Never miss an update

NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: PRADA
Heel Type: Block Style: Pumps, Classics
Heel Height: High (3 in. to 4.5 in.) US Shoe Size (Women's): 7
Material: Suede Width: Medium (B, M)
Country of Manufacture: Italy Color: Blue
Pattern: Solid UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c - blurrypron.com

    NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c
    NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c
    Escarpins Chloé Lauren en daim noir T40STUART WEITZMAN Nudistsong NIB Black Suede Leather Ankle Strap Sandal Heels 7.5 , NIB PRADA DARK BROWN SUEDE CUT OUT ELASTIC PLATFORM SANDALS PUMPS 38.5 $820Fendi Leather Platform Pumps Original: $690.00 Size - 39/9 , Manolo blahnik 37 Satin Light Gray Heels With Crystal Only Wear 2 Times$735 Balenciaga Purple Leather Glove Open Toe High Heel Sandals Shoes 38.5 / 8Giuseppe Zanotti Chantal Blue Womens Shoes Size 8.5 M Heels MSRP $895NIB Christian Dior Flat Loafer Espadrille Black Canvas 39 Sunset Sequin Flower , Saint Laurent Paris Pink Leather Pointy Toe Pumps Size 39 NIB YSL Classic $595 , DOLCE & GABBANA TROPICAL FRUIT PRINT LEATHER SHOES WEDGE SANDALSNew Miu Miu by Prada 3D Floral Satin Mule Slides Sandal Pump 38 Nudo , Giuseppe Zanotti Design Women's High Heel Classic Pumps Shoes Sz 6 7 8 9 10 11New Tarine JIMMY CHOO Dark Magenta/Nude Shoes Size:39 leather suede spring heelsNew Authentic Givenchy Black Leather Suede Real Fur Heels Boots Classic 38 EU , Christian Louboutin Simple Red Pump Size US 8Gentlemen/Ladies Christian Louboutin Slingbacks Phyton Hells Sz.39 Promotion First grade in its class Popular tide shoes , Saint Laurent Janis 105 Metallic Miroir Pumps Platforms 40 10DOLCE & GABBANA Lurex Mary Jane Pumps Shoes ALEXA w. Crystals Brooch Pink 06716Blackstone Women's JL72 Ankle Boot , Manolo Blahnik Mary Jane Campari Pumps Heels Black Patent Leather 8.5 38.5 , Man's/Woman's Christian Louboutin Apostrophy Stiletto 35.5 Economical and practical a good reputation in the world Don't worry when shopping , Men/Women Christian Louboutin Daffodile Watersnake Pumps High security Skilled manufacturing leading the fashion , Giuseppe Zanotti dress sandel Black Womens Shoes Size 10 M Heels MSRP $995 , NEW YSL Saint Laurent 208786 Napa Cognac Leather Tribtoo Platform Shoes 42 12 , YSL Yves Saint Laurent Vieux Rose Janis 105 Pumps Platforms 38 , Jimmy Choo Ivette Strappy Sandals Champagne Glitter Size 41 , NIB Jimmy Choo Mutya Gold Snakeskin Point Toe Pumps Heels New 7 37 ($775)Saint Laurent Pale Pink Grainy Leather Janis 80 Pumps Platforms 37 7 , Christian Louboutin Fifi Red Patent Leather Sz US 10
    NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c - blurrypron.com>NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c - blurrypron.com
    FitFlop Women's Banda Sandal - Choose SZ/colorGB35 Rivey Peep Toe Wedge Pump Sandals 934, Oro, 7 USUS Shoe Size Women Slip On Black Leather Comfort Casual Formal Dress Loafer Pump , Versace 19.69 E08 FIORI NEVE ballerina shoes Women's Multicolor US , Etienne Aigner Gotham Navy Blue Leather Slip On Tassel Moccasins - Size 5.5 Mara Women size 8.5 Black leather Suede Pump Bow CareerNine West Women's JINEYA Pump, Black/Pewter Leather, Size 7.0 EvTj , Giuseppe Zanotti Black Leather Peep-Toe Wedges. Size 8.5 , ladies sandal Naot Secret black size 41/10Adidas Samba Classic Mens Soccer Shoe SKU 034563 Size 11.5 , Converse 1BG002 Canvas Boot Army Green Men's 10.5 - Women's 12.5 Mfg Ret $100 , 1802 adidas Cosmic 2 Men's Training Running Shoes CP8695 , NIKE AIR MAX 1 PREMIUM SIZE UK9.5/US10.5/EUR44.5 875844-200 , autumn retro Mens suede high top dress chukka dessert ankle boot formal shoes , JOHN FLUEVOG Mens Seventh Heaven Angel Black Leather MOTORCYCLE BOOTS Sz 13.5 , NEW Men's Dockers Pacific Acorn (Brown) Leather Casual Tie Shoe , MENS POLO RALPH LAUREN FAXON LOW TURQUOISE/PINK/GRAY CASUAL SHOES SIZE 8 , Ikon Gobi Mens Brown Green Suede Leather Desert Chukka Boots Size , Men's Shoes Kenneth Cole Just My Type Suede Loafers KMH5SU008 Navy *New*Skechers Men's Flex Advantage 2.0 Talamo OxfordNew Cole-Haan Shawl Tassel 7.5 D mahogany (3288)Skechers Women's Flex Appeal2.0-Newsmaker Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorWestern Chief Men's Plush Indoor and Outdoor Slipper MoccasinNike Women's Air Max Sequent 2 Black Grey White Knit Running Shoes 852465-002Merrell Women's Moab 2 Vent Hiking Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , adidas DB1697 Womens CF Lite Racer CC W- Choose SZ/Color.Women's adidas AlphaBounce Instinct Clear Orange/Silver/Grey Three CG5591 ORG , Nike Sf Air Force 1 Mid Womens Style : Aa3966 Vast Grey Womens Size 6 , Christian Dior Blue Encre Fusion Crystal Flower Sneakers SZ 40 10 Trainers $1100NEW FRENCH CONNECTION BLACK LEATHER BOOTS SIZE 7.5 SIZE 8 M 38 38.5 $165
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NIB $650+ PRADA Slant Block PRADA Heel 29991 Pump Shoe mogochinese-29996 Dark Blue Suede Pointy Toe 37 - 7 4141f9c
    Heels
    >
    ;