Never miss an update

NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536




Item specifics

Condition:
New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: ECCO
Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.) US Shoe Size (Women's): 41
Color: Black/Black Patent Style: Sandal
Heel Type: Slim Width: M
Fastening: Velcro Material: Leather
Pattern: Solid
Never miss an update

NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536 - blurrypron.com

    NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536
    NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536
    Mizuno Women's Wave Lighting Z2 Volleyball Shoe, Black/Silver, 6.5 B USADIDAS WOMEN'S PUREBOOST X ALL TERRAIN BLK/WHITE/BLK RUNNING SHOE SIZE: 6NIKE AIR MAX 90 ESSENTIAL 616730-023 BLACK WHITE RUNNING RETRO WOMEN'S SZ 7 , NIB Nike Free RN Run Sneaker Blue Glow Black Crimson 831509-404 Womens Sz 10 , Nike WMNS Flex Adapt TR [831579-302] Women Training Shoes Hasta/Seaweed US 6.5 , Man/Woman ASICS GEL-Ziruss - Blue - Womens Aesthetic appearance New in stock Strong heat and heat resistanceNike Womens Air Zoom Mariah FK Racer Running Shoes Sz 7-9 Black White AA0521 100Women's Nike Cortez '72 SI Leather Shoes NEW Black / White , MSRP $125 , adidas Performance Women's Pureboost Xpose Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , Sketchers Shape Ups Mary Jane Shoes Sport Walking 11807 Black Size 9 WomensNEW Womens NIKE LUNAREPIC LOW FK 2 GYAKUSOU 10 Blue Fox Running Shoes 880287-400NIKE ROSHE RUN KJCRD Bronz/Blk/Sail/Wht WOMEN'S SZ 7 NEW 705217-700 AIR MAX QSNike Air Prestigo III Women's Pink White Low Top Size 7.5 #S78BNIB BASKETS SNEAKERS NIKE WMNS TENNIS AIR CAGE ADVANTAGE /US 7.5/New Nike Womens Free 5.0 BT Run Running Shoes 745383-001 Sz 7.5 Be TrueNike WMNS Air Max 1 Ultra Essentials [704993-401] Women Casual Deep Blue US 7.5New Balance Women's Minimus Sport Golf Shoe, - Choose SZ/ColorAir Jordan Nike True Flight Triple Black 342964 013 Basketball Shoe Womens 8 , 2018 WMNS Nike Air Jordan Modero 1 SZ 7 Mica Green Sandal Slide AO9919-300WMNS Nike Air Jordan Modero 1 SZ 12 Particle Beige Pink Sandal Slide AO9919-200 , New Saucony Ride ISO ‑ Womens Running Shoes S104441 sz 10 h306 , Under Armour 1285481 Womens SpeedForm Gemini 3 Running Shoes- Choose SZ/Color.{B39398} WOMEN'S ADIDAS ORIGINAL SUPERSTAR WHITE/GOLD *New*Lot of 4 Adidas Energy Boost - Skechers - Inov F-Lite 219 Running Shoes Sz US 9 , Vintage Nike Air Icarus Women's 9 Air Max 95 90 1 Running OG Original 90’s , Man's/Woman's NIB NIKE Air Max Thea High quality and cheap Upper material classic style , BASKETS SNEAKERS WMNS RUNNING NIKE JUVENATE /US 7.5/ , Womens Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Flyknit 881109-004 Black/White Brand New Size 6KARHU - Finland Synchron Classic Boa/Rose Dust Sneaker sz 8 - Only Worn Once!
    NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536 - blurrypron.com>NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536 - blurrypron.com
    Stiletto High heel Womens Pointy toe Sequins Over knee high boots Bling Stylish*NEW* $365 Joie Monte Ankle Boot with Cuban Block Heel in Cognac/Whiskey size 40 , NIB YSL Yves Saint Laurent Babies 90 Gold Chelsea Block Heel Ankle Bootie 36.5 , * NEW * Asics Lethal Testimonial 4 IT Football Shoes (D) (0190)nike air jordan son of BG hi top basketball trainers 512246 006 sneakers shoesBare Traps Corrie 2 Womens Boots Black 7 US / 5 UK , Man/Woman NEW Zazou Cora Black/Tan Sandal Black Excellent craft delicate At an affordable price , Prada Ladies Black Jewel Ankle Boot 1T985H New in Box , GINGER & SMART HEELS SHOES WOMENS ~ SIZE 39 ~ EXC COND BLACK / WHITE PATTERNGentleman/Lady Pleaser AMUSE-28 Special price Impeccable comfortable , Remonte D5870, Women s Hi-Top Sneakers, Silver Offwhite weiss argento weiss 80Naturalizer NAYA Women's ALOHA Size 6.5 Narrow Shoes Brown SandalsLadies Irregular Choice Ban Joe Bow Bridal Wedding Court Shoe Low Heel All SizesVogue Womens Horse Fur Point Toe Pumps Cow Leather Oxfords Mid Heel Party ShoesGentlemen/Ladies JIMMY CHOO Pumps animal pattern Harako Comfortable feeling Medium cost Elegant and robust menu , Gentleman/Lady Celine Patent Leather Pump Aesthetic appearance Stylish and charming Sales online store , Converse Women's Chuck Taylor All Star Perforated Canvas Low Top SneakerNew Adidas Streetball Originals D67600 Basketball Shoesmen's shoes SKECHERS 8 () sneakers black textile BX183-41Acronym x Nike Air Presto Mid Utility White Dynamic Yellow AH7832-100 size 8Mens loafers shoes British style brogues carved dress shoes formal shoes sizes 9 , Man/Woman Adidas Originals Women's Tubular Shadow Sneaker Aesthetic appearance auction Sales online storeShoes Nike wmns Kaishi GS 705492 300 Women's Moda sneakers Aqua Mesh Fashion , HOKA ONE ONE Womens Arahi Black/Peach Amber Running Shoe - 6 M , Nike Free RN Distance Woman's Running Shoe 827116 301 Size 6 , CMP Nietos WMN Snow Boots Women Bootee Boots - warm and comfy winter boots - NEWPunk Women Shoes Rivet Studded Buckle Cuban Chunky heel Rock Cowboy Ankle BootsINC International Concepts Hadli Women Boot (8.5M, Black)Cole Haan Linnie Black Suede Bootie Ankle Boot Size 7.5 B , Dolce Vita Sila Over The Knee Boot - Anthracite - Sz 5.5 M
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NEW ECCO Patent Felicia Sz Leather Wedge Dress Sandal Black 10 Patent Womens Sz 41/ 10 c498536
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;