Never miss an update

GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353

Item specifics

Condition: New without tags :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item that is not in original retail packaging or may be missing original retail packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Display shoe. , minor wear on soles. The images shown are of the actual shoes for sale.
Brand: Giani Bernini Material: Suede
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7 Pattern: Solid
Colour: Black Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
MPN: Oleesia Width: Wide (C, D, W)
Style: Ankle Boots UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353 -

    GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353
    GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353
    Aerosoles Longevity Studded Ankle Booties 337, Black, 9.5 US , Aerosoles Inevitable Ankle Boots 565, Black, 10 US , Lucky Brand Zavrina Multi Strap Ankle Boots F19, Incense, 6 US DisplaySteve Madden Hanna Harness Boot 443, Black Suede, 9 US , Cole Haan Callie Slip-On Waterproof Rain Shoes 660, Black, 5.5 USAnne Klein Gorgia Chelsea Ankle Booties 013, Black/Black Suede, 8 US , Born Beebe Casual Ankle Boots 247, Brown, 6.5 US / 37 EU , Khombu Mayana Cold Weather Boots 087, Black, 6 US , I35 Fedee Harness Strap Wide Calf Riding Boots, Cognac, 5 US DisplayNew Arrival!EOS LAUREN TAUPE leather flat sandal! RRP160! Made in Portugal! SALE , B.O.C Austin Flat Knee-High Comfort Boots 276, Black, 6 US , Soul Sandals Dampier Italian Leather Slip On Sandal - UniSexmadden girl Poche Slouch Mid-Calf Boots, Cognac, 9.5 US UsedIvanka Trump Lynna Ankle Booties 731, Black, 6.5 USI35 FrankII Buckle Riding Boots 045, Black/Cognac, 11 US , I35 Fedee Harness Strap Wide Calf Riding Boots 724, Cognac, 5.5 USGB35 Beckyy Knee-High Boots 640, Cognac, 9 US , Lauren by Ralph Lauren Quinlyn Snow Boots 293, Black/Grey, 6.5 US , Aerosoles Ever After Double Zipper Riding Boots, Black, 6 M US UsedRARE Brand new Free People Carrera Heel Boot Black US6 EUR36GB35 Calae Ankle Boots 061, Dark Taupe, 6.5 USFranco Sarto Lizbeth Wide Calf Riding Boots, Black/Brown, 5 US / 35 EU Display , I35 Fedee Harness Strap Riding Boots 465, Black, 5.5 USAdrienne Vittadini Senji Double Zip Ankle Booties, Black Leather, 9.5 US , Lauren by Ralph Lauren Mesa Wide Calf Riding Boots 918, Dark Brown/Dark Brown, , Kenneth Cole REACTION Rotini Side Fringe Ankle Boots, Putty, 10US/41EU DisplayCole Haan Callie Slip-On Waterproof Rain Shoes 673, Black, 6 US , I35 Everleeh Fringe Wedge Pointed Toe Slouch Boots, Black, 8.5 US Display , Dr. Scholl's Brilliance Wide Calf Riding Boots 267, Black, 10 US / 40 EU ,
    GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353 ->GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353 -
    Ladies Barbour Latimer Snow Winter Casual Buckle Quilted Chelsea Boots All SizesMan/Woman ESSENTIEL Antwerp Shoes 400451 Black 37 the most convenient First grade in its class SimpleFemme chaussures bottines en cuir model LOREN Eu 33 au 44Vans SK8-Hi Sea Fog Purple White Men Skate Boarding Shoes Sneakers 72010619 , AUTHENTIC PRADA NYLON KNEE HIGH BOOTS BLACK 36 1/2 GRADE A USED -HP , BALLY Vintage Womens SZ US 10M Navy Leather 2.25" Heel Slip On Pumps - ItalyNaturalizer Nevis Wedge Ankle Strap Pumps 167, Navy, 10 USSt. John Women's Classic Pumps Red Leather Brass Heel Logo 7AANIB ALEXANDER MCQUEEN SKULL CHAIN ANKLE STRAP SANDALS Sz 40/ 10.5 or 11Sanuk Size 9 White Yoga Mat Sandals New Womens ShoesNIB CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN BLACK RED SOLE CREPON 100 MM PLATFORM SANDALS SHOE 38 8Louboutin Shoe Black Patent Leather Strappy Size 40 1/2 NEWVolatile Women's Dark Brown Jewel Platform Wedge Slip On Sandals - Size 9$120 size 8 Kenneth Cole Kingvel White Leather Strap Sneakers Womens shoes NEW , New Men's Air Jordan 1 Mid Nouveau Shoes (629151-403) Men US 12 / / Eur 46 , Brooks Ghost 10 ( black & silver) Size 9.5DNike Roshe One Mens Style : 5118812017 Nike Air Jordan Retro 1 Quai 54 size 6.5Y , Mens Nike Shox NZ Premium Sneakers New, Black / Silver 536184-001 sku AA , Polo Ralph Lauren Men's Marlow Chukka (desert) Boots US 10.5DGeorgia Boot Brown Leather Steel Toe Waterproof Slip Resistant Work Boot GB00018 , Mens Males Dandy Loafer Fashion Sneakers Casual Oxford Shoes Brown CS-MVK_ICMan/Woman Asics Women's Gel-Vanisher Ankle-High Running Shoe Easy to clean surface Let our goods go to the world Speed ​​refundSpenco Men's Yumi Sandal Medium Brown Leather Thong SandalsTaylor Swift Keds Sneaky Cat Black Sneakers Sz 9.5M NEWVibram Womens KSO Running Shoe, Black, 40 EU/9 M USWomens Pointed Toe Rhinestone Flower High Heels Ankle Boots Prom Shoes Pumps SzWomen Med Block Heel Round Toe Ankle Boots Cow Leather TPU Side Zipper Shoes HotSexy women's high heel stilettos over knee thigh boots suede leather party shoes , Womens Platform Black Block Heel Red Stitch Goth Ankle Boots DEMONIA ASST100/BVL ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    GB35 Oleesia GB35 Casual Ankle Boots 29917 768, Black, Ankle 7 W US 984d353