Never miss an update

Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Lauren by Ralph Lauren
Heel Height: High (3 to 4 1/4) Style: Slingbacks
Heel Type: Block MPN: Olessia
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8 Width: Narrow (AA, N)
Occasion: Casual Material: Leather
Pattern: Solid Color: Brown
Shade: Dark Brown Fastening: Buckle
UPC: 888187189073
Never miss an update

Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff -

    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff
    Birkenstock gizeh BS mocca size 6 , Pikolinos Mykonos Wedge sandal Womens-Size 10.5-11 BlackAdalyn Espadrille Wedge Sandal :: EUC :: Size 6 , **Jack Rogers Nantucket Gold Sandal - Women's Size 6, White/Gold (DAMAGED)Cole Haan Espresso Brown Slides Sandals Kitten Heel 7.5 MGentle Souls Womens Lily Moon Leather Suede Ankle Strap Wedge Sandal 7 M EUCNEW Birkenstock Julie Womens US 6 Beige Animal Print Rhinestone Sandals , Vionic Albany Embellished Ivory T-Strap Adjustable Closure Slide Sandals 10 NEW! , Anthropologie Lien Do Womens Shoes Size 8 Slides Denim Seychelles Buenavista New , Vince Womens Size 9 Black Westcoast Slide Comfort Flats Sandals Shoes F4-91 , Guess Women 9.5 High Heel Dress Sandals Metal Silver STRAPPY Leather Prom New , Steve Madden Womens Scarlett Pink Dress Sandals Shoes 8.5 Medium (B,M) BHFO 4962Vince Womens Size 9 Black Nico Leather CrissCross Slide Sandals Shoes F4-116 , Fitflop Womens Rokkit Beige Suede Flip-Flops Shoes 9 Medium (B,M) BHFO 3745 , Women's 6 3/4 in Spike Heel Platform Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , B-334 Birkenstock 'Gizeh' Birko-Flor™ Thong (Women) Sz (US 6- 6.5)Dolce Vita Women's Hades Heeled Sandal, Onyx Suede, 9.5 Medium USVince Womens Size 8 Black Nico Leather CrissCross Slide Sandals Shoes F4-122Kenneth Cole REACTION Women's Reed Forever Two Piece Strappy Sandal with Ankl...Man/Woman Born,womens,sandal,Timia,rust,ankle strap,heel,buckles,cushioned insole New product Attractive fashion comfortableUnder Armour Men's Ignite Ridge Reaper Slide Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Man's/Woman's Alegria Copper Metallic Sandals 7M Cheap Optimal price AmoyVOLATILE Womens Ashford Tan 8 M US , ALEGRIA genuine black leather two strap molded comfort sandals 7.5 7W , BIRKENSTOCK Womens Florida Black Leather Slides Sandals Shoes Size 7 ZB2-331 , Chinese Laundry Womens Tayla Rose Gold Glitter 8 M USWolky Multi Color Fantasy Women' s US 7 Ankle Strap Wedge Sandals 161Skechers Go 600 - Ideal Navy/Gray Womens Slingback SZ 11MCrocs Womens Leigh II Cross Strap Wedge Sandal WorldWide Free Shipping ,
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff ->Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff -
    8.5 B AUTHENTIC JUSTIN HANDMADE COWBOY BOOTS BLACK SQUARE TOE L4327 WOMENSWomen's Tony Lama Exotic Snakeskin & Black Leather Western Cowboy Boots - 7.5 APuma R698 Block 2016 Classic Lifestyle Shoes Peacoat/Rose Red-Holiday 360030 06 , 52762 auth HERMES black leather SHEARLING Flat Knee-High Boots Shoes 37.5Lane Women's Studs and Straps Cheetah Boot - Snip Toe - LB0289E , Adidas Originals EQT Support ADV [BB6777] Men Casual Shoes Black/Red , NEW BALANCE WOMENS WKAYMLB1 BLACK PINK WHITE RUNNING SHOES **FREE POST AUSTRALIA , Shoes IgieCo 1142444 Woman colour capra laminated cover/taupe mode fashion , Assault-203 Studded Buckle Platform Boots Size 10Irregular Choice Baroness Womens Red Floral Suede & Fabric Ankle Boots - 37 EUAnne Klein Hallie Patent Pumps, Metallic Taupe, 8 US , Man's/Woman's Adidas Superstar 80s W Quality products Cheaper than the price Fair pricep DANSKO Women BROWN Leather PROFESSIONAL DANCE Shoe NURSING Clogs 40 9.5 1/2 10womens open toe stiletto high heel platform pumps leather chic sandals slip onRachel Comey Bixel Heels Pump Shoe Metallic Floral Size 6 Fall 2015 $414 , NIB GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI ASH PYTHON LEATHER PEEP TOE NIKA HIGH HEEL PUMPS 39.5Dolce & Gabbana Leopard Pony Hair Suede Hearts Heels Pattern Shoes White BeigeWomens Fashion Summer Peep Toe Block High Heels Mules Slippers Leather Sandals , Women's Shoes Lucky Brand JAIDAN Demi Wedge Sandals Leather Linen Size 7.5 , DC Shoes Astor Shoes Black Men ADYS100358-3BKNike Men's Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Running ShoeNike Air Max Motion LW BLACK/WHITE 833260-010 Running Shoes Sneakers , Under Armour Charged Bandit 3 Ombre Men's Black/Downtown Green/White 20119005 , NIKE ZOOM STEFAN JANOSKI PREM from japan (4337 , NEW SANTONI Dress Brown Leather Shoes SIZE Eu 44 Us 11 (7R)75% OFF NEW MERCANTI FIORENTINI Bamboo Bit Loafer Tan sz 8 $295 , NIKE AIR FORCE 1 ROSIES DRY GOODS atmos stash htm kaws questlove playstation 14Nike Air Vapor Ace Women’s Running Shoes New Size 6.5Under Armour Women's Speedform Xc Ankle-High Running Shoe , New Carhartt Romeo Size 7.5 M CWS4177 Embossed 4" Women’s Work Boot RETAIL $109
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Lauren Ralph Lauren/ N Olessia Slingback Sandals, Lauren Dark Brown, 8 N US/ 39 EU 388dcff