Never miss an update

Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Lauren by Ralph Lauren
Heel Height: High (3 to 4 1/4) Style: Slingbacks
Heel Type: Block MPN: Olessia
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8 Width: Narrow (AA, N)
Occasion: Casual Material: Leather
Pattern: Solid Color: Brown
Shade: Dark Brown Fastening: Buckle
UPC: 888187189073
Never miss an update

Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff - blurrypron.com

    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff
    Birkenstock gizeh BS mocca size 6Pikolinos Mykonos Wedge sandal Womens-Size 10.5-11 Black , Adalyn Espadrille Wedge Sandal :: EUC :: Size 6**Jack Rogers Nantucket Gold Sandal - Women's Size 6, White/Gold (DAMAGED) , Cole Haan Espresso Brown Slides Sandals Kitten Heel 7.5 MGentle Souls Womens Lily Moon Leather Suede Ankle Strap Wedge Sandal 7 M EUCNEW Birkenstock Julie Womens US 6 Beige Animal Print Rhinestone SandalsVionic Albany Embellished Ivory T-Strap Adjustable Closure Slide Sandals 10 NEW! , Anthropologie Lien Do Womens Shoes Size 8 Slides Denim Seychelles Buenavista NewVince Womens Size 9 Black Westcoast Slide Comfort Flats Sandals Shoes F4-91 , Guess Women 9.5 High Heel Dress Sandals Metal Silver STRAPPY Leather Prom NewSteve Madden Womens Scarlett Pink Dress Sandals Shoes 8.5 Medium (B,M) BHFO 4962 , Vince Womens Size 9 Black Nico Leather CrissCross Slide Sandals Shoes F4-116Fitflop Womens Rokkit Beige Suede Flip-Flops Shoes 9 Medium (B,M) BHFO 3745Women's 6 3/4 in Spike Heel Platform Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorB-334 Birkenstock 'Gizeh' Birko-Flor™ Thong (Women) Sz (US 6- 6.5) , Dolce Vita Women's Hades Heeled Sandal, Onyx Suede, 9.5 Medium USVince Womens Size 8 Black Nico Leather CrissCross Slide Sandals Shoes F4-122 , Kenneth Cole REACTION Women's Reed Forever Two Piece Strappy Sandal with Ankl... , Man/Woman Born,womens,sandal,Timia,rust,ankle strap,heel,buckles,cushioned insole New product Attractive fashion comfortableUnder Armour Men's Ignite Ridge Reaper Slide Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Man's/Woman's Alegria Copper Metallic Sandals 7M Cheap Optimal price Amoy , VOLATILE Womens Ashford Tan 8 M US , ALEGRIA genuine black leather two strap molded comfort sandals 7.5 7WBIRKENSTOCK Womens Florida Black Leather Slides Sandals Shoes Size 7 ZB2-331Chinese Laundry Womens Tayla Rose Gold Glitter 8 M USWolky Multi Color Fantasy Women' s US 7 Ankle Strap Wedge Sandals 161 , Skechers Go 600 - Ideal Navy/Gray Womens Slingback SZ 11M , Crocs Womens Leigh II Cross Strap Wedge Sandal WorldWide Free Shipping
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff - blurrypron.com>Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff - blurrypron.com
    Reebok Crossfit Nano 8 [CN1039] Women Training Shoes White/Grey-Gumadidas CrazyTrain Pro 3.0 W III Women Cross Training Shoes Sneakers Pick 1Mens Bugatti Formal Shoes The Style 311-18801-1000-1000 -w , Le Chameau Vierzonord Womens Green Rubber Wellington BootsAC655 MBT shoes black leather studs women boots , Nina Nura Kitten Heel Slingback Sandals, Platino , New Dr Martens Talib Indigo Blue Leather High Tops Chukka Boots Shoes LadiesNaot Mist Women Mary Jane Leather Shoes Sandals Slip On Slides Black New Flat , Donald J Pliner Black Libbi Rhinestone Suede Slip On Flat Loafer Shoe 9.5 New , Salvatore Ferragamo Boutique Women's Shoes Beige Cream Heels Pumps size 8.5 AAA , Franco Sarto Black Suede Danissa Ankle Strap Wedge Sandal 9.5 NEW , Saucony Womens Excursion TR11 GTX Running Shoe Purple Grey Black 5.5 M , ADIDAS ORIGINALS Mens Size 10 N-5923 INIKI RUNNER [AQ1125] , Yacht Club Vans Old Skool VN0A38G1R1Q Blue Green Yellow Men multicolor mismatchNike Free RN Distance 2 II Run Multi-Color Men Running Shoes Sneakers 863775-701Ultra Boost Uncaged (Cloud White) (Sz 7-13 Available) , DOUBLE H Mens Brown Wide Square Roper Boot DH3561 Size 8.5 EE , Nike Dart 12 (4E) Size 9.5 - 831534-100 , Gentleman/Lady Cole Haan High-quality Price reduction International big nameCamper K100152-001 Mens Neuman K100152 Tuxedo Oxford- Choose SZ/Color.Mens Ecco Black Leather Plain Toe Tie Dress Shoes - Size 43 Or 9 / 9.5Massimo Matteo- Cap Medln Oxfords, Men's Size 11, BrownNunn Bush Men’s Noah Penny Loafer Slip-On - Choose SZ/Color , Allen Edmonds DELRAY Oxfords Size US 11 D Black Split Toe , WOMEN'S SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA BASKET PLATFORM [364123 01]NEW ADIDAS WOMEN'S ORIGINALS NMD R1 STLT PRIMEKNIT SHOES [CQ2031] ASH GREEN , Kenneth Cole New York Women's Kam Ballet Sneaker Cloud Sheep Nappa LeatherNew! Free People Alamosa Black Distressed Leather Cuffed Ankle Boots US 6VINCE CAMUTO YONKER BROWN PRALINE LEATHER ANKLE BOOTIES womens size 7.5 BNIB Womens Unisa Russo Black Napa Leather Booties Shoes Size 10
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff
    Sandals
    >
    ;