Never miss an update

Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Material: Synthetic
Color: Desert Sand/ Desert Sand Width: Medium (B, M)
Pattern: Solid Brand: Nike
Style: Running Shoes US Shoe Size (Women's): 12
Country/Region of Manufacture: China UPC: 826220973845
Never miss an update

Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba - blurrypron.com

    Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba
    Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba
    Propet Washable Walker - Women's Casual Or White Leather - 11 X-WideNike Air Zoom Cage 3 HC Tennis Shoes WMNS Gray Orange Quartz SZ 6 -918199-001 , New Balance Womens 996 Mid Retro Sneaker Boot Shoe WH996BXW Japan Rare Size 5.5Under Armour Womens Size 11 SpeedForm Velociti Graphic Re Grey Running ShoesWMNS NIKE AIR ZOOM 90 IT GOLF CLEATS "RORY MCILORY ( 844648 001 ) SIZE 6.5adidas Adizero Adios 3 Running Shoes Women's Size 8.5 Gray Continental Sole , Women's Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Tri Zip High Top, 544859C Size 7 Black/GoSALOMON S-WIND INCA 38-40.5 NEW running ultra speedcross crossmax xa pro , WOMEN'S BROOKS GLYCERIN 15 size 7 I!WORN AROUND 15 MILES! RUNNING SHOES ! , Adidas Originals Women's Adilette Lilo Slides Size 5 to 10 us CQ2907Womens Nike Air Max 2012 Orchid Pink 487679-114 Running Shoes Sz 8 , NIKE ROSHE ONE wmn USszs: 7; 8 BLACK Lightweight Running Casual Shoe 511882-094 , NIB Puma Fenty Pointed Patent Leather Creeper Sz.9Nike free 5.0 (GS) women shoes size 6 Youth running training shoesAdidas x Overkill x Fruition Women's Tubular Elastics Runners S.E. 9 US APE , Bronx Women's Neon Trees Peach Satin Print Fabric Size 38 MWMNS NIKE CITY LOOP TECH FLEECE OBSIDIAN/BLACK RUNNING ( AA1097 400 ) SIZE 7 , New Nike Womens LF1 Duck-Boot Air Force Shoes Boots AA0283-001 Sz 7.5 BlackNike Women's Free RN Flyknit 2018 Running Sneakers Size 5.5 White/Black , Marc Joseph Grand Central Flat Women’s Sz 5.5 Navy Metallic Scrawl 4799 OfficePantofola d'Oro Multi Color Textile & Leather camo Print Euro Track Sneaker 39Nike Air Max 90 Ultra Essential fitness running shoes 724981 006 size 10,MUST SEE FABULOUS $179.99 2017 NEW BALANCE 998 W998WA WOMEN 9.5 B EEEUC LN , Nike Womens Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Running Shoes Size 8.5 Ice Blue 880560 404 , NIKE Women's Juvenate Sneaker, Palm Green/Legion Green/Black/White, 9 B US , adidas Women's Originals Stan Smith - Women's BB5154 Core Pink Size 10 NWTNew Nike Womens SF AF1 SE PRM premium Shoes Air Force 1 AJ0963-600 port wine 9 , Women's Nike Volley Zoom Hyperspike Size 5.5 (585763 001) No BoxNike Air Max Thea Ultra Flyknit Pure Platinum/Pure Platinum 881175-002 ,
    Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba - blurrypron.com>Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba - blurrypron.com
    Womens Clarks Maypearl Rayna Black Leather Low Heel Ankle Boots D width Shu Size , Versace 19.69 P51 PASHA BORDEAUX CHIANTI boots Women's Bordeaux US , Gentlemen/Ladies Pajar Women's Davos Boot Excellent craft Excellent performance Global salesClarks Ladies Garnit Colette Black Trouser Boot Sizes 6&8 D Fitting (R29A)Miss Albright Anthropologie Mary Jane Shoes Heels Red Strawberry Mod Cloth 9.5 , NEW with box Chinese Laundry White/Silver Cap Pumps US8.5 , Womens Rhinestone Floral Embroidered Pointy Toe Block Heel Slides Retro Shoes SZNew Womens Color Stitching Med Stilettos Heels Pumps Leather Pointy Toes Shoes , Green Fluevog Hi Choice Jennifer Heels 7Large L Victorias Secret GOLD Glitter Slides Sandal Flip Flop NWT ShoeJosef Seibel Kira 09 Womens Platform Sandal 42 BR/11-- Choose SZ/Color. , Sam Edelman Womens Peters 2 Mule- Pick SZ/Color. , Finn Women's Jamaica Soft Leather Sandals Black Nappa 82519-014099Womens NIKE LUNARTEMPO 2 WVT Running Trainers 845533 013 , NIKE ZOOM BLAZER MID DECON SB 8.5 DECONSTRUCTED RIDGEROCK SAIL BLACK AH6416 200 , Nike Air Max Uptempo Black White 311090-005 Size 8-9.5 , Adidas X Day One ADO Crazy Team Clear Brown Black White BY2869 7-13.5 wang boostNike Kobe XI Elite Low Flyknit iD Multicolor 2016 Men SZ 10 [903712-993]Belleville 390DES Hot Weather Combat Desert Tan Vibram Sole Mens 4 R BootsNEW KEEN MENS PTC DRESS OXFORD LEATHER WIDE FIT SHOESMen's Shoe Lacoste Bayliss 318 2 Fashion Sneaker 36CAM0007042 WHITE NAVY NEWHigh top Women's Peep toe Hollow out Denim Sandals Platform Wedge Sneakers ShoesAdidas Women's Distancestar W Running Shoes W/ Spikes - Choose SZ/Color , adidas Originals Womens Flashback Casual Shoe Rose/Pearl Grey/Gum BY9307 , Report Women's Angel Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorNaot Women's Rianna Sandal Vintage Slate LeatherGentleman/Lady ara Women's Magaly 48523 Guarantee quality and quantity Quality First professional design , Alfani New Womens Carrie Over the Knee Black Fashion Boots 6 M Shoes NWB , Camper Geometric Wedge Sole Ankle Boots Black Suede / Leather Double Zip 39 8.5Vince Camuto Keliana Black Womens Shoes Size 7 M Boots MSRP $199
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Womens Size Nike Air Max 1 AQ6378-001 AQ6378-001 Desert Sand Sand Brand New Size 12 30fc3ba
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;