Never miss an update

See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Item which there is little feeling of wearing, and is not worried about a dirt and damage
Brand: SeeByChloe Style: Not Specified
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7.5 Color: Black
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd - blurrypron.com

    See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd
    See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd
    Rodo S8254 086 128 boots Women's Camel USLouisiana Mens Black Slip on Pointed Toe Calf Length Western Heels Leather Boot , Versace 19.69 G02 CAMOSCIO SMOG boots Women's Dark Grey USWomen Pointed Toe Over the Knee Boots Waist High Winter Long Boots Slip On , Versace 19.69 G04 VELOUR BLU 969 boots Women's Blue US , Versace 19.69 P51 PASHA MILITARE boots Women's Dark Green USCELINE Black Suede Leather High Block Heel Ankle Boots Round Toe Shoes Size US 5DZ542 MOMA US 7 shoes brown leather women ankle bootsCalvin Klein Womens Jaslina Closed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots Black Size 8.0 , New Rock NEOTYRE65-S1XX-S Women's All Leather Ankle Boots BLACKVersace 19.69 G02 CAMOSCIO TESTA DI MORO boots Women's Brown USANDRE Bottes à Talons Cuir Bicolore Rouge Cerise et Marron T 36 ETAT NEUFLIU-JO WOMAN WINTER ANKLE BOOTS BOOTIES CODE S63055 P0079 STIVALETTO BASSO YVO , Womens Over Knee High Thigh Boots High Heel Pointy Toe Leather Shoes Stiletto wilady sexy pointy Toe over knee thigh high Boots zip slim fit heels shoes leisureSergio rossi Shoes 628141 Black 39 , Versace 19.69 G03 VELOUR FANGO boots Women's Brown USVersace 19.69 P51 PASHA SMOG boots Women's Dark Grey USWomens High Heel Pointy Toe Printed Stilettos Over Knee High Stretch Boot us sz , HUNTER Women's Original Tall Olive Wellington Boots US 6M pv:Ladies vogue High Top Leather bloack high Heels Buckle punk Vintage shoes Hot SzJUNYA WATANABE Shoes 484868 Black MVersace 19.69 G04 CAMOSCIO SABBIA boots Women's Beige US , New Rock TR003X-S3 Womens Ankle Boots - BlackBOTTES FEMME EN CUIR NEUF DANS LEUR BOITE T.40 JEAN CHARLES DE CASTELBAJACNew Keen Gypsum Ii Mid Waterproof Womens Wide Fit Hiking Boots , BZ217 ISLO shoes black textile women ankle bootsVersace 19.69 G02 CAMOSCIO TAUPE boots Women's Taupe USVersace 19.69 G02 NAPPA MARRONE boots Women's Brown US ,
    See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd - blurrypron.com>See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd - blurrypron.com
    Naughty Monkey FUZZY Faux FUR BOOTS Genuine SUEDE Strappy Studs, Brown 7 , Stuart Weitzman Furgie Black Faux Fur Ankle Boots Size 8M D1529/ , Genuine Miss KG Womens Black Neeve Flat Loafer Shoes Work FlatsDJANGO & JULIETTE BALANCE BEIGE meshed flats! Very comfy! RRP$149! SALE!Drew Women's Rose Mary Jane Red Full Grain Leather Slip-Resistant (Non-Skid) , Propet Women's Evie Black Leather/Mesh Walking Shoes , Dansko Solstice Black Leather Button Detail Clogs Size 40Spring Step Manila Slip Resistant Clog Leather Womens Clogs , Madden Girl Vegan Multi Blitzzz Platform Open Toe Heels 7.5MChristian Loubouin Decolette 554 Size 36 NudeNine West McGlynn Ankle Strap Sandal - Women's Size 9.5M - NaturalMr/Ms New Nike Elite sneakers size 8.5 flagship store Optimal price Complete specificationsNIKE AIR FOOTSCAPE WOVEN CHUKKA QS 913929-700 FLAT GOLD OREWOOD DS SIZE: 11 , Jordan Men's Flight 9.5 Shoes NEW AUTHENTIC Black/Grey/White 654262-0052015 Nike Air Jordan 4 IV Retro LS SZ 13 Black Oreo Tech Grey Cement 314254-003air jordan retro 11 gamma blue size 7Woolrich Men's Bootlegger Bitter Black Leather/Wool SZ 9.5 MSRP 250$ , Ariat Men's Sierra Saddle Work Boot - Choose SZ/ColorTREZETA TACTICAL BOOTS 2002 USED BY RUSSIAN SPECNAZ CSN FSB ALPHA VYMPEL SZ 44EUPVC CONVERSE CHUCK TAYLOR ALL STAR HIGH TOP BLACK SHOES SNEAKERS Sz 10 DominatriSkechers Shape Ups SN 11800 Womens Athletic Toning Shoes White Size 6 , Guess Women's Josian Walking Shoe, White, 8 M USPuma WMNS Suede Gold women lifestyle sneakers NEW black 361862-01NB~Adidas CRAZYTRAIN ELITE BOOST Runing Pure Ultra energy Shoe gym~Women sz 10.5Man/Woman w.e.t.s. Trainers Techwear Crazy price stable quality Perfect processingShoes New Balance 247 V2 Lifestyle Beige Women WS247-FE , ASICS GelResolution 7 Clay Court Shoe Women's Tennis multi-E752Y.0193 , Man/Woman Bearpaw Leslie Women's Boots Black Diverse new design Online export store Elegant and robust menuNIKE W Nike Air Zoom Structure 21 904701-101 SUMMIT WHITE Size 12 , Aigle Boots Women's Rubber Pack Rain Boots Noir/Cyan Rainboots
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    See Chloe By Chloe Black Shoes Shoes 275770 Black d2584cd
    Boots
    >
    ;