Never miss an update

Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7

Item specifics

: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Product Line: Jordan Retro
Style: Basketball Shoes Brand: Jordan
US Shoe Size (Men's): 10.5 Model: Jordan 5
Never miss an update

Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7 -

    Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7
    Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7
    Nike Air Jordan Retro I 1 High OG NYC 23 NY Black Gym Red Wolf Grey 715060-002Air Jordan 3 Retro “Fire Red” Size 8 , Mens Nike Romaleos 3 Freedom AA3154-400 Midnight Navy/White Brand New Size 13NIKE LEBRON 15 FRUITY PEBBLES 897648-900 FRUIT LOOPS PINKDS NIKE AIR JORDAN RETRO V 5 136027-031 Supreme Green Bean SIZE 12.5Authentic Nike Air Force 1 low insideout midnight fog green bean grape 9.5 2006 , *NEW AIR JORDAN RETRO 13  WHITE/ BLACK -TEAM RED SIZE 12.5  Brand New with boxUnder Armour Curry 1 PE Splash Party Mens Basketball Shoes White Size 12.5Nike SB DUNK LOW TRD QS Black PIGEON Jeff Staple QS NY 883232-008 IN HAND DS2018 Nike Air Max Deluxe QS SZ 4 Triple Black Reflective 3M OG AV2589-001 , Nike Air Jordan 6 VI Retro "Wheat" Golden Harvest Flax Brown Tan Mens sz 9 Shoes , AIR JORDAN RETRO 12 PRM JAPAN INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT Size 8 , NikeLab x RICCARDO TISCI Air Force 1 HI Sz 9.5 100% Authentic Nike RT AQ3366 601 , DS 2017 VANS OG Era LX UNDERCOVER TEMPLES / RED Jun Takahashi SZ11Men's Blue Pre Own Italian Leather Prada Shoes Pristine Cond Size US 10.5Jordan Retro 13" He Got Game White/True Red-Black (Big Kid) (5.5 M US Big Kid)Nike AIR JORDAN 2012 DELUXE ‘JORDAN BRAND CLASSIC’ Men’s Sz 8 Orange 484654-801 , 2013 NIKE KOBE VIII 8 SYSTEM PIT VIPER PURPLE DYNASTY GREEN GLOW RASPBERRY 11 , Gentleman/Lady Size 10.5 Nike Sb Many varieties delicate Beautiful and charmingNIKE AIR JORDAN 10 RETRO "I'M BACK" SUMMIT WHITE SIZE MEN'S 13 [310805-104]Adidas Mens Yeezy V2 “Cream” Size 10 LOOKS LIKE NEW!!! 100% Authentic , Nike SB what the Dunk High Fiveone0 Size 6 New 646552-037 Thomas CampbellASICS GEL-Kayano 23 (men's) ___ Size 13 ___ Last 1, T646N-4907, blue, stability , Man's/Woman's Nike LeBron 11 Away 616175001 Not so expensive Win the praise of customers Great choiceNike Foamposite Pro Silver Black Size 9.5 , Adidas UltraBOOST SNS x Social Status - BY2911 US6 100% AuthenticMen's Brand New Air Vapormax Plus "Neon" Athletic Fashion Sneakers [924453 009]BAIT x Diadora Men Astro Boy B Elite white 10.0Adidas NMD R1 PK Running Shoes Athletic Sneaker CQ2445 Khaki Green White Sz4-12
    Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7 ->Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7 -
    Corral Women's Western Cowgirl Orix Studs Embroidery Square Toe Boots E1393 , $1495 NIB GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI YVETTE METAL TOMAIA MEKONG I47032 GOLD 36.5 6 , NIKE AIR FORCE 1 HI SE TRAINERS 860544 002Mens Grenson Slip On Black Leather Moccasins Formal Shoes Monza 7777 , DUNE LONDON WOMENS SUEDE & LEATHER NAVY BLUE OXFOR PLATFORM SHOES SIZE 38EU/8USA , NANETTE LEPORE Bella Women Heel Sandals (9M, Ivory) , Formal Women's High Heels Block OL Pumps Shoes New Fashion Faux Leather Chic&& , Gorgeous Giuseppe Zanotti Patent leather and Rhinestone Sandals! Size 37!ANIMAL PRINT HORSE HAIR YVES SAINT LAURENT OPEN TOE PLATFORM HEELS SIZE 11 , Blowfish Women's Brueke Wedge Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , 2012 Nike Black Anthracite Black Zoom Rookie sz 8 472688-010 jordan adidas lot , Mens Kyrie 3 III Sneakers New, White / Hyper Cobalt Blue Devils 852395-102 sz 10NEW VANS X KARL LAGERFELD QUILTED CLASSIC SLIP-ON BLK/KQULT MENS 6.5 WOMENS 8.0 , REEBOK x URBAN OUTFITTERS-VENTILATOR stylemen's size US10-300 PAIRS MADENike Dunk High Premium SB Salt Stain 2014 Black/White Gym Red Size 9.5 VNDS Rare , PUMA BASKET HEART PATENT WN'S / ROSEJORDAN ZOOM TENACITY WHITE GUM LIGHT BROWN AH8111 115 MENS US SIZESVNDS Nike Air Jordan 13 XIII Retro Barons Hologram Grey White Size 11 TropicalGiuseppe Zanotti X Zayn Dark Brown Leather Zip Up Boot $1295 Size 41 EUR/ 8 US , Man/Woman Carrera Jeans CAM825020 flagship store Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience Amoy , Allen Edmonds Clark Street Black Spit Toe Oxfords Size 13 BNIB Y.R.U. YRU Flash Hologram Sneakers in Atlantis Black SIZE 6, 7 - 35% OFF , Keds Women's Anchor Sneaker Black Canvas Sneakers , Men's/Women's Demonia Women's Ranger 301 Black Velvet elegant Beautiful Modern modeNike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Womens 880560-603 Pink Berry Running Shoes Size 10NIKE LUNAR FORCE 1 SKY HIGH PREMIUM IRIDESCENT WEDGE QS SZ 7.5 [704518-100]Mr/Ms Oxford Savannah Waterproof Women's Leather Boots Fine processing Various types and styles various kindsSuede Shiny Chain Side Zip Checked Ankle Boots Combat High Heels Pointy Shoes , Fahsion Patent Leaher Pointy Toes Womens Ankle Boots Hollow Out Block Heels SZ , Crocs Women's Leigh-Ann Ankle Strap Leather Wedge - Choose SZ/color ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Gentlemen Gentlemen/Ladies/Ladies Jordan 5 Retro good Low CNY CNY 10.5 service the most economical Explosive good goods e627ef7
    Athletic Shoes