Never miss an update

Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d

Item specifics

: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Color: Brown Leopard Animal
Fastening: Slip On Brand: Sperry Topsider
Country/Region of Manufacture: China Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.)
Heel Type: Block Width: Medium (B, M)
Style: Rainboots US Shoe Size (Women's): 5
Occasion: Casual Pattern: Animal Print
Material: Rubber fabric
Never miss an update

Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d -

    Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d
    Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d
    Lauren by Ralph Lauren Mesa Wide Calf Riding Boots 918, Dark Brown/Dark Brown, , Brinley Co Women's Buffalo Motorcycle Boot Black 8 M US , Ollio Women Shoe Suede Zip up Cutout Ankle High Heel Bootie Black 6.5 M USMen's/Women's Comfortiva Vardel Women's Boot-Brown Leather-Size 7W-New quality Low price VariousLugz Women's Tambora Winter Boot Charcoal/Cream/Black 9 M US , Andres Machado Women's Chelsea Ankle Boot Brown Suede , Zigi Soho Womens Brown Knee Boots 8 , Call It Spring Womens Talchuano-99 Closed Toe Ankle Fashion BootsGUESS Brown Embossed Leather Ankle Boots 3" Slim Heel 37.5 Sz 7 Italy VERO CUOIO , Bella Vita Transit II Plus Calf Women's KneeHigh Fashion Boots,Black,New,9M,0175 , J. Crew 04326 MacAlister 3 Inch Wedge Heel Natural Suede Ankle Boots Size 10 , Sam Edelman Black Leather Heel Knee High Boots Women's 8MChinese Laundry Women's Ultra Wedge Boot Grey Suedette 6 M US , Minnetonka Back Zip Hardsole Boot Brown 282 Women's Boot , Cole Haan Callie Slip-On Waterproof Rain Shoes 688, Black, 5 US , BCBGeneration Dice Knee High Dress Boots 963, Black, 9.5 US / 39.5 EU , Steve Madden Women's Ecntrcv Sneaker - Choose SZ/color , CLARKS BLACK LEATHER FASHION DRESS ANKLE BOOTS SHOES ZIP SIDE US WOMENS SZ 8 MFrye MISMATCH Womens 9.5 9 B Melissa Button NEW Leather Riding Boots 77167 gkRefresh Alto-03 Women's Low Heel Side Zipper Knee High Two Tone Riding Boots , Lamo Women's Classic Snow Boot Chestnut 6 M USnew RALPH LAUREN women boots shoes leather brown winter fall 6B MSRP $165 , Brinley Co Women's Bailey-wc Riding Boot Chestnut Wide 7 M US , Blowfish Women's Baldwin Whiskey Tombstone Pu Tan Buckle Wedge Ankle Boot , BareTraps Women's Bt Dallia Riding Boot Black 6.5 M US , H by Hudson Women's Maldive Ultrasuede Fashion Sneaker, Navy, 39 EU/8 M US , Ankle Boots for Women Booties Heels Black leather Fall Ladies Pointed Toe , Kelsi Dagger Brooklyn Kingston Ankle Boot 882, Ginger, 10 US / 41 EU , Northside Women's Mont Blanc Waterproof Snow Boot Black 6 M US ,
    Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d ->Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d -
    G'FIELD DESIGNER LEATHER MSDE IN DPAIN FLATS QUALITY NEW SZ 37 , New Django & Juliette Shanae Womens Shoes Sandals HeeledMerrell Encore Lattice Mesh Sport Slip-On Mules Women’s 10 M in Apricot Q-Form , Adrienne Vittadini Womens Abel Suede Almond Toe Loafers Blubrry Size 10.0 Km6pLuxury Womens Chic Handmake Rhinestone Stars Bootie Loafers Pumps Oxfords ShoesEcco Black Leather Three Strap Sport Slingback Sandals Size 37 EU / 6 - 6.5 US , Puma Alexander McQueen AMQ Joustesse Mid Wedge Womens Trainers 355397 03 U57 , Nike Air Jordan 8 Retro Basketball 'Bugs Bunny' Shoes 305381-103 SIZE 12 , NIB - UNDER ARMOUR Men's BANDIT 1273951 077 Gray RUNNING SHOES - 10.5 / 44.5 , ua curry 3 shoes size 10 men new with box birthday blue , Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro Mid Basketball Shoe Black/ White (554724 034)Men's Nike Force Lunarbeast Elite TD Football Cleats 779422 007 Sz 9Men's Brand New Nike Roshe Two Athletic Fashion Topic Era Sneakers [844656 400] , Michael Jordan Olympic Boxing Shoes- Size 7.5 US Men's/ 9.5 Women's , New $140 Adidas Busenitz Pure Boost Ultra Scarlet Red/White Skateboarding sz 11 , Men/Women Dakota Men's Black Work Boot 11M bargain First quality Authentic guarantee , Vintage Danner Mountaineering 9" Shaft, Hunter Survivalist Boot, Size 8.5 D , New $1100 Ralph Lauren Purple Label Mens Shearling Lined Boots Shoes Black 11 USMen's Stacy Adams Dress Shoes STANBURY 25070 Navy Blue Wing Tip Oxford Leather , Saucony Womens Xodus ISO Trail Runner, Purple/Pink/Cotton, 8 M US , Tommy Hilfiger Women's Phina Walking Shoe, White, 7.5 M USNEW Nike Wmns Air Max Light Essential 624725-105 Womens Shoes Trainers Sneakers , New Balance Women's WW840 Health Walking Shoe, White/Pink, 10 D USNEW Miu Miu Stone Cap Toe Beige Linen Skate Sneaker Shoes Cap Toe 36.5 , Women's Smoky Mountain Inch Square toe boots Red Size 6.5 MWmns Nike Aegina Mid ACG Slouchy Brown Boots Sz 7.5~8.5 MSRP $100 NIB 454400-203Retro Ankle Boots Womens Non-Slip Round Toe Side Zipper Comfy Coffee Shoes Bt15Womens High Top Mid calf Leather Boots Buckle Retro Knight winter shoes outdoorWomens Dr. Martens Leyton Burgundy Leather Boots Size US 6 TT24Gentleman/Lady Cliffs 'Francie' Women's Boot Clever and practical Stylish and fun Strong heat and heat resistance
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Sperry Top Sider Brown mogochinese-19153 Leopard Rubber Slip On Rain Sider Boots Womens 5 Galoshes Rubber Shoes dbe2d9d