Never miss an update

Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c

Item specifics

: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Barney's NY / Co-Op
Country of Manufacture: Italy Style: Fashion - Ankle
Shoes - Insole Length: 9.25" to tip of toe US Shoe Size (Women's): 6 1/2
Shoes - Exterior Sole Length: 10" Width: Medium (B, M)
shoes_width_footbed: 3" Color: Beige
shoes_boots_height: 3.25" cuffed, 4.75" uncuffed Heel Height: High (3 in. to 4.5 in.)
Shoes - Exact Heel Height: 3.5" Pattern: Solid
womens_shoes_platform: n/a UPC: Does Not Apply
Never miss an update

Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c -

    Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c
    Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c
    I35 Fedee Harness Strap Riding Boots 805, Cognac, 7.5 USVionic Orthaheel Taber Grey Snake Leather Orthotic Ankle Boots 7.5 38.5 NEWSkechers 48816 Womens DLites-Chalet Faux Fur Collar Winter Boot , Womens Pieced Genuine Leather Over the Knee Boots Military Low Heel Suede ShoesUrban Glitter Blue Rhinestones Winter Ankle Sexy Boot Size 8 , New Womens Over The Knee Thigh Boots Block Low Hee Pointed Faux Suede Shoes , Nine West Women's Nolynn Cognac Leather Ankle Boot , $129 BASS Leather Knee High Boots 7M Shoes Winter Comfy Women Lady Youth Gift BR , ALDO  Jelly Mid Calf Brown,  Boots BRAND NEW, never worn.  Size 6 , CLARKS 62736 WOMEN'S INGALLS NILE BLACK LEATHER ANKLE BOOTS SIZE 10M NEW IN BOXNew Women Real Cow Leather Flat Heel Ankle Boots Pull On Over Knee Thigh Boot , Womens SAM EDELMAN LOUIE tan / gray suede ankle boots sz. 6 M $130Womens Pointed Toe Stilettos High Heels Thigh High Boots Slim Sexy Sequins ShoesANTHROPOLOGIE FREE PEOPLE RUST SUEDE FAIRFAX HEELED BOOTIES BOOTS US 9Elizabeth And James Womens E-Heidi Zip Knee-High BootWomens Sexy Pleated Long Back Zip Stilettos High Heel Over Knee Thigh Boot Shoes , VINTAGE HUARACHE WOVEN LEATHER WESTERN SHOES SOUTHWESTERN ANKLE COWBOY BOOTS 8.5 , CLARKS Women's Wilrose Glen Mary Jane Flat - Choose SZ/color , Under Armour Waterproof Boots Govie Pull-On Women's SMS Sample Size 7 Green , NEW JUICY COUTURE Laura Animal-Print Brown Suede Boot Sz 8 M NEW $325MARTINO POLAR Black Waterproof Winter Boots Women's 8.5 NEW IN BOXNew Womens Leather Fold Over Knee High Boots Wedge Heel Fold Over Boots Shoes , Devious 5.25" Shiny Black Stretch Platform Thigh Boots Goth Fetish Trans 6-16Hot sale Autumn new women high-quality 3 color Shoe of sponge cake size:34-41Cobb Hill Women's Abilene Boot Black 8.5W , MARTINO ANGIE Black Suede Waterproof Pull On BOOTS Womens 7.5 NEW IN BOXLauren by Ralph Lauren ~ Devona Women's Fashion Boots $230 NIBMarc Fisher Suede Chelsea Ankle Boots Ignite Grey Size US 7.5M QQ37OZARK TRAIL LEATHER & RUBBER WOMEN'S SIZE 9 THINSULATE LINED WINTER SNOW BOOTS ,
    Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c ->Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c -
    Women Spring Step L'Artiste Burbank Natural Leather Slip on Shoe Size 38 Eur , COLE HAAN Womens Black Leather Ballet Flats Sz 6.5 B - 232453 , Womens Ladies Shoes Slip On Pointed Toe Colorful Printing Pointy Shoes NEW , J. Crew Roxie Ankle-Cuff Tassel Pumps, Size 6.5 , $890 MIU MIU Red Suede Mary Jane Crystal Embellished Ballerina Flats 36 / 6 , New Fashion Womens Buckle Rivet Low Heel Slip On Loafers Pumps Shoes 2017 Spring , PLEASER Kiss-280 6" Heel Sexy Exotic Platform PumpWomen Pointy Toe Comfort Formal Casual Chunky High Heels Shoes Strap Lady PumpsDolce & Gabbana Womens Shoes Size 38 8 Off White Pumps Pointed Toe HeelsJimmy Choo Romy 100mm Coarse Glitter Pointed-Toe Pump Size: 7B / 37EUGeox Carmen Gold Womens Shoes Size 8.5 M Sandals MSRP $365 , Adidas BZ0496 Men NIZZA LO Casual shoes white sneakersNike Hyperlive Men's Basketball Shoe 819663 170 Size 10.5 , Nike Air Pippen 1 Wheat 325001-700 Men's Basketball Sneakers 11 (New) , Nike Men Air Jordan XXXII 32 Low PF Win Like 82 Shoes AH3347-021 US7-11 04' , Nike Air Vapormax Run Utility Black Reflect Silver Mens Running Shoes AQ8810-001 , men camouflage outwear thicken fur lined mid calf sknow boots platform warm shoeJordan Retro 12 XII OVO - Black-Metallic Gold - Near Dead Stock - SZ-9.5 - AUTH , Mr/Ms Rocky AlphaForce Oxford Shoe Complete specification Order welcome Immediate delivery , Puma Safety 643025 Mens Aerial Low EH Composite Toe Work ShoesMen’s Stuart McGuire Black Tassel Loafer Size 9 ½ D , BT245 ARMANI JEANS shoes blue suede men elegant , Nike Wmns Roshe One HYP BR Hyperfuse Breathe Pink Blast Women Shoes 833826-600Wmns Nike Air Force 1 07 SE / PRM / QS AF1 Women Shoes Classic Sneakers Pick 1 , NEW Nike Total Core TR 2 Womens Mesh Sneakers Shoes running training blue yellowNike Air Huarache Womens 917692-001 Silver Marina Blue Running Shoes Size 9.5Puma Fenty by Rihanna Bow Sneaker Pink Silver 365054-01 Women's Size 7-9 , Skechers Rumblers - Beam Me Up Black Blk Womens Wedge Boot Size 6.5M , Women's Fur Lining Fleece Over Knee boots high Block Heel Pointed Toe Shoes US10White Mountain Tomi Over The Knee Snow Boots, Cognac ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Barneys New York Co-Op Ankle Co-Op Boot mogochinese-28539 V-Front Suede Taupe Taupe Size 36.5 f1bcb0c