Never miss an update

Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a

Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Reebok
MPN: CN0450_0 UPC: 4059319064032
EAN: 4059319064032
Never miss an update

Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a -

    Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a
    Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a
    Candice Cooper Womens Tamponato Trainers, Pink Confetto, 5.5 UKSuperga 2790 Acotw Linea Up and Down, Womens Low-Top Sneakers, Black 996, 2.5 , Geox Women s D Nebula G Low-Top Sneakers, Pink Cyclamenc8335 ,7 EUMjus Womens 823102-0101-0001 Trainers, Black ArgentoNeroArgento 0001, 4 UK , New Balance 410, Womens Trainers, Black BlackWhite Kbk, 4 36.5 EUNo Name Womens Arcade Sneaker Goat Suede Low Blue Size 6 UK , Rieker Women M6238 Hi-Top Trainers Black Size 5 UK , New Balance 410, Womens Trainers, Black BlackWhite Kbk, 5.5 38 EU , Geox Women D Nebula G Trainers,Pink Lt Pinkc8010, 38 UK , Aldo Womens Jacobe Trainers Bright White 70, 8 UK , Remonte Womens R1488 Hi-Top Trainers, Beige MuschelIce, 8 UKPuma Womens Muse Satin EP WNs Low-Top Sneakers, Black White, 7.5 UKGant Womens New Haven Low-Top Sneakers Beige Size 6 UK , Gant Womens Linda Trainers, Blue Marine G69, 3.5 UK , Remonte Womens R5501 Trainers, Grey staubArgento 42, 5 UK , camel active Rail 71, Womens Hi-Top Sneakers, Red Fire 03, 5 EU , Puma Womens Vikky VR Trainers, Green Olive Night 01, 7 UK , Puma Womens Basket Platform Perf Gum Trainers White Black-Gold, 5.5 UKVictoria Women 109203 Trainers Grey Size 40 , Puma Womens Muse Satin EP WNs Low-Top Sneakers, Black White, 8.5 UKCastaer Womens Carey8Ed Ss18033 Espadrilles, Bone Natural 2010, 7.5 UKAdidas Women's Stan Smith Pk W Originals Casual ShoePuma Womens Vikky Platform Elastic Low-Top Sneakers, White White, 7.5 UK , Fiorucci Womens FDAA004 Trainers, Black Nero, 6 UK , Remonte Womens R1401 Low-Top Sneakers, Grey AltsilberNegroAsphaltSchwarz 01 , Icepeak Women 675204100I Low-Top Grey Size 5 UKGentlemen/Ladies Reebok Womens Trainers, Black, 8.5 UK Crazy price Affordable Tide shoes listIGICO Women 8760200 Low Trainers Grey Size 6 UKHub Womens Fuji Ds Espadrilles, Blue Dark Navy 065, 40 40 EU
    Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a ->Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a -
    Punk Women Real Leather Knee High Boots Low heel Front Zipper Casual Winter Shoe , FRYE Womens Harness 12R Black Leather Mid Calf Riding Boots Shoes Size 7 IP-531 , Black Star SWEETGRASS BLACK Womens Ladies Cowboy Cowgirl Boots New All Leather , JIMMY CHOO 'Dylan' black leather gold buckle biker boots 38Men's/Women's ADIDAS ORIGINALS. SUPERSTAR 80s service Affordable Selling new productsLadies Clarks Warmlined Leather Ankle Boots Style - Orinoco OaksJessica Simpson Aeralin Wedge Slingback Sandals 375, Black, 8.5 US / 38.5 EU$495 Sz 38 7.5 Celine Blue Pony Hair Espadrille Slip On Loafers ShoesCynthia Rowley Women's Tarzan Pink Suede PumpNEW MODARE ULTRACONFORTO VISIT WOMENS COMFORT WEDGE SANDALS MADE IN BRAZIL , Sam Edelman Yaro Ankle Strapped Heel-Women's Size 6.5M Black , New Balance Womens Atlas Grey Fashion Sneaker Size 10 (31867) , New! Mens New Balance M560cp7 Running Shoes Size 15 4E XWIDENIKE ROSHERUN ROSHE RUN GAME ROYAL BLUE/BLACK/ORANGE NY KNICKS/METS mens SHOESS81004 Adidas x Pharrell Williams Men Barricade 2017 white chalk white dark blue*ULTRA RARE* NIKE LAB TIEMPO 94 VETTA SP Mens 10.5 nikelab premium NSW qs soccerSkechers Men's Go Golf Elite 3 Approach LX Golf ShoeMens buckle suede leather shoes Chelsea ankle show boots pointed toe casualCATERPILLAR CAT ARGON MENS COMPOSITE TOE WORK/INDUSTRIAL SHOES/DURABLE ON EBAY! , Cesare Bertelli Loafers Mens Burgundy Leather Shoes Size 9.5 M with TasselsMen Shoes Nunn Bush Dixon Cap Toe Oxford Brown Leather Comfortable 84724-200 , Vans Sk8 Hi Slim Zip (Leather) Wind Chime/Blanc -Women's 5Saucony Women's Triumph ISO Running Shoe, Blue/Red, 12 M USNike Wmns Air Max 270 White Solar Red Ultramarine Women Running Shoes AH6789-101Jimmy Choo Women's Dawes 100 Suede Open-Toe Sandal Black Suede Evening ShoesMizuno Wave Prophecy 2 Women's Running Shoes Purple Magic US 6 , Lugz Women's Brace Hi 6" Work Boot , BANANA REPUBLIC Women's Brown Suede Slouchy Boots Wood Heel Gold Studs Sz 8.5 , Sexy 3" Heel Brown Matte Knee High Boots w/ Elasticated Panel DIV2018/BNPU , Walking Cradles Women's Gaston Ankle Boot,Brown Distressed Leather,US 5 M
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Reebok Royal Ultra SL, Womens Trainers, Reebok Pink 29347 Chalk 38.5 PinkWhite, 5.5 38.5 EU 01dbb4a
    Athletic Shoes