Never miss an update

Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5

Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Rupert Sanderson
Heel Type: Block Colour: Brown
Pattern: Leopard/Cheetah MPN: Oscar
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Style: Ankle Boots
Width: Medium (B, M) Material: Haircalf
Shade: Medium Brown
Never miss an update

Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5 -

    Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5
    Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5
    Man's/Woman's Chloe Susanna Boots Many styles Low price Vintage tide shoes , Rick Owens black round-toe stiletto heel boots ankle booties 8/38Stuart Weitzman McClean Black Boots Size Us36.5 RRP960 Brand NewG- star raw ranker boot Size 39Lipstik High Boots STROBE BLK MICRO ( size, 7 ) , Balenciaga Paris Super Amazing Over The Knee Leather Boots Black Sz41 , Naot Helm in Arizona Tan, Black Combo, Maple Brown , Men's/Women's IXOS ELASTIC GREY BOOT Complete specification range Sufficient supply Preferential price , Ariat Womens Primetime Western Boots NEW - All Sizes , Italian Designer Black Leather Ankle Boots (CLEARANCE STOCK)Nocona NL5300 Tan Crackle Goat Ladies Western Cowboy Cowgirl Boots Women's , Italian designer Leather Ankle Boots in Bordeaux (CLEARANCE STOCK) , Isabel Marant Bobby Boots Sneakers Trainers Size 38 , Habbot womens silver Italian leather boots size 38NEW Sandler Victor Mid Brown Glove Boot'As New' Valentino Garavani thigh high boots size 40Giuseppe Zanotti Wedge Runners With Suede And Swarovski Black Crystals 36Authentic Prada knee high black leather boots size 35 plus know your sizing , Man's/Woman's Diana Ferrari Supersoft Pinto in BLACK main category Sufficient supply Outstanding style , Authentic MOSCHINO Ankle Boots Shoes With Gold Detailsma+ womens boots, black, size eu 37 handmade In Italy, worn 3 times. , Gentleman/Lady RM Williams Adelaide Boot Elegant and sturdy set meal Selected materials Full range of specifications , DORATEYMUR Women's Designer All Leather Knee High. Black Boots Size 38Ladies Black Leather Ankle Boots From Hoss Size 39 (38 Will Need A 39-small Fit , Ariat Women's Gringa Western Country Riding Boots SZ 8 , Stuart Weitzman ALLJILL Boots BLACK size 8W/38.5Burberry Leather & House Check Boots Size 35.5 RP $1200 As newVionnet Tandi Ankle Boots Size 40 ($1200 Retail) , Givenchy Shark Lock Ankle Boots Size 38.5 RRP$1800
    Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5 ->Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5 -
    Corral Ladies Bone/Black Glitter Inlay Boot E1237 , $695 Burberry Worchester Belted Suede Check Ankle Booties Moto Boots IT 35.5 5.5 , Unisa Womens BUDYRI Hi-Top Trainers, White White White, 5 UKSteve Madden Swyndlee Multi Strap Dress Sandals 715, Black, 6 USEspadrille model 114198 Inello - Matter - Shoes , ECCO WOMEN'S TOUCH BALLERINA SLIP-ON FLAT SHOE , Mr/Ms Very Volatile Women's Veracruz Ankle Bootie Ideal gift for all occasions New design Full range of specificationsSexy Cut out Platform 7" High Heel Black Yellow Two Tone Sandals Shoes , Women's Shoes Wedge Straw Shoes Platform Sandals Zipper Grace Party Open Toe NewVTG Martinez Valero Snake Skin/Print Womens Shoes Sz. 7 MNew Munro Mules Black Leather Slides 8.5 N WomenDior KCE087SSZ Black Ankle Strap Leather Platform Sandal 6 36 NIB $790Chic Womens Suede Fur Creepers High Wedge Heels Ankle Strappy Sandals SlingbacksMen's/Women's Skechers Men's Go Walk Max-54601 Sneaker Wear resistant special function Authentic guaranteeSPARCO Racing Mens Hi Top Sneaker - Gray Suede Leather - MONZA-GP , Nike PG 1 Men's Black/Light Bone/Light Aqua 78627002Man/Woman adidas Mens NMD_R1 Black/Black/Red - B37618 Rich design Affordable Cost-effective , Sperry Top-Sider A/O Plaid Cloth Boat Shoe, Men's Size 9.5BALLY “Rumo” Black Leather Slip On Driving Loafers Men E US 9 Wide ITALY , Mens Prints Cartoon Slip On Loafers Business Party Shoes Hairlist Dress Casual , Camper Women's Beetle K400239 Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorStacy Adams Mens madison Buckle Dress Oxfords, oak, Size 11.0Nike Men's Free Trainer 3.0 Training Shoe Size US 8 Vivid Blue/Lt Crimson/Whit , Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Ox Hyper Magenta Womens Canvas Low-top Trainers , Nike Lunar Hyperworkout+ Sport Pack Black/Silver/Blue 532224-002 $220 Size 9.5DS NIKE 2015 DUNK RICARDO TISCI RT BLACK 5.5 PATTA ATMOS 1 90 95 MAX LOEPARDNike Air Max 97 Ultra '17 SE Grape white court purple violet womens AH6806 102Muck Boots Company Kid's HALE, BLACK/HOT PINK, Neoprene Rubber WaterproofFly London Luz, Stivali Chelsea Donna, Nero (Black 000),35 EUDolce Vita Women's Jac Ankle Boot, Smoke Suede, 6 Medium US
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Rupert Sanderson Oscar Low-Heel Ankle Ankle Oscar Low-Heel Boots, Leopard f05e8c5