Never miss an update

Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 885487917221
Weight: 3.8 lbs EAN: 0885487917221
Dimensions: L 18.6 x W 11.8 x H 4.1 inches Brand: Pleaser
NumberOfItems: 1 MPN: DELIGHT-3019
PartNumber: DEL3019/WPU/M Binding: Apparel
ProductGroup: Shoes ClothingSize: Size 10
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: White Faux Leather/White
Style: Not Applicable Department: womens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10 M US
Never miss an update

Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef -

    Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef
    Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef
    Cole Haan Air Melanie Tall Rain Boots Black Patent Waterproof 9.5B Worn Once!COLE HAAN D4213 Women Embury Bootie Chestnut Brown Ankle Boots shoes 9.5 B,M,40Merrell Women's Eventyr Mid North Waterproof Winter Boot, Clay, 7.5 M US , NEW Free People gray blue Embroidered Distress Back Zip Ankle Boot 37 /6.5 -7 , Manitobah Mukluks Size L8 Ladies Mukluks Made in Canada Vibram Snow Boots GRUCJ SHOES Women's Kellen Dress Side Zip Bootie, Blue, 5 M USKelsi Dagger Brooklyn Women's Thea Wedge Bootie, Taupe, 8 M USSan Jacinto Women's Rio Vista Wide Calf Boot, Black, 6 M USJ SHOES Women's Belgrave Stacked Block Heel Bootie, Black-Bronze, 6 M US , Bogs Women's B-Moc Quilt Puff Snow Boot, Burgundy, 9 M USPleaser Women's Dagger-2064 Knee-High Boot,Black Patent,12 M US , Eric Michael Women's Vermont Black Boot 35 US Women's 4.5-5 M BBEARPAW Women's Karen Boot Dark Honey 10 BM USWomen Winter Luxury Fluffy Genuine Original Raccoon Fur Warm Eskimo Long BootsSperry Top-Sider Women's Juniper Quay Ankle Bootie, Black, 10 M USLifeStride Women's Maximize WS Riding Boot, Dark Tan, 8.5 W USLifeStride Women's Maximize WS Riding Boot, Dark Tan, 9 M US , Joie Women's Harmonee Winter Boot, Gesso, 35.5 EU/5.5 M US , Pleaser Women's Ado3019/Bpu/m Boot, Black Faux Leather/Black Matte, 9 M USCaitlyn Hess New Black Suede Flat Pull On Boot , Gentlemen/Ladies Merrell Women's Katia Waterproof,Black,8 M US Louis, elaborate Attractive fashion Very practicalAerosoles A2 Women's Log Role Boot, Black Combo, 5.5 M US , NEW ENZO WOMEN SHOES BROWN TALL KNEE HIGH BOOTS NIB 10 , NIB Anthropologie stone taupy gray Leather Side Buckle Inside Zip Ankle Boot 8 , Madewell $218 The Janice Boots in Suede 6 Darkest Olive F5076Doc Dr. Martens Triumph EXCELLENT CONDITION Size 6US 4UK , NIB Anthropologie gray Suede Strappy Back Whipstitch Edge Zipper Ankle Boot 8 , Pleaser Women's Del3019/wpu/m Boot Faux Leather/White, 7 M US , NIB Dr. Martens Unisex LEO 8-Eye Boot TMNT Collection Green T Lamper Reflective
    Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef ->Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef -
    Dolce Vita DV Engrid Boots Brown Leather Western Chic Brand New Retail $305NIKE JORDAN FORMULA 23 LOW TRIPLE BLACK 919724 020Roxy Tara Womens Boots - Brown All Sizes , Women sandals snake leather model HANAN Aus 2 to 10.5 , Boaonda Comfortable Clogs for Women - Bio Synthetic Clogs - Nursing/Work ShoesCHARLES BY CHARLES DAVID Womens 'Winnie' Black Ghillie Pumps Sz 7 M - 230790 , PLEASER ADORE-708MG Black Mini Iridescent Glitter Ankle Strap Platform SandalGold Rummy 1 Black 1 White Shoe Leather Taylor Says Platform Pump Heels 8.5 $170 , Bedstu Seneca Sandal - Women's Size 7 Brown , Sarto by Franco Sarto Women's Osborn Slingback Estate Grey Lux Brushed SuedeAsics Men's Gel Saga CHRISTMAS PACK Running Shoes Burgundy H41VK-2628 a2Nike Mayfly Woven Mens Running Shoes Sneakers Size-13 Royal Blue 833132-401NIKE DUNK HIGH 309432-741 PRO GOLD/MID NAVY-WHT MEN SZ: 12 ONLY DEAD STOCK SHOES , VANS YACHT CLUB [SZ 8.5] OLD SKOOL BLUE GREEN YELLOW MULTI SLIP LOW VN0A38G1R1Q , Jordan 2 “Concord” 100% Authentic ,Size 10.5Man's/Woman's Lebron 12 Easy to use a variety of Diversified new designNike Air Max 95 Essential Men's Shoe 749766-037 WOLF GREY WHITE 1 90 97Nike Air Jordan 12 2016 Wolf Grey University Blue Sneakers Size 10.5 flu bred og , Authentic Dunk High SB Fiveoneo. Size 12. Brand New. Comes with original box. , Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 V2 Butter sz US 7.5 F36980 Kanye West , #S MENS JUSTIN COWBOY LIZARD SKIN LEATHER BROWN BOOTS SIZE 10.5 DSPERRY TOP SIDER MENS BOAT SHOE BILLFISH 3-EYE DARK TAN SIZE 10 , EUC Ralph Lauren Purple Label Black Suede Chukka Boots Size 7 D Made in Italy , Reebok V68904 Womens Royal TransportFashion Sneaker- Choose SZ/Color. , WOMENS MERRELL ALL OUT BLAZE WOMENS BROWN WALKING/HIKING BOOTS SHOESDemonia Women's Shaker 55 Stacked Wedge Platform Ankle Boot Black Vegan LeatherAdidas NMD R1 Primeknit Sea Crystal Womens CG3601 Tactile Green Shoes Size 7.5Man/Woman Toe Warmers Women's On-The-Go Boot Brown Packaging diversity Sales Italy The first batch of customers' comprehensive specificationsSperry Top-Sider Saltwater Silver Textile/Rubber Waterproof Boots Womens Size 7M , JCREW $278 Studded Suede Ankle Boots 9.5 black shoes e1186
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Pleaser Women's Del3019/Wpu/m Del3019/Wpu/m Faux Boot, White Faux Leather/White, Leather/White, 10 M US 53ed2ef