Never miss an update

$140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Shoes
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8.5 Heel Style: Creeper
Color: Pink Product Line: PUMA Fenty
Brand: Puma UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

$140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b - blurrypron.com

    $140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b
    $140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b
    Cougar Women's Hula Knit Slip On Sneaker Dove Stretch Knit SneakersOLUKAI Pehuea Shoes - Womens Vintage Indigo/Palm 5New Women's Brooks Levitate Running Shoes Black/Ebony/Silver 1202581B004 Size 12 , Skechers Women's Hi-Lites Velvet Vixon High Top Navy Sneakers , Cole Haan "Traftan" Vintage Trainer Marine Blue Walking Shoes Size 9 *NIB* , Nike Wmns Air Max 90 LX Casual Womens Shoes Tar Black 898512-005New Balance 530 Athletic Women's Shoes Size 5.5Keds x Rifle Paper Co. Women's Kickstart Hi Juliet Navy Canvas Sneakers , Skechers Women's YOU Beginning Sneaker Taupe Sneakers , Cougar Women's Hula Knit Slip On Sneaker Black Stretch Knit Sneakers , Ann Creek Women's Flores Rhinestone and Studded Knee High Boot Black ZipperPuma Fenty by Rihanna Bow Creeper Sandal Pint Tint Oatmeal Womens Shoe Size 6.5 , Foot Petals Women's Andi Classic Trainer Silver Genuine Leather/Woven Fabric , Merrell Womens Siren Guided Moc Jersey Black / Charcoal 7 gray shoes size 7Earth Women's Tayberry Slip-On Wash Gold Metallic Printed Leather Sneakers , REBECCA MINKOFF Women's Stella Suede Fringe Sneakers $225 NIBNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam Cruz v2 Sport Shoe Fiji/White SneakersASICS Women's Amplica Running Shoe Black/White Sneakers , NEW BALANCE 576 MADE IN ENGLAND W576MM WOMAN 998 997 1500 577 574 990 993 SPRINGNew Balance Fresh Foam Cruz V2 - Women's Fiji/White Sport CRUZRC2BKendall & Kylie Women's Tyler Sneaker Silver Size 9.5 NEW IN BOXADIDAS ZX FLUX ADV VIRTUE PK W PRIMEKNIT BLUE BB4265 WOMENS SIZE 6 , Vionic Women's Adley Black/Charcoal 7 B US , NIB Vince Women’s Warner Platform Black Leather Slip On Sneaker Size 6 $250 , Converse x Miley Cyrus Chuck Taylor All Star High Black 162234C Size M4 W6 , Nike Air Huarache Ultra Womens Size 7 Sand Sail Olive Sandal Slippers NewNike Air Span II Women Lifestyle Shoes Summit White 2018 Sneakers AH6800-401New Balance Women's 880V7 - Xwide Light Porcelain Blue/Black/Alpha Pink RunningNIKE HOODLAND SUEDE - WMNS - / / US 8.5 / CM 25.5 ,
    $140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b - blurrypron.com>$140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b - blurrypron.com
    Frye Womens Jen Shearling Boots Water Resistant Suede Smoke 9.5 NEW IN BOXWomens Lacoste Explorateur MID 118 1 Shoes/trainers/casual black SZ /Us6/EU37Mootsies Tootsies Women's Brad Strappy Flat Black Smooth Faux Leather FlatsMunro American Women's Black Shimmer Suede Jerrie Slip-on Loafer Size 5.5WWPRADA BROWN SUEDE BALLET FLATS SIZE 39 US 9 , Dansko Maci Full Grain Black Comfort Slide Ladies EU size 36 US 5 1/2- 6 NIB , JOE'S ARNIE NEW $119 SZ 8.5 M BLACK LEATHER SUEDE ANKLE STRAP STILETTO PUMPS , PLEASER Closed Back Strappy Corset Style Ankle Strap Sandal DELIGHT-662 Black , Men/Women D'ICI Shoes 285794 Black 23cm elegant Attractive fashion Elegant and solemnFENDI Silver Metallic Skin Open Toe Ankle Strap Pump Shoes Sz 39 180243PK , PIERRE HARDY $890 NIB Black Patent & Suede Banded Sandals 36NIB $345 OPENING CEREMONY Luna Suede Black/White Leopard Print Wedges Sz 8/38Pink Paradox London Women's Wave Dress Thong Sandal , Saucony Originals Mens Shadow O School Spirit Fashion SneakerM- Pick SZ/Color.New Balance 574 Classic ML574XRT Retro Red Suede Marathon Running Shoes Men's 12 , Corral Men's Round Toe Comfort Cowboy Western Boots Brown Embroidery A3300Vtg. Tony Lama snake skin vamp, Gray (greenish) cowboy/western boots Size 10 B , Converse CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR OX Unisex Black Canvas Sneaker Shoes , VON DESIGNED IN THE USA LEATHER SLIP ON CASUAL COMFORTABLE DRESS SHOES SIZE 11M , Klogs Tiburon Unisex Comfort Slip-resistant Cl Purple Rain - 11 WideMr/Ms Calvin Klein Men's Lloyd Rubber Oxford Long-term reputation discount classic style , Christian Louboutin : Amazing Espoil Flat T42, US9, UK8ECCO Men's Grenoble Gore-TEX Tie Oxford - Choose SZ/Color , New Women Breathable Mixed Color Running Trainers Sneakers Athletic Shoes CasualNEW WOMENS ADIDAS NOKO W OUTDOOR PLEIN AIR GREY NATURAL BLACK SHOES 8 8.5 9 D2 , Keen Womens Hiking Trail Athletic Shoes Sneakers-Puple- Size 7Vans Black Ball Hi SF leila Hurst 70's Floral Women's 5 , Wmns Nike Flex Bijoux Tea Berry Metallic Silver Women Training Shoes 881863-601 , Bearpaw Margaery Boot - Women's Chestnut Distressed 8.0 , AUSTRALIAN MARINO CRAFT TALL AMERICAN TALL BOOTS ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    $140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    $140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    $140 Fenty Puma Fenty By Rihanna Women Bow Creeper Sandal Puma Rihanna Pink (365794-01) Sz 8.5 58fad8b
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;