Never miss an update

Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: New condition in original box, a few minimal scuffs as pictured. Box is a little distressed.
Style: Fashion Winter Boot Brand: Teva
Color: Black Fastening: Zip
Material: Leather
Never miss an update

Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98 -

    Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98
    Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98
    Men's/Women's ADORE-1021 Many varieties the most economical have fun , Men/Women Spring Step Women's Happy main category fashionable Full range of specificationsWomens 8 M Franco Sarto Rider Riding Boots Tall Brown Leather Knee High Back ZipMr/Ms SKY-1023 Aesthetic appearance real have funMan/Woman Propet Women's TravelFit Bootie Good design Orders are welcome Various latest designsMen/Women Baretraps Charidy Women's Boots Black Beautiful color Primary quality Comfortable and natural , Steve Madden Women's Laurie High-Top Fabric BootNIB Anthropologie Black Suede Ruffled Side Zipper Ankle Boots 37/ 6.5 , Schutz Women's Bingi Black Suede High Thick Heel Pull-On Chic Ankle BootieMan/Woman Stiletto Boots Special purchase Orders are welcome classic style , Clarks Women's Gilby McKinley Duck BootAntonio Melani Size 7.5 Black Knee High Katera Boots Leather/Suede $199Pappagallo Women's Cognac Brown Leather Knee High Boots Size 10 MGentleman/Lady Fox Riding Boots Practical and economical modern Comfortable and naturalMojo Moxy Burlesque Black Fringe Suede Platform High Heel Boots NEWCorso Como Women's Laura Leather Side-Zip Knee-High Boots Black , Vince Bendra Black Womens Shoes Size 6 M Boots MSRP $198Men/Women Dr. Martens Serena Women's Boots Black Adequate supply and timely delivery comfortability VariousSteve Madden Rocoo Boot Size 6 Tan , KEEN Women's Waterproof Elsa Boots, Size 9.5, Beluga Color, New with BoxHarley Davidson Motorcycle Biker Boots Women's Size 6.5 MBorn black leather boots, size 8, side zip, newCat Womens Charli Boot size 8.5 blackMr/Ms Baretraps Crosby Women's Boots Black The color is very eye-catching Make full use of materials Caramel, gentleMan's/Woman's ELECTRA-3050 Wear resistant Preferred material Preferential priceWomen's Naturalizer Kala Bootie Saddle Tan Leather size 8.5 , NEW DOLCE VITA STONE CAMBRIDGE KNEE HIGH LEATHER RIDING BOOTS WOMEN'S SIZE 8Gentleman/Lady ASPIRE-1019 New market High-quality materials Different styles and stylesNew Womens Ariat 10011926 Mirabelle embroidered Tawney Leather Cowboy Boot
    Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98 ->Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98 -
    Splendid Women's Delroy Loafer Flat - Choose SZ/colorNike Air Vapormax Flyknit 2.0 Black Grey Men Running Shoes Sneakers 942842-001 , DJANGO & JULIETE WOMEN’S CHAMPAGNE RED LEATHER SNAKE “KANIN” SANDALS SIZE 39 NEW , Authentic CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN New Simple Pump 120 Patent Leather Black SIZE 38COCLICO WEGDE COMFORT TAN GREEN LEATHER SANDALS WORK SHOES SZ 37.5 US 7 , Gentleman/Lady Women's Gold Loafer Size 9.5 feature Win highly appreciated Very good color , PAUL GREEN CLOVER BLACK SUEDE LEATHER FRINGE THONGS SANDALS SHOES 7.5 NIB , Dance Sweet Girl Women Shoes Block Heels Ankle Strap Buckle Velour Beads BowknotLAKESHI Pumps Women High Heels Fashion Wedding Women Shoes Sexy High Heels , Sweetest Christian Louboutin Nude New Simple 120 Patent Leather Heels 40 NEWNEW BORN NEA LEATHER SANDALS WOMENS 6 F25305 , TEVA VERRA MODERN STRIPES BLUE WALKING HIKING WOMENS SANDALS SIZE US 7/NEW , Matiko Women's Eldora Leather Gladiator Sandals Retail $150 Size 10LEVI'S NEW Mens White Turlock Shoes BNWT , Nike Pegasus 92 Oremium Black Silver Grey White Sz 13 844654-003 , Adidas High Top Shoes Canvas Black White Plaid Letter A Checkered Mens Sz 8.5 , Bates E06601 Mens SRT Special Response Tactical 7" Boot, Black,11.5 Med , Brand New Nike Roshe Ld-1000 Trainers 844266-401 SZ US M 10.5Nike Zoom Lebron XI 11 Sz 13 Akron vs Miami Lakers James , MINT Nike Kobe 8 VIII Cool Grey/Green XMAS Christmas Prelude GS 7Y Wmns 8.5New Balance M530LC Lost Classics Shoes Sneakers New Size 12 MensAsics GELBurst 22 GE [TBF34G-9020] Men Basketball Shoes Black/PinkNike Air Jordan Retro 1 High OGVANS MID SKOOL LITE LX BLACK / WHITE SHOES NEW AUSTRALIAN SELLER old school , Cole Haan Men's Oxford Shoes Size 9 NEWMen Buckle Rivets Pointed Toe Formal Business Dress Patent Leather Punk Shoes USFABIO RUSCONI Shoes 075971 Black 35 , SAM EDELMAN Women Gray Leather Stylish Boots Size 9.5 , Thierry Rabotin wedge heel slip on ankle bootie brown suede 37.5 7.5 leopard , TOPSHOP PREMIUM VAMP BOOTIES Black Leather Pointed Toe Sexy Ankle Boots 7 Shoes
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Teva Nopal WP Side Waterproof Leather Nopal Black Tall Boot 1012437 Black Side Zip Winter sizes 4cf0f98