Never miss an update

Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Fastening: Lace Up
Width: Medium (B, M) Style: Fashion Sneakers
Pattern: 749263 001 US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7
Color: DARK GRAY/GUM Material: Suede
Brand: Nike UPC: 888409685642
Never miss an update

Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed -

    Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed
    Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed
    NIKE ROSHE ONE 511882 094 WOMEN'S RUNNING SHOES BLCK-WHT-MTLLC PLATINUM SIZE 9 , Brooks Ravenna 8 Black Blue Aquarius US 8 running shoes , Brand New W Air Presto 878068-803 Guava Ice Size 8 WomensWMNS Nike Epic React Flyknit Wolf Grey AQ0070-002 Size 6-11 LIMITEDAllrounder by Mephisto Women's Darina Walking ShoeNIB Brooks 120247 465 Women's Glycerin 15 Evening Blue/Purple Cactus Flower/Teal , Nike Womens Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Shoes 942855 003 Black/Oil Grey/Gunsmoke/Wht 8.5 , Nike metcon 2 women's New in Box , HOKA ONE ONE MACH BLUEBIRD/ WHITE RUNNING SHOES, WOMEN US 8/ ~NEW , WOMENS ASICS GEL - NIMBUS 17 in colors ONYX / PURPLE / MINT SIZE 6Nike Womens Free RN Flyknit 2018 Shoes 942839 401 Squadron Blue/Platinum Sz 8.5 , Ted Baker London Cepa Sneaker Dark Grey Size 6 US New , NIB Bling Rhinestone Nike Flex Trainer 4 Black Pink Sneakers Stylish Custom 11Nike Air Max 90 HYP QS Milan Hyper Orange/Chilling Red 813151-800 WMNS US 5.5-8NEW ~ rag & bone Women’s RB1 Low Leather Sneakers Off White 9.5US 39.5EU $325 , HOKA ONE ONE Women's TOR TECH MID WP SHOES Peacoat / Plum Purple 1012059 size 7 , Womens Nike Air Max 1 Ultra Flyknit Black Anthracite White wmns 90 95 859517 001Asics Gel Kayano 25 Size US 8.5 M (B) Women's Running Shoes Gray 1012A026Brand New Saucony Freedom Iso Unisex Road Running Shoe White Size 6 Men/ 7 WomanNike Air Zoom Mariah Flyknit Racer PRM Women’s Size 8 Platinum/White 917658-001 , Nike Air Max 2014 Running Shoes White/Black/Volt 621078-100 Women’s Size 7.5 , Nike Women's Air Huarache Run Print Fashion SneakersNIKE AIR HUARACHE CITY CASUAL WOMENS SHOES WHITE GREY BLUE CRIMSON 5 - 14.5New Balance Women's Leather Walking #WW928WB3 White/Blue Medium (B) & 2E WideASICS Gel-Quantum 360 CM Womens Size: 7.5M Color: Blue / White / Coral RETURN!Nike Zoom All Out Low 2 Women's Running Shoes White Black AJ0036 100 Size 7 - 10 , WMNS NIKE AIR MAX 95 ID PURE PLATINUM/WHITE-GREY SZ 8.5=MNS.SZ.7 (818593-996)ASICS Gel-Contend 3 Mens Size: 8M Color: Onyx / Snow / Racing Red RETURN set 1 , 2018 WMNS Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High SOH SZ 6.5 Hydrogen Blue OG AO1847-445
    Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed ->Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed -
    Bed Stu Women's Craven Black Driftwood Ankle Boot 8M , Ariat Women's Workhog H2O Work Boot Aged Bark/Topaz 7.5 M USBeverly Feldman Hunt black & Brown leather riding boots Size 8Cordani Faith Womens Boot /- Choose SZ/Color. , Skechers You - Beginning [14975BKW] Women Walking Slip-On Shoes Black/WhiteNew! AGL Perforated Beige Leather Oxford Loafer Wingtip Shoes 39, US 9 , Drew Women's Orchid Black Nubuck Comfort ShoesNew C. WONDER Size 8.5 C Wide CARLOTTA Fox Face Flats Loafers Shoes 8 1/2 , Salvatore Ferragamo Black Patent Leather Shoe Size US 6 1/2 B 6.5 Low Heel ItalySexy Pleaser 6" rhinestone clubwear dual platform boots , CHAUSSURES ESCARPINS CELINE - TAILLE 37 - BEG - , Ancient Greek Sandals Amaryllis Stones Leather Sandal, 40Under Armour Heater Mid ST Baseball Cleats 1248197-020 Sz 12.5 Grey Black Mens , Gentlemen/Ladies Mens Vans sk8 Hi service Quality and quantity guaranteed Excellent stretching , Saucony Hurricane ISO 3 Men's Mesh Training Running Everun ISOFit Road Shoes , Skechers Men's Relaxed Fit Harper Forde Loafer BlackNike 831958 Mens Mercurial Vapor XI Firm Ground Low Top Soccer Cleats Shoesadidas Golf Mens Adipower Bounce WD Carbon Shoe- Pick SZ/Color. , New Balance MW770DD New Balance 770 Moc Shoes Size 14 Walking Trail Hiking , Nike Air VaporMax Flyknit EXPLORER Black Rose Gold 849558-010 sz 8 Brand newTHIRTY TWO MEN'S LASHED SNOWBOARDING BOOTS,BLACK/WHITE/BLACK US SIZE 5, , Florsheim Imperial, Men's Size 8.5 D, Pebble Leather Oxofrd Wingtips, Black , Johnston & Murphy 59 11556 Men's Brown Shoes 10.5 M L12 Made in India , NEW! WOMENS SKECHERS GO GOLF TROPIC 14854 WHT/FLORAL SIZE 7 122M mNew Balance Girls' Urge V2 Hook and Loop Road Running Shoe Pink 9 Wide US Infant , Women's NIKE AIR ZOOM WILDHORSE 4 (880556-300),TRAIL RUNNING Shoes,NEW WITH BOX. , Howsty x Anthropologie Womens Zia Kilim Sneakers White Size 40 NewADIDAS STELLA MCCARTNEY Ultra Boost Womens Shoes CG3684 Apricot Rose 8.5 , Marni Blue Multicolor Colorblock Platform Sneakers SZ 36Georgia Boot Women's GB00233 ReFLX Alloy Toe Work Athletic Shoe Black
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike Air Force SZ 1 Low '07 Suede Dark PRM NEW Gray/Gum Women's SZ 7 NEW 749263 001 PRM QS 5983eed
    Athletic Shoes