Never miss an update

NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Basketball Shoes
US Shoe Size (Men's): 14 Brand: Nike
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77 -

    NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77
    NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77
    ADIDAS YEEZY BOOST 350 V2 GREY ORANGE "BELUGA 2.0" AH2203 KANYEY-3 PURE BOOST ZG KNIT WHITE BLACK SIZE 7 VNDS 100% AUTHENTICNew Bape A Bathing Ape Bapesta Kaws Orange x Green US11 29.0cmNike Air Zoom Kyrie 2 Sz 14 htm Multi Skills Academy promo sample rare og lot PEMan's/Woman's yeezy 700 size 7 men aunthentic Excellent value First grade in its class a lot of varietiesjordan 6 champagne size 9.5 new ds 100% authentic w receipt , BALENCIAGA Python Arena Pacific Blue 42" 9UKNike Kobe 11 FTB 869459 001 Men Sizes , Nike AIR JORDAN 1 RETRO HIGH OG 6 7 8 9 10 11 GYM RED aj1 royal bred chicago toeAir Jordan 1 x Off-White «UNC » - 15us/14uk/49.5eu *WORLDWIDE SHIPPING* , Nike Zoom Vaporfly 4% Ice Blue Shoes -Size 6.5 -880847 401 , ASICS Kith X RF SUPER GREEN SZ.10.5 Ronnie Fieg , DS NIKE KOBE ASTON MARTIN PACK ZOOM Kobe Complete V 5 HYPERDUNK Size 10.5Adidas YEEZY BOOST 350 V2 Triple White/ Cream White 9.5 *RARE* , OG 2003 Nike Air Zoom Generation Display Case AZG LeBron 308214-111 sz 10.5Yeezy Boost 350 v2 Beluga (Women Size US: 6.5) , Nike PG 2 Playstation Paul George PS4 Shoes -Size 11.5-AT7815 002 , Jordan1s bred 2016, size 9, BRAND NEW DS , OFF-WHITE Chuck Taylor All Star Converse 162204C size 5 DS 100% authenticNike Air Max 97 CR7 Portugal Patchwork AQ0655-600 LIMITEDNEW AIR JORDAN XXX1 CAL GOLDEN BEARS PROMO PE 31 GOLD WHITE NAVY SZ 12CLEAN Nike LeBron XI 11 SVSM Home PE Promo Sample Away MTAG Saint Mary Size 14Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High DB Size 12.5 345204-041 Doernbecher Royal Banned C , New In Box Deadstock (DS) rare authentic Zoom Kobe 4 IV USC Size 8Nike Off-White Zoom Fly Mercurial FK Black Volt Virgil Abloh AO2115-001 Sz 9.5 , Gentleman/Lady Nike Hyper Adapt 1.0 Black/ White High quality and low overhead delicate Cheap order , Supreme Nike Air Max 98 Snakeskin Grey 844694-100 sz 13 9.99/10 ONLY ONE ON EBAYNIB DS Nike Air Air Jordan VI + XVII 6 + 17 Countdown Pack Bundle SneakersADIDAS PHARRELL WILLIAMS HU HUMAN RACE NMD SOLAR PACK ORANGE SIZE 8.5 ,
    NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77 ->NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77 -
    Ferrini Women's Cowhide Cowgirl Boot - Square Toe - 82993-04 , El Naturalista Women's Colibri N495 Boot, Porto, 40 EU/9.5 M US , Bottes d'équitation Sergio Grasso P 37 2 cuir Marron Cavalière couture neuvesNew Django & Juliette Tetley Ocelot Black Womens Shoes Casual Boots LongMiu Miu Womens Pumps Size 38.5 8.5 Blue Satin Cap Toe Platform Mary JaneLOEFFLER RANDALL Arbella Platform Sandals sz 9. WORN ONCE $395LifeStride Women's Carla Dress Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorPuma Trinomic Zip Black - Mens - Size 11 , Converse All Star OX-Optical Men's Sneakers White (M7652)Balance Men's MW577 Black Walking Shoe - 10.5 4E US , NIKE AIR FORCE 1 LOW SUPREME DB DOERNBECHER CHAD 585195 003 SZ 11.5 , Nike Court Force Low Caol Uno Woven White Shoes 11 Mens , Man/Woman CONVERSE CHUCK TAYLOR 1970'S 162374C YELLOW Quality queen Beautiful appearance professional designAdidas Ultraboost Parley LTD Shoes Size 11Salomon Men's X Ultra Mehari GTX Hiking Shoes - Choose SZ/ColorNike Kobe 1 Protro Think 16 Close Out Final Seconds AQ2728-101 Mamba Sz 14 RARE! , Nike Epic React Flyknit Size 11.5 White Racer Blue AQ0067 100 Brand New NIB LtdCole Haan Men's Connery Moctoe Chukka Boot, Black, 11.5 M USAIR JORDAN 8 RETRO AQUA Sneakers Black Size US 10 JP 28 Men's Genuine Y51 , Stanley Field Low Cut Slip On Work Shoes Mens Size 8 Brown - NEWBostonian Luxe Men's Derby Oxford split toes Shoes Italy Black Leather Sze 13 MEcco Kallum Fashion Sneaker Gray Men Size11 , Under Armour Women's Fuse FST Size US 8.5 B(M) US Black/Glacier Gray/Penta PinkNike Womens Air Huarache Premium Shoes size 8 $120 NEW 683818 012Reebok Royal Ultra Sl Bare Beige/Digital Pink/White Womens Fashion Sneaker Size , VANS SK8-HI MARVEL CAPTAIN MARVEL SKATE SHOES MEN'S SIZE 5.5 WOMEN'S 7 , Nike Court Force Hi Premium Madeira/Madeira-Black Cheetah 317072-221 SZ 10Womens Autumn Winter Occiednt New Stylish Chic Color Stitching Suede Ankle Boots , Baffin Women's Coyote Slip-On Duck Shoe , Naturalizer Women's Ballona Wide-shaft Motorcycle Boot Dark Brown, Size 7 Medium ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NEW ORIGINAL 29993 NEW Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High mogochinese-29998 Banned 2011 432001-001 bred off white ded7c77
    Athletic Shoes