Never miss an update

naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: naturalizer
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Style: Knee High Boots
Material: Leather Width: Medium (B, M)
Pattern: Solid Color: Brown
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 4/UK 2/EU 34.5 Heel Type: Block
Shade: Medium Brown UPC: 727679880527
Never miss an update

naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658 -

    naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658
    naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658
    Aerosoles After Hours Riding Boots, Black Combo , Vince Camuto Hayzee Fringe Ankle Boots, Deep Sugar Plum, 8.5 W USIvanka Trump Telora Ankle Boots, Taupe Suede, 8 USIvanka Trump Larell Over-The-Knee Riding Boots, Dark Gray , Franco Sarto Eckhart Tassel Back Over The Knee Boots 475, Taupe, 6.5 USnaturalizer Kala Block-Heel Ankle Boots, Oatmeal Leather, 6 US / 36 EU , naturalizer Tynner Triple Side Strap Boots, Bridal Brown, 11 US / 41 EU , French Connection Grant Riding Boots, Black, 6 USDolce Vita Channy Riding Boots, Black, 7.5 USBCBGeneration Denver Knee High Fashion Boots, Oak, 10 USBorn Oswego Low-Heel Mid-Calf Boots 309, Tan, 6.5 US / 37 EU , Ivanka Trump Larell Over-The-Knee Riding Boots, Medium BrownNine West Dale Pull On Ankle Boots, Dark Brown/Dark Brown , GB35 Raiven Knee High Buckle Boots, Black, 6.5 US , Nine West Heelium Over The Knees Pointed Toe Boots, Black, 8 USCharles by Charles David Julia Riding Boots, Black Suede, 5 USNaturalizer Lamont Zip Up Heeled Boots, Black, 8.5 W US , Men's/Women's Women's Double-H Cowboy Boots Size 10 the most convenient Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience professional designKelsi Dagger Moore Mid Calf Boots, Black , French Connection Dilyla Block Heel Ankle Boots, Navy, 7.5 US / 37.5 EU , Steve Madden Trico Zip Up Knee High Boots, Black, 8.5 US , Vince Camuto Beatrix Ankle Studded Riding Boots, Black, 5.5 US / 35.5 EUVince Camuto Paton Wide Calf Fashion Boots, Sherwood Bark, 7.5 US, Sherwood BarkIvanka Trump Lory3 Pull On Ankle Boots, Ivory , BCBGeneration Kandy Flat Knee-High Boots, Black, 10 USMan/Woman Splendid Jessika Peep-Toe Booties, Dark Gray Beautiful design product quality renewed on time , Sexy 5" Heel Rear Lacing Black Leather Women's Thigh High Boots INDULGE-3011Sofft Felicia Knee High Dress Boots, Ash Grey, 9.5 US / 41 EUKelsi Dagger Brooklyn Kline Ankle Boots, Wheat ,
    naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658 ->naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658 -
    DONALD J PLINER TOBACCO VTG LEATHER ZIPPER AND BUCKLE DALIS BOOTIES SIZE 9.5 , NEW SKECHERS GO WALK 4 PROPEL WOMENS COMFORTABLE CASUAL SHOES US 9.5Aigle Women's Aiglentine Wellington Boots - Black , Man's/Woman's FitFlop Quartz Fino Midnight Slides New product Excellent performance Suitable for colorPleaser BABY PINK & WHITE Spectator Mary Jane Pumps 4" High Heel Size 6USGentle Souls Women's Everett Mule Putty Leather Comfort ShoesNIKE Women's MD Runner 2 Eng Mesh Running Shoe , Minnetonka Women's El Paso II Moc Taupe Suede Comfort Shoes , Salvatore Ferragamo shoes women Size 7.5 BNWB , Susan Bennis Size 6/36 Green Ostrich HeelsNine West Womens Elenah Pony Dress Pump- Pick SZ/Color. , Jeffrey Campbell Kima Shoes Black Suede New With Box! , Saucony Women's Ride 10 Running Shoes, Grey, 11 B US , Nike Men’s Air Flight Falcon Dark Grey/Black Royal 397204-044 Basketball Sz 14! , Converse CTAS II OX Black Volt White Counter Climate 153541C (152) Men's Shoes , Nike Air Foamposite One Knicks Size 13 Orange Blue Cavs 314996-801 2014 , ASICS T819N Mens Noosa FF 2 D US- Choose SZ/Color.Bates Men's M-8 Combat Boot,Desert Tan,4 EW US , Lacoste Men’s Avantor Sneakers - Choose SZ/Color , Nunn Bush Men's Jefferson Black Smooth Leather Business Shoes , Brooks Brothers Mans Black Full Strap Penny Loafer Golden Fleece USA Made 10 DConverse Women CTAS Dainty OX 551659C Sneakers Laser Blue RRP BCF73 , SAUCONY JAZZ EDGE LOW SNEAKERS WOMEN SHOES ORANGE/BLUE 1773-7 SIZE 5 NEW , PUMA METEOR WN'S-W Womens Meteor WNs Running Shoe- Choose SZ/Color.Nike Womens Nike flex 2017 RN Fabric Low Top Black/White/ Anthracite Size 8.0Puma By MIHARA YASUHIRO MY-28 Shoes Sneakers Size 37 (7). White & Silver LeatherCMP Kinos WMN Snow Boots WP Women Bootee Boots - comfy and warm Snowboots - NEW , JEFFREY CAMPBELL BOOTS HIGH-HEELS WEDGES SNEAKERS US 5 GENUINE LEATHER DESIGNERJUSTIN BOOTS Women's 5 - BLACK LEATHER WESTERN COWBOY COWGIRL BOOTS - Distressed , ANTHROPOLOGIE GEE WAWA HORKY BLACK ANKLE BOOTIE sz,8.5/38.5 (AS IS) ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    naturalizer 34 Rozene Knee-High/ Comfort Boots, Comfort Banana Nread Leather, 4 US/ 34 EU dc0e658