Never miss an update

Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Material: Leather
Occasion: Casual Pattern: Solid
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 9.5 Color: Black
Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.) Style: Cowboy Boots
Brand: valentino UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384 -

    Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384
    Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384
    NIB $1,150+ PRADA Buckle Ankle Side Zip Boots Ankle Bootie Brown Leather 41 - 11 , Givenchy NWT "Noir" Black & "Marron" Brown Leather Block Heel "Show" Boots SZ 40Christian Louboutin Classic PARIS Brown Leather Ankle Booties Boots Shoes $1095Authentic Louboutin Boots knee high patent leather studded great conditionNew sz 7.5 / 37.5 Jimmy Choo Harmony Black Suede Over the Knee Heel Boot Shoes$995 Salvatore Ferragamo Tall Leather Black Hidden Wedge Riding Boot US 7 NEWStuart Weitzman - THE TIELAND Over-The-Knee Boot, Black -Size 8 M Retail$798.00 , Stuart Weitzman Thighland Over the Knee Stretch Suede Walnut Brown Thigh 7 NEW , STUNNING NEW SOLD OUT MANOLO BLAHNIK OKLAMOD BLACK SUEDE ANKLE BOOTS , New sz 7.5 / 38 Christian Louboutin Toot Couverte Black Leather Pump Bootie ShoeNWOB Dior Dioreve Signature Heel Ankle Mesh Embroidered Boots 37.5 7.5 $1465NIB Christian Louboutin Love Is A Boot 100 Black Red Spike Heel Ankle Bootie 38NWOB$2995 Brunello Cucinelli 100% Leather Monili Beaded Slip On Bootie 37/7 A181Chloe Susannah Susan Susanna Leather Studded Buckled Ankle Booties Boots CipriaAquatalia Black Suede Fable Buckle Heel Knee High Boot Shoe 8.5 NewBALENCIAGA CEINTURE METAL BUCKLE BURGUNDY CUT OUT LEATHER ANKLE BOOTS 40 326290NWD $2595 Brunello Cucinelli 100%Leather Monili Platform Beaded Boot 37/7US A181Yeezy Season 4 Stretch Canvas Point Toe Ankle Boots Shoes Heels Beige Size 36-40 , VETEMENTS $1,530 Demna Gvasalia slanted heel black leather cowboy boots 35 NEW , RICK OWENS Green Brown Ribbed Leather Ruhlmann Wedge Mid Calf Boots 38.5 NEWSergio Rossi Matrix Over the Knee Boot Black Stretch Suede Sz 36 Thigh High Boot , $ 1100 Roberto Cavalli Ankle Boots Gold Snakes 37 , 38.5 VALENTINO Rockstud Biker Boots Black Leather Moto Women's Shoes 8.5Tom Ford Brown Leather Mid Calf Western Cut Stiletto Boot SIze 8.5Valentino Garavani Women's Leather Rockstud Toe Ankle Boots Shoes US 5 IT 36 , $1195 Jimmy Choo Harlow 80 Gray-Taupe Suede Studded Ankle Booties Boot 39-8.5 , New MANOLO BLAHNIK PASCALARE S.Velukid Grey Suede Boots SHOES Heel 40.5 , Manolo Blahnik EPAL Striped Suede Over The Knee Boots Size 40 US 9.5 9 , NIB VALENTINO Rockstud Boots Leather Long $2151 AUTHENTIC
    Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384 ->Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384 -
    Roper Women's Phoenix Embroidered Short Western Boot Snip Toe - 09-021-0977-2028Sergio Rossi Black Stretch Leather Pointed-toe Knee-high Boots Size IT 35.5 US 5 , New In Box Womens Dolce Vita Rhea Black Suede Knee High BootsSergio Rossi Piper Nero Scarpe Donna Boot A47350 40 / 9.5 Black New W/Box , Asics Mexico 66 Onitsuka Tiger Moon Rock Grey Mens Running Shoes D4J2L-9190Man's/Woman's Pleaser SEDUCE-1049 Blk Pat () New Listing Quality and quantity guaranteed renewed on timeNike Free 5.0 Womens Running Trainers 724383 600 Sneakers Shoes , Mustang 1099-502-1, Womens Hi-Top Trainers, White Wei 1, 5.5 EUWomen's shoes Ballerinas leather model SENEGAL Us size 3 to 12Pleaser VANITY-440 Womens Vanity-440 Mary Jane Pump- Choose SZ/Color.D&G Dolce And Gabbana Slingback Stiletto Denim and Leather 39.5 , Fluevog Womens Hi Choice Kristen Wingtip Spectator Pumps w/ Heart Heel sz 10.5Mr/Ms Black Velvet Jimmy Choo Shoes Elegant and sturdy set meal Price reduction SimpleNew sz 7.5 / 38 Stella Mccartney Elyse Mahogany Platform Wedge Heel Oxford ShoesNEW $95 MUK LUKS Beth Platform Wedge Sandal Womens Sz 9 Cognac Vegan Leather , Vans VAULT UA Old Skool LX "Italian Leather" Cielo SneackersNike Air Zoom Grade Black White Quick-Lacing Mens Shoes Sneakers 924465-001 , Vans Men's Court Mid Black Suede Gum Skateboard Shoes Choose Size , Nike Free RN Motion Flyknit Mens 834584-004 Size 8New Balance MSONIBS 2E Black & White Performance Lightweight Running Shoes NB2013 NIKE AIR JORDAN RETRO III 3 OG FIRE RED SIZE 11Men's/Women's Nike Metcon 1 AMP The color is very eye-catching Order welcome ExportKith x nonnative x adidas UltraBOOST ATR Mid US Size 5.5 Black/Patchwork DB0712 , Mizuno Morelia NEO 2 Men's Football Shoes P1GA185062 A 18L , Clarks Men's Desert Boot Sz US 13 M Black Leather Chukka Boots Shoes $140.00Creative Recreation CR4LOC-BLK / WHITE Lo Leather Casual Men , Magnanni Brown Woven Kiltie Tassel Loafers Mens Size 8.5 D A15UnArmour SpeedForm Velociti Record Equipped Womens Running Shoes 1292818 001CHARLES JOURDAN Bottes Fourrées Daim Marron Fourrure Synthétique T 36/36.5 TBE , women's 12.5 tassel ankle boots pointy toe wedge high heel black shoes suede
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Valentino Leather Multiple Rockstud Multiple Stone Heels Stone Boots Sz 91 $1795/2 US EU39 1/2 $1795 5381384