 342964 104 Size 9.5 -11Man's/Woman's JORDAN SPIZIKE Mens Sneaker 315371-406 MSRP:$175 Reliable quality New products in 2018 Very good classification
    2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754 ->2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754 -
    Frye Molly Button Knee High Boots Riding Tall Equestrian Zipper Booties 8.5Tony Lama Women's Vaquero CLIFFROSE Western Cowboy Boots VF6007SUPER SEXY!!! ALICE + OLIVIA 'Halle' HI HEEL GRAY SUEDE OVER THE KNEE BOOTS 10RICK OWENS NEW $964US Black Textured Leather Spike Heel Ankle Zip Boots 38.5IT , Aquatalia Geena Black Leather Bootie Size 5 , VANS MAN SNEAKER SHOES CASUAL CODE SK8-HI REISSUE ZIP VN0004KYJUV - VN0004KYJUW , nike marxman mens hi top trainers 832764 600 sneakers shoesAdidas ultra boost 3.0 woman us size8Yellow Box Womens Warm Closed Toe, Silver, Size 7.0 US / 5 UKKennel und Schmenger Womens Big Trainers, Beige OmbraBlauOcean Sohle Creme 2Womens Office Amuse Western Flat Boots BURGUNDY LEATHER Boots , Man/Woman Ladies Padders Flute Casual Loafers Queensland Price reduction Tide shoes listTABOO-709 7 1/2" SEXY CLASSIC ANKLE STRAP EXOTIC POLE DANCE PLATFORM SANDAL , Fashion Women's Peep Toe Rhionestone Platform Wedge Heels Sandals Shoes US Size , NEW Geox D Amelia women's brown suede wedge shoes 9 M $160 , MARINA RINALDI Women's Black Lea Bow Detail Heels US 11 / IT 41 $495 NEWNew Valentino 'Vitello' Studded Sandal Size 36EU or 6 US $1395+ , New FITFLOP Halo Toe Thong Leather Sandals - Taupe Snake (F0030 0218) - Size 9Gentlemen/Ladies Adidas Men's Alphabounce RC - B42652 Strong heat and wear resistance Attractive fashion Cheap orderMens Nike Zoom Live TB Promo 902590-100 White/Metallic Silver Brand New Sz 11.5 , Asics Gel Lyte V 5 Taos Taupe Tan Brown Running Shoes New Men Achieve HL7A1-0707 , adidas Men's Pro Model, White/Super Purple/Gold Metallic, 8.5 M USP.W TENNIS RUNNING SHOES - ROYAL BLUE; TACROSEpaulet Men's Boots 9.5 D Sewn by Hand Blue Vibram Sole 23387 2757 , New Clarks Tan Leather Slip-On Men's Loafer Shoes size 9 M-15770New adidas Originals CLIMACOOL 1 SHOES Core Black Triple Blackout Mens BA8582 , Nike Kawa Slide Womens Style : 834588 HYPER PUNCH/BLACK-WHITE Womens Size 11Mint ASICS Dynaflyte 2 Black Magenta Blue fade Womens 10 42 Running Shoes , New Balance WS574SND B Green White Women Running Shoes Sneakers WS574SNDB , Dolce Vita Thigh High Boot 6 1/2 Great Condition ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    2001 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI I Royal Black Chicago Blue mogochinese-28954 136066 041 Size 13 Bred Chicago XI 413b754
    Athletic Shoes