Never miss an update

NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: new
Style: Stilettos Color: Blue
Heel Height: High (3 in. to 4.5 in.) Occasion: Formal
US Shoe Size (Women's): 5 Brand: Nina
Material: satin Heel Type: Stiletto
Features: rhinestones
Never miss an update

NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa -

    NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa
    NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa
    Silver Rhinestone Pageant Prom Bridesmaid Bridal Kitten Heel Sling Back Shoe , Jessica Simpson Red Maurina Platform Wedge Sandals Multi Baja Red Muse Snake 7.5Chic Women's Stilettos Pointy Toe Slip on Suede Ladies Shallow Mouth Heels Shoes , NEW Ruby Shoo Miley Court Shoe Round Toe Grey Pink / Cream UK3-8 EU36-41 Bridal , Pretty *ANTONIO MELANI* Cream Metallic Patent Leather,Peep Toe,4" Pump/Heel, 9M , Womens 8 8.5 38.5 Joan Helpern Signature Hand Made Italy Black Velvet Shoes Pump , Womens Rainbow Color Ankle Strap Leather Shoes High Heel Party Stilettos SandalsIvanka Trump 'Oasia' Ankle Strap Suede Pumps Heels Shoes 7.5 Berry Red $129.95 , VINCE CAMUTO WOMEN'S DONNA HIGH HEEL PLATFORM SANDAL IN 8.5 M PURPLE NIBNIB Missoni Women's Black & Brown Heels Shoes - Suede Chevron Upper , Marco Santi Analisa Champagne Color Soze 8Gredos Womens Platform High Heels US 7 White Black Leather Slip-On spainstylish women wedge high heel platform riding ankle boots punk high top shoes US , Bruno Magli "Italy" Gray/Croc Leather Sling Back Heels/Peep Toes - 6.5M - GR8!Ruby Shoo Khloe Sandals Shoes Sz 3 - 8 Red / Black & White Chunky Floral , Beverly Feldman Wos Shoes Heels Kitten US 9.5M Brown Textured Leather chain 5502 , Sexy Womens Leather Platform Block High Heel Shoes Ankle Strap Sandals Open Toe , Men's/Women's Stuart Weitzman Strap Sandal Size 9.5M Special purchase First batch of customers Cheap orderNew Womens Real Leather Open toe High Wedge Slingback Party Shoes Summer Sandals , Betsey Johnson Gown Women's white w/ jewels satin open toe pumps sz. 5 , Boutique 9 New Womens Tultra Medium Brown Leather Heels 10 M Shoes700 BLK Women's High Heels (Purple Burst)Women Stilettos Ankle Sandals Cut Out Gladiator Peep Toe High Heels Rivet ShoesNina Womens Carolyn Peep Toe Classic Pumps, New Navy, Size 8.5 , NEW DESIGNER NINA BLACK/ WHITE ANIMAL PRINT PONY HAIR POINTY TOE HIGH HEELS 8.5SCHUTZ Thalyta Platform Grape Purple Suede Retro Ankle Strap Flatform SandalsPointed Stiletto High Heel Luxury Padlock Belt Buckle Ladies Banquet Shoes Zsell , Gladiator Womens Open Toe Stilettos High Heel Party Shoes Blingbling Sandals Sz , Calvin Klein Womens Cassian Closed Toe Ankle Strap Mary Jane Pumps
    NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa ->NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa -
    Reebok Furylite JF Jacquard Fade Black White Mens Shoes Trainers Sneaker V69500Gentlemen/Ladies Harold Boots Lachlan Roper Year-end special promotions a good reputation in the world Highly appreciated and widely trusted in and outClarks Ladies Georgia Black Shoes E Fitting (R38A) (Kett) , LADIES BOGS NORTH HAMPTON SOLID BLACK WARM INSULATED WELLIES BOOTS 71781 SIZE 8 , Men/Women Pleaser KISS-201-2 Elegant appearance Moderate cost classic style , Dr. Martens Women's 1461 Zip "Aunt Sally" Black Leather (Size US9) New ultra max , Badgley Mischka Dawn ivory satin heels size 8.5 new in box bridal , Women Open Toe High Stiletto Crystal Heel Rhinestone Slipper Sandals Shoes Party , ROCHAS Pink Gold Fringed Heels Shoes Pumps Bridal Wedding .00Flowers Rhinestones Open Toe Stiletto High Heel Shoes Ankle Strappy Sandals SizeThalia Sodi Womens Raeef Satin Open Toe Formal Slingback Sandals Navy Size 8.5 , Aerosoles Women's Soft Drive LoaferNIKE 315122-071 Air Force 1 Shoes Mens Sz 10.5M in Black Maize Steelers Sneakers , Saucony DXN Vintage S70369-5 Navy Silver Mens Suede Nylon Low Top Trainers , NEW BALANCE 247 LUXE SUEDE SZ 12 ICONS PACK ORION BLUE NAVY GREY MRL247N3Nike Air Max Invigor Mid Running Shoes Obsidian Solar Red 858654-401 sz 9.5 95 , Air Jordan 8 Phoenix Suns size 10.5Mens Genuine Leather Cuban Heels round toe Show Zip Chelsea Shoes Ankle BootsTwisted X Boots Men's MRS0059 Ruff Stock Cowboy Boot Bomber/Ivory Leather SizeValentino Garavani Rockstud Untitled Sneakers NY2S0931BHS 0BO Limited AuthenticGravati For Richard's Perforated Medallion Derby In Dark Brown Calf 9 1/2 M $625Pair Of Kings Men Top Kicker Black Leather Moccasin Parigi Soft Loafer Shoe , Nike Women's Air Max Thea Hot Lava Sunset Glow 599409 801 Size 12 = Men's 10.5 , Womens High Top Thick Bottom Breath Casual Sport Shoes Girls Strap Sneaker SboxSpring/Autumn Style Bow Ankle Boots Women Round Toe High Heels Shoes , UFCW 8430 Steel Toe Vibram Sole Green Boot Military Tactical Jump Womens Sz 6.5WWomens Dingo Peace Sign Cowboy Boots 6.5 Pointy Toe Harness Western Shoe BrownBELLE Sigerson Morrison Nicki BOOTIES Womens size 9 M Tan Suede BOOTS New in Box , B JORNDAL Bjorndal Womens Rachel Wedge Heel Chukka Bootie ShoesTorrid Circus By Sam Edelman Over The Knee Black Boot 12.5 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NWOT Nina Nina New York York Blue Heels,size Heels,size 5 42a08fa