Never miss an update


Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: These shoes have been previously . PLEASE NOTE that they have some creases, scuffs/scratches, and are slightly on the heels and soles. Please refer to picture(s). These shoes are very close to brand new condition.
Brand: BCBGeneration Color: Blacks
Style: Fashion - Knee-High Shade: Black Leather
US Shoe Size (Women's): 8.5 Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up)
Width: Medium (B, M) Material: Synthetic
Never miss an update


    STEVEN by Steve Madden Women's Nc-Padre Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/color , VINCE CAMUTO CRACKLE BROWN LEATHER STUDDED CLOGS 5.5" HEEL SIZE US 10 HOT , New Sperry STS82061 Maya Belle Suede Grey Women's Chelsea Boots 8.5 US , DV DOLCE VITA Womens Gray Suede Sz 10 M Platform Booties 216774 , Vince Camuto Fermel Slouch Tassel Grey Suede Leather Boot Mid Calf SZ 5 NEWDONALD J PLINER Buriel 3 Black Leather Equestrian Riding Boots Eu 35 US 4.5/5ANYI LU Suede/Reptile Pattern Ankle Boots Size 7 $495Womens STEVE MADDEN "JASPERR" black leather ankle boots shoes sz. 7 $160 , Corso Como 'Enrica' Black Quilted Suede Leather Knee High Boots Womens Size 9 M*Steven Steven Madden Insight Black Pebbled Leather Midi Wedge Tall Boots 6 NEWWomens HUNTER ORIGINAL raspberry rubber mid calf rain boots sz. 5 $170OLUKAI ELIMA mid calf buckles zip brown crackle oiled leather boots 7.5 , Charles by Charles David Women's Gunter Fashion Boot, Taupe, Size 9.5New Sperry STS82061 Maya Belle Suede Grey Women's Chelsea Boots 6 USSteve Madden Women's Slayer Taupe Over The Knee Boots Sz 9M 2106*DEMONIA Emily-315 2" P/F Goth Punk Alternative Ankle-High BootSonora SN1046 Size 6B Womens Riley Rough Out Western Cowgirl Boots SAND NEW!Womens SOFFT brown leather knee high boots sz. 10 M NEW!Steve Madden Koma Over Knee Women's Leather Black Boot Sz 7 M 4495 * , Womens ENZO ANGIOLINI black leather riding boots sz. 6 NEW! $210 , Steve Madden Munch Military Leather Boot Brown Women Sz 7.5 M 5669 * , ATTITUDE WITHOUT LIMITS COWGIRL WESTERN LEATHER BOOTS SIZE US 8 HOT VINTAGECatherine Malandrino Bast Black Leather & Suede Tall Motorcycle Boots 8.5 NEW , BORN Brown / Bronze Leather Knee High Boots, Size 8.5 / 40Steve Madden Troopa Leather Boot Brown Women Sz 7.5 M 4018 * , Womens ADAM TUCKER "KAPLIN" black leather mid calf boots sz. 5.5 M NEW! $170 , LOUISE ET CIE Womens 'Zalia' Brown Leather Sz 5 M Ankle Booties 228989Cole Haan Gwynne Tall Knee High Fashion Boots D15634 Dark Brown Suede Womens 7.5Man's/Woman's Guess heels wooman boots Clearance price Year-end sale Current shape
    Catherine Malandrino Pasta Women's black faux pearl over knee boots sz. 8 , ECCO Footwear Womens Women's Rivas 45 Wedge - Choose SZ/color , Arcopedico Womens Lolita Slip-On Black 40 M EUPRADA ICONIC SCALLOPED SEXY Wingtip Platform Oxfords US 8.5 I LOVE SHOESMesseca Coraline Platform Shoes...Sz: 7.5...Color: Azalea NIB...Retails: $169 , NIB NEW $188 ADRIANNA PAPELL ISABELLE CALF LEATHER PREMIUM R DESIGNER BOOTS , Jessica Simpson Carys Platform Sandals 174, Nude, 10 US / 40 EULONG TALL SALLY BILLIE HIGH VAMP SANDALS BLACK Size 11 , Womens Nike Air Max Torch 4 Running Shoes sz 8.5 White Turq 343851 100 Sequent , CLARKS Women's Saylie Jade Sandal, Sand, Size 11.0 , Converse Star Player Ox Black Khaki Mens SuedeTrainers , Vans x Van Gogh Skull Classic Slip On Slides Men's size 4.5 Women's US size 6Mens Nike Roshe Two Flyknit 844833-401 Racer Blue/Racer Blue Brand New Size 12 , NIKE AIR JORDAN 11 XI RETRO LOW  "GEORGETOWN" 528895-007 SIZE 13Air Jordan 3 Retro Crimson - Size 8 , Timberlan Black Work Boots Alloy Safety Toe/Slip Resistant Size 13 NIBCaterpillar Men's Streamline Comp Toe Work Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorAsics Gel-Lyte V H6Q4L-5252 Rioja Red Suede Mesh Casual Shoes Medium (D, M) MenMAISON MARTIN MARGIELA HIGH-TOP SNEAKERS IN BLACK OSTRICH LEATHER SIZE 41 , Men's White | Multicolor Diagonal Fashion Rhinestones Boots , Mizuno Wave Sky Running Shoes - Women's Size 9, Tile Blue/Silver/Safety YellowMerrell Men's Jungle Moc Taupe Suede Mr. Classic Slip-On Shoe Size 13 US 48 EU , Women's Asics GT-2000 6 Lite-Show Running Shoes White Silver Limelight Size 7.5Ariat Unbridled Dixie - Brown - Womens , Womens Nike Metcon 3 DSX Flyknit Black Hyper Punch CrossFit SZ 6.5 (849809-009)Gunmetal Lupo Slip-On Sneaker Women's Size 9.5 , Nike Free Tr Connect Fitness Women's Shoes SizeMatiko Over the Knee Black Leather Boots Low Heel Side Zip Womens 6 Mint Uppernaturalizer Tabbie Comfort Ankle Boots 038, Dark Brown, 8.5 W USStyle & Co. Womens Zoey Closed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots Black Size 5.5
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.


    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund