Never miss an update

Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea




Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: New without box - pristine
Brand: Paul Green Style: Loafers
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7 UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 4.5
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.) Color: Gold
Never miss an update

Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea - blurrypron.com

    Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea
    Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea
    Gentleman/Lady Andrew Charles Womens Loafer Brown CAMILLA Clearance price Wholesale trade Very good colorManolo Blahnik Shoe Low Heel Animal Print Suede Sandal New Size 40 1/2Proenza Schouler Flats Black Suede Loafer Snakeskin /2 US 9 1/2 , Delman Natural Snakeskin Pumps high heels 7MSAS Twin Tripad Comfort Black Brandy Lot Slide On Loafers Women's US 8.5MMr/Ms Women's Drew Shoe Orchid Mary Janes Outstanding features New design Official website , Lanvin Shoe Coral Leather Ballet Flat 39 / 9New Freebird Nola Cognac Women US 8 M Shoes Slip On Leather Mules Flats Pointed , Aquazzura Belgravia Brown Suede Espadrille 38 8 Worn Once!! MINT!! , NIB Tory Burch Ludlow Patent Petit Croc Print Driving Driver Loafers Size 9Authentic BURBERRY Printed Silk Lundie Ballerina Ballet Flats Size 6.5 ExcellentNIB Tory Burch Bryce Flat Thong Sandals in Spark Gold Pick a Size , NIB Tory Burch Reva Ballet Flats Shoes Cobra-Embossed Black Natural 9 MTieks By Gavrieli Black Leather Ballet Flats Size 8Stuart Weitzman New Manila Blue Womens Shoes Size 8 M Flats MSRP $455 , Tory Burch Square Toe Gold Logo Flats Jitney Green Patent Leather Ballerina 9NEW Women's Cole Haan ZeroGrand D44484 Wing Oxford Navy Size 6.5BTIBI, OLGA FLATS WITH ROUND TOE, WOMENS, BLACK SUEDE, US 7.5M, NEW IN BOXGENTLE SOULS Womens Black & White Striped Leather Sz 7 M Loafers NEW! 204308 , AGL Attilio Giusti Leombruni Grommet Black Suede Studded Flats SIZE 41 , NewbarK Womens Oxfords Size 9 Gold Metallic Leather Charlie Loafers New , Mephisto 100% Leather Upper (Women's) S 9 B Brown Flat Slip On Walking ShoesStuart Weitzman Mulearky White Womens Shoes 10 M Clogs & Slippers MSRP $398 , Dansko Woman'sTandy Cordovan Burnished MJ US Size 8.5-9.0 (Euro 39.0)NIB Womens Sperry Saltwater Misty Shearling Duck Boots in Navy STS99715 Size 7.5 , New Stwart Weitzman Snake Skin Jeweled Loafers 8.5 W BlackJimmy Choo Dreya studded D'Orsay Kitten Heeled Flats Pink Size 39 / US 9 , nwob FRYE MELANIE T-STRAP SLIP ON FLATS 3471192-ICE Gray Size 7.5M ANB , MM6 Silver Metallic Leather Platform Flats Shoes - size 38 ,
    Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea - blurrypron.com>Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea - blurrypron.com
    Versace 19.69 V105 VELOUR BORDO boots Women's Bordeaux US , Skechers Relaxed Fit Larson Trainers in Black & Brown 64833 , Gentlemen/Ladies Clarks Women’s Dove Madeline Chelsea Boots Not so expensive low cost Direct business , FRYE Womens carspm ballet Closed Toe Ballet Flats, Denim, Size 5.5 , Kenneth Cole Leather Ballet Flats Gunmetal Pewter Grey Round Ballerina ShoesNew Django & Juliette Bescara Tan Womens Shoes Casual Shoes FlatFlamingo 809 Black Fringe Platform Ankle Strap Shoe 8" High Heel 5-10 , Women's Peep Toe High Block Heels Buckle Slip On Slippers Sandals Cow Leather wiPaul Green Lexi Black Peep Toe Bootie Size AU 4 / US 6.5NIB Anthropologie tan Nubuck Leather Leopard Trim Pointy Zip Ankle Boot 36/5.5-6Dolce Vita Women’s Athletics Shoes, Black/White/Green Size 5 , Propet TravelWalker II - Active - Women's - All Colors - All SizesNine West Jeranna Wedge Heel Espadrilles Sandals, Dark Natural, 10 US , New Balance Men's Fresh Foam Cruz Running Shoe,Military Urban Grey/Stone Grey,9 , Saucony NYC DXN Trainer S70189-1 Black Mesh Suede Rare Shoes Medium (D, M) MenNew Balance 574, NB574WNY, White / Blue / Grey, Classics, Leather, Size 13 , NIKE Air Max Torch 3 Men's Running Shoes (11.5 D(M) US)Gentlemen/Ladies Shoes Skechers Arcade-Vontae Black Men 51559-BLK Promotion Online export store General product , A1923 A Diciannoveventitre Augusta Sneakers Shoes Horse Leather 43 44 10 11 , JORDAN RETRO 8 RICHARD HAMILTON RIP CITY Promo Sample Pistons - Size 14Armani Jeans men's leather ankle boot 10 11 black B6574New Florsheim Everett 7 EEE black (962)Gentleman/Lady 100% Authentic Stacy Adams Dress Shoes Great variety Pleasant appearance Reliable reputation , **NEW** WOMEN'S PRINCE T22 (CHINA MADE) BLACK/BLACK TENNIS SHOES. 8P985-010 , New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Vongo V3 Running Shoe , 1807 adidas ORIGINALS SWIFT RUN Women's Training Running Shoes B37719 , FILLING PIECES Steel Runner women sneaker FP 37 US 7 (rrp:)Nike Wmns Air Vapormax Flyknit 1 2 Women Running Shoes Lifestyle Sneakers Pick 1 , Rockport Women's Total Motion Cherene Boot, New Taupe Shiny Python, 6.5 MGentleman/Lady BCBGeneration Women's Bg-creen Ankle Bootie Customer first Price reduction Pick up at the boutique
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Paul Green Gold Lenny Paul US Perforated Loafer Green US 7 e4044ea
    Flats
    >
    ;