Never miss an update

Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Booties
Material: Leather Boot Shaft Height: Ankle
Color: Black US Shoe Size (Women's): 7
Brand: Patricia Nash UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb - blurrypron.com

    Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb
    Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb
    WOMENS VTG TONY LAMA USA BRN LEATHER LIZARD WING TIP COWBOY WESTERN BOOTS SZ 5 B , SCARPE DIEM WMN'S 13991 KNEE-HIGH MOTORCYCLE BOOT WSHD BLK LTHR US SZ 7 MCircle G by Corral Kids Brown Embroidery Western Boot E1157 , 206 Collective Women's Brinnon Black Leather Motorcycle Moto Boot size 7 B US , Brand New Franco Sarto Women's Lizbeth Wide calf Leather knee Boot Sz 6.5US,36.5Catherine Malandrino Bast Tall Black Suede Leather Boot - Size 6.5 US , Paulo Iantorno Women Ankle Boots /US 10 Narrow Brown Leather Pull-On Italy , Boden Vintage Style Tall Brown Leather Knee High Heel Pull On Boots Size 8 NWOBNIB Platinum Stinger Lo Women Boots WP10002 Sheepskin Water Resistent 9 10 , Ladies Womens Bent Rail Western ANTIQUED BOMBER BROWN Boots Justin 6.5 B 6 1/2 B , NEW! NIB! MATT BERNSON Black Diamond Leather Suede ROARK Riding Boots Sz 6 $295SEYCHELLES WMN'S SLAP ON THE WRIST BOOTS BLK LTHR US SZ RT 7/ LFT 6.5M MISSMATCHJ Crew Glazed Pecan Brown Buffalo Plaid Perfect Winter Boots 10Laredo Ladies Kadi Distressed Brown Cowboy Boots 5742 NewDIJE CALIFORNIA SIERRA BLACK GENUINE AUSTRALIAN SHEEPSKIN NEW TO THE MARKETSTELLE MONELLE Suede Leather Ankle Boot Booties Sz 36 Made In ItalySamuel Hubbard Womens Boot-Up Boot in Black Suede Size 6.5 , Corso Como 9118 Womens Black Baylee Vintage Calf Leather Knee-High Boots SZ 8.5M , Steve Madden Women's Trevur Buckle Block-Heel Booties Black Leather Size 5.5M , NEW Women's FRYE Melissa Harness Tall Leather Boot, Dark Brown, Sz 6.5 M - $438 , Ecco Bella Women's cognac leather double zip booties sz. 41 , NIB Smoky Mountain women's boots, gray, size 7MSpring Step Women's Endear BootieCole Haan Abbot Women's blue suede ankle booties sz. 5.5 B , MATT BERNSON - COLT BARK SUEDE CREAM SHEARLING ANKLE BOOT SZ 6 RETAIL $369 , Dolce Vita Women's Black Vix Thigh High Boot Sz 7.5 2823 * , WOMEN'S HUNTER BOOTS CORT BURNT ORANGE 8MECCO Women's Touch 35 black leather zip Booties sz. 40 , Durango women's Western Leather Boots RD3219 Tan size 9 M NEW
    Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb - blurrypron.com>Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb - blurrypron.com
    Women's Born size 7.5 Black Anthracite Felt Wool & Leather Oswego Knee Boots NEW , NEW Free People tan distress suede Decades Ankle Boots Bootie 37 / 6-6.5New Wild Rhino Tyrone Sand Mens Shoes Casual Sneakers Casual , BY695 MBT shoes black blue textile men sneakers , New Therapy Crescent Womens Shoes Dress Boots Ankle , Men's/Women's Eastland Womens crystal Closed Toe Mules Aesthetic appearance First grade in its class leading the fashionNEW Basque Portia Terracotta Leather Sandal Coral , Gentleman/Lady I35 Kacela2 Caged Rhinestone Pumps, Pewter Best-selling worldwide Let our products go to the world Brand feast , Man's/Woman's Pleaser SKY-301VL Crazy price Online renewed on time , P36 BALLERINES CUIR BLANC DOUBLE CUIR NEUF , SAS Women's Twin Moc Toe Slip On Black Flats , Pleaser Womens Clas20/R dress Pump 13US- Pick SZ/Color. , Cynthia Rowley Tan Leather Pumps Size 8.5 NWOB , JIMMY CHOO Black Satin Ankle Tie Sandals with Beaded Flowers at Front - Size 35New Roberto Serpentini Beige Patent Shoes Leather Made in Italy Size 39 US 9 , Christian Louboutin Bianca 140 Nude Patent Leather Pumps Heels Sz 41 , Sam Edelman Women's Dawson Wedge Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Balance Men's 574 Lux Rep Lifestyle Fashion Sneaker, Nimbus Cloud/White, 6.5 D , New $110 Nike Train Speed 4 AMP NFL Kentucky Wildcats Royal Blue/White sz 12NIKE HYPERVENOM PHANTOM II LEATHER FG MEN'S SOCCER CLEATS 747501-001 MSRP $300 , New PUMA Thunder Electric Size US 4 ~ 11 Unisex 36799 60Onitsuka Tiger by Asics Men's Mexico US 13 M Grey Leather Sneakers Shoes $110.00 , NIB $180 Converse by John Varvatos CT Hi Artisan Stitch Drill 150164C US Mens 12 , UNDER ARMOUR WOMEN'S CHARGED ALL-AROUND SPEEDKNIT SHOES SIZE 8 GRAY/BLACKVince Blair-12 Slip On Sneaker - Women's Size 8M, Blueadidas Originals Women's Ultraboost St - Choose SZ/ColorASICS Women's Gel-Quantum 180 2 Running Shoe , Nike Air Max 90 Womens Midnight Navy/Midnight Navy/Blue Moon/Sail/Black 81105400Carlos by Carlos Santana Women's Brie Ankle Bootie, Black (Women)Tony Lama Women's OL' Buck-TC1011L Western Boot, Black, Sizes 6,5B & 9.5B, New ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Patricia Ankle Nash Women's Rosetta Retail Ankle 29885 Boots Size 7 Black Leather Retail $225 fc07acb
    Boots
    >
    ;