Never miss an update

Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Size: 6 M US
Style: Does not apply Color: Tan
MPN: NMLB0026-1 Department: womens
Model: NMLB0026-1 US Shoe Size (Women's): Does not apply
Brand: Naughty Monkey UPC: 884886681634
EAN: 0884886681634
Never miss an update

Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd - blurrypron.com

    Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd
    Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd
    Jessica Simpson Womens Calvey Ankle Bootie- Pick SZ/Color. , Kenneth Cole REACTION Women's Vin Win Ankle Bootie Boot black 10 M USDurango Lady Rebel RD3471 Womens Light Blue/Brown Saddle 10" Western BootsJustin Boots Women's Gypsy BootAged Bark6.5 B US , Very Volatile Womens Braya Ankle Bootie- Pick SZ/Color. , Cole Haan Women's Elion Boot Chestnut Leather 7 B USAquatalia Womens Wanda Winter Boot Espresso Size 7 M USOld West Cowboy Boots Womens Snip Toe Leather Lined 7 B Tan Fry LF1541FRYE Womens Dara Harness Chelsea- Pick SZ/Color. , Old West Cowboy Boots Womens Goodyear Leather Vintage Charcoal LF1587Kamik Women's Rogue 9 Waterproof Winter Boot Black 8 M US , ECCO Womens XpEd. III GTX Hiking- Pick SZ/Color.PRE-Owned RUDSAK Tarin Leather Wedge Booties 7.5MPleaser Blondie-R-3011 silver stiletto thigh high dual platform boots sizes 5-11ECCO Womens Ukiuk Short Snow BootEU/5-- Pick SZ/Color.Man's/Woman's Pleaser DEL600-23/BPU/M Womens Boot- Choose SZ/Color. New product Win the praise of customers retail price , Demonia Women's Asst100/Bvl Boot Black Vegan Leather 6 M US , Macie Bean Western Boots Womens Floral Dakota Darling Blonde M8037Laredo Runaway 5404 Womens Gaucho Nutty Mule Leather Western BootsCalvin Klein Gladys Womens Equestrian Boot- Choose SZ/Color.Calvin Klein Womens Pammie Over the Knee Boot- Pick SZ/Color.Roper Women's American Beauty Western Boot Brown 8 M US , ARA Womens THELMA Black Gore-Tex Lined Ankle Boots Size 9 W (43492)Demonia Women's Grip101/Bca Boot Black Canvas 9 M US , crocs AllCast II Luxe Boot Womens Snow Boot- Choose SZ/Color.Salomon Womens Ellipse 2 Mid Ltr Gtx W Hiking Boot- Pick SZ/Color. , DEMONIA 7" Platform Punk Gogo UV Reactive Neon Pink Green Panels Ankle Boots , Dr. Martens Women's Delphine Red Arcadia Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/ColorNoble Outfitters Womens Muds Cold Front High
    Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd - blurrypron.com>Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd - blurrypron.com
    Pleaser CLASSIQUE-3011 Womens Clas3011/Wpu Boot- Choose SZ/Color. , Pelle Moda Women's Adrina Ankle Boot Beige 7 M US , Alaia Woman Black Suede Peep Toe Platform Ankle Booties Size 39 , Ariat Women's Berwick GTX Insulated Country Boot , New Supersoft Pellegrino Black Womens Shoes Casual Boots LongSpenco Siesta - Women's Slide - Canvas Tan - 7new STUART WEITZMAN "Boytoy" walnut brown suede logo buckle flats shoesNIB Converse All Star Ox Sequins Sneaker Black White Gold Sz 9 WomensDonald J Pliner Valen Women's Black Bootie 9MPleaser DELIGHT-668 Women's Black Satin Heel Platform Criss-Cross Straps SandalsMANOLO BLAHNIK Red Suede High Heel Strappy Open-Toe Sandal Pump Shoe 10-40 , LANVIN $1,075 NIB Brown & Tan Leather Strappy Wood Wedges 41Manolo Blahnik Chaos Ankle Strap Sandal in Nude Size 39.5 $725Womens Gladiator Chains Nightclub Shoes Stiletto High Heels Zipper Party Sandals , Boutique 9 Women's Lizzee Black Strappy Leather High Heel Sandal , ALLBIRDS Purple Plum Wool Runners Men's Size 11 I73Adidas BB7117-9.0 Limited Ed. Busenitz Veg Tan Leather Shoe - Mens PaleNEW NIKE MEN'S JORDAN MELLO M11 BASKETBALL SHOE Gray/Red 716227-015 *** , CONVERSE CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR CT AS HI 1970 BLACK EGRET CORDUROY 153985C 8CLARKS Men's Unelott Mid Chukka Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Johnston Murphy Sheepskin Derby Oxfords Beige Wing Tip Brogue Shoes Men's Sz 10M , New! A TRIBE CALLED QUEST Vans SK8-Hi Shoes Sneaker Mens Womens ATCQ Gold Black , McRae Industrial Men's 11" Safety Toe Wellington MR85344 , British Collections Men Original British Walkers Playboy Old-School Shoes BlackAllen Edmonds "VERONA II" Italian Loafers 13 EEE Brown (682) , Fila Disruptor II Premium Repeat - Women's Yellow 00079743 , Hoka One One Women's Gaviota WIDE 1019624 in Blueprint Surf the Web Sz 6-10 NEW , Women Casual Pointed Toe Stiletto High Heels Genuine Leather Zip Ankle Boots , KEEN Brown Leather Comfort / Walking Ankle Boots Women's Size 9.5 , Man's/Woman's NIB Schutz Boots Size 5 Beautiful color product quality Lightweight shoes ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Naughty Monkey Women's 3484 Poncho Boot mayhemcommer-3485 Tan 6 Boot M US da25bcd
    Boots
    >
    ;