Never miss an update

Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Super Clean Adidas Womens Size 10 Mens Size 9 Stan Smith Flower Floral Print.
Brand: adidas UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 8.5
Width: Medium (B, M) EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 42.5
Color: Blue/Red/White Material: Canvas
Pattern: Floral Features: Lace-Up
Product Line: adidas Stan Smith Shoe Height: Low Top
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 10 Sub Style: Fashion, Style
Style: Athletic Sneakers
Never miss an update

Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa - blurrypron.com

    Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa
    Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa
    Skechers Womens Go Run Mojo Verve Lightweight Cushioned Trainer Shoes , Hoka One One Womens Arahi Athletic Cross-Training Running Shoes Size 8 , Adidas NMD R2 PK W SIze 10 Womens Pink Black Primeknit Shoe BY9521 , NIKE SON OF FORCE MID Size 36,5 (4Y)Puma X Sophia Webster Pearl Cage Graphic - Multi - WomensKEEN Targhee II 2 Low WP Waterproof US 8 Hiking Trail Shoes , SALEWA FIRETAIL 3 APPROACH TRAIL HIKING SHOES WOMEN'S 8.5 M $139New Balance Women Size 6.5 NB 574 Lifestyle Navy Grey Athletic Sneakers Shoes , Adidas Boost Supernova ST Women's Size 8.5 Black Grey White BB3505 , ZARA WOMAN 18 CONTRASTING FLATFORM SNEAKERS SHOES 1419/301adidas Originals Women's Stan Smith Sneakers - Size 10.5 / Color Crystal White , Skechers Women's Go Vulc 2 Walking Shoe, Gray, Size 7.5Nike Women's Metcon 3 Athletic Snickers Running Training Shoes Size US 10adidas Originals Women’s Superstar 80s NEW Size 10 Shell Toes Art BY9635 Blackadidas Crazymove CF W Black White Women Cross Training Shoes Sneakers AQ1974Sneakers and Athletic G by GUESS Banx2 White/Gold/Gold , Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Looney Tunes Pepe Le Pew Shoes , Reebok Women's Free Style Hi Black 71 Brand New In Box , NEW Nike Women's Air Force 1 AF1 Flyknit Shoes Black White 818018 002 Size 8 8.5 , Womens Converse Chuck Taylor All Star OX Low Sneaker- Parchement Natural - 7.5US , $129 LL Bean Women's Carrabassett Snow Boot Tall - Size 7.5(M) - Pewter - NIBNWT JSLIDES J SLIDES NYC ASTOR BLING STAR NAVY BLUE SATIN PLATFORM SNEAKER 8.5 MFrankie Stern Silver Lizard Print Slip On Sneaker Size 40Women's nike flex 2014 RN size 11 us Running, Cross Training new with boxWomen's Black Nike Air Force 1 Shoes w/Velcro Size 8.5 (334031-003) (W-41) , ASICS Women's GT-1000 6 Porcelain Blue/S-Blue/White Running Shoes - Size 10 NWBADIDAS YATRA 85 42 42.5 NEW originals adizero sleek trainer samba spezialScholl Orthaheel Empire Womens Comfortable Supportive Active ShoesSUPER RARE Nike Shox Vital Women's Sneakers 325019-090 Black Leather Size 10
    Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa - blurrypron.com>Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa - blurrypron.com
    NIB! $295 FREEBIRD BY STEVEN 'BOWIE' LEATHER ANKLE BOOT RUST SZ 9Asics Gel-DS Trainer 22 Prime Red Black Gold Men Running Shoe Sneaker T720N-2390ASICS P325.0122 GEL-ADVANCE MENS CRICKET SHOE 8.5USStuart Weitzman New Dunkirk Black Womens Shoes Size 6 M Boots MSRP $798 , New Mollini Omolli Womens Shoes Casual Sneakers Casual , Ladies Clarks Fringe Trim Loafer Flats 'Andora Crush' , LUCIANO BARACHINI women's shoes sandals liu jewel court shoes heel jo ceremony , BCBGMAXAZRIA Leather Wedge Sandal in Wine Size: 37 EURNine West Women's Freddius Leather Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorSalvatore Ferragamo Size 9.5 Womens Clear Jelly Butterfly Sandal Comfort FlatAlaia Womens Blue Ankle Strap Wedge SandalRetail $950 Prada White Studded Leather Ankle-Strap Sandals Sz 39/9 , VANS Sk8 Hi Reissue Zip (Hiking) Black/Gum High Top Skate WOMEN'S 8.5Vans Men's Shoes "Sk8-Hi Reissue" -- (Dirty Bird) PWTR/True WhtAdidas Originals Swift Run Black White Grey INIKI NMD CQ2114 Mens 8-13 , Nike 843392-610 Zoom KD9 University Red White Black Kevin Durant Men Shoes Sz 12 , NIKE 1988 AIR JORDAN III 3 WHITE FIRE RED ORIGINAL xi OG iv RARE UNWORN COMPLETE , Sperry 0195214W : Top-Sider Men's Authentic Original Amaretto Boat ShoesSalvatore Ferragamo Nelo Braided bit loafer Men's shoe Size 7.5 2E Black NewSkechers 15633 Performance Womens Go Walk Joy- Sneaker- Choose SZ/Color.Christian Audigier Stact Skulls & Roses Leather Sneakers Sz 7 M NIB MSRP $159.99Aerosoles Women's Flower Thong Sandal Coral Faux Patent Comfort ShoesMIA Women's Margaret Fashion Sneaker, Blush, 6.5 M USNew Women's New Balance 1400 Storm Blue Classic Gunmetal Suede USA Size 5.5Birkenstock Women's Gizeh Oiled Leather Tobacco Oiled , WMNS PUMA BASKET HEART DENIM HALOGEN BLUE WOMEN'S SELECT YOUR SIZENike Air Vapormax Flyknit 2 Womens 942843-008 Grey Pink Running Shoes Size 6.5Tommy Hilfiger Womens Rustee 2" Closed Toe Ankle Cold, Olive Pu, Size 10.0Blowfish San Fran Tobacco Rustic Womens Ankle Boot Size 7.5M , Tory Burch Renault Suede Brown Snake Embossed High Heel Bootie sz 9.5
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Adidas Stan Smith Stan Womens Size 10 29987 Farm Adidas Chita Floral Tennis Shoes BB5158 8f39baa
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;