Never miss an update

New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce

Item specifics

Condition: New with defects :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item. Possible cosmetic imperfections range from natural colour variations to scuffs, cuts or nicks, hanging threads or missing buttons that occasionally occur during the manufacturing or delivery process. The apparel may contain irregular or mismarked size tags. The item may be missing the original packaging materials (such as original box or tag).  New factory seconds and/or new irregular items may fall into this category.  The original tags may or may not be attached. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: New without box, Sample shoe, Pink smudging on top of left shoe (See pictures)
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7 Brand: New Balance
Color: Beige Style: Athletic Sneaker
Width: Medium (B, M) Product Line: 574
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce -

    New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce
    New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce
    20 Adidas Pro Model Gold Toe Womens BB2130 Black Gold Shell Shoes 6.5-10.5 , Asics Gel Resolution Tennis Shoes Berry/Coral/Plum Women's US 5.5 (C,2)ADIDAS WOMENS DEERUPT SZ 8.5 CHALK BLUE CORE BLACK CQ2912Womens Nike Air Jordan 1 RET HI PREM Size 11.5 (AH7389 107) No BoxWomens Nike Lunar Speed 3 New Running Shoe -429999-106NEW The North Face Women's Hedgehog Fastpack - WOMENS HIKING SHOES SIZE 6 , NIKE W Air Huarache Run Ultra Si 881100-200 MUSHROOM Size 10 , $150 Asics Tiger Gel Kayano Trainer Knit Lo Size 7.5 Mint Green H7N1N Womens , Air Force Premium 1 Brown Women Size 7.5 ClassicWOMENS ADIDAS ORIGINALS DEERUPT RUNNER SZ 7 ASH GREEN CORE BLACK CQ2911 , Saucony Hurricane ISO 2 Women's Blue & Silver Running Shoe - Size 6.5 , $198 Altra Womens IQ Interactive Running Sneaker Shoes, Black Coral, US 8.5 , New Balance Womens Classics 696 Sneakers Sea Slat White WL696OSAMerrell Women's Passage Gore-Tex XCR Fudge Hiking Trail Shoes Boots Size 6 , Nike Women's AIR HUARACHE RUN shoes Dark Stucco/Pale Grey 634835-027 bUnder Armour Womens 24/7 Casual Athletic Sneakers 1297010 997 Navy Blue Size 10 , adidas adiPure Adapt Womens Puple Light Barefoot Running Shoes RARE , Cole Haan Grand .OS Size 10.5 White Leather Sneakers New Womens Shoes , New Womens Nike Dunk Hi Ease Sneakers 896187 101 Sz 10.5 White Leather strap PP , {T6C8N.9320} Women's Asics GEL-Cumulus® 18 Indigo Silver *NEW*New Balance WW577VK Women's 577v1 Black Control Health Walking Shoes SneakersNIKE Air Force 1 Premium '07 BLACK / GOLD - 6 US WMNSNIKE WOMENS AIR HUARACHE RUN PREMIUM SZ 5.5 LINEN SAIL TAN KHAKI 683818 201 , Nike Size 11 Sneakers Flex Fury Running Shoes Pink Black White Yellow WomensNike Classic Cortez Leather SE Size 7 Women's Shoes Metallic Gold 902854-700 , Nike Lunarglide 8 Women's Running Shoe 843726 003 Size 8Wmns Nike Classic Cortez Leather 807471 103 Size 10 Women , Propet Washable Walker - Bone - WomensVans Women SK8-Hi Slim Zip - Iridescent Eyelets black VN0XH8IES
    New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce ->New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce -
    Irish Setter Work Women's Crosby Nano Toe 83214 BootSize 8 D , Donald J Pliner Dalis Short Western Boots 024, Tobacco Python, 9.5 USNew ALAIA Black Leather Grommet Eyelet Ankle Boots Booties 38.5 8.5 Retail $2225 , Men's Hush Puppies Shoes The Style -Bourton Idea , Gentlemen/Ladies Soda Women's Salsa-H Riding Boot New varieties are launched Quality First Excellent workmanship , NEW WOMENS CLARKS GABRIEL MIST LEATHER DRESS/WORK/CASUAL HIGH HEELS SHOESNew Ladies Women Naot Mika Slide Mule Clog Shoe Electronic Blue Size 38/39 7/8L K BENNETT Heels Pumps Beige Tan Nude Patten Career Size 36 1/2 US 6 #N5 , Sexy satin 4 1/2" rhinestone basic pumpSkechers Relaxed Fit Savvy Winsome Womens Slip On Shoes Pumps SizeMr/Ms Yves Saint Laurent tribtoo shoes Clearance price Reliable performance Global sales , OPENING CEREMONY NEW LEOPARD "CAMILLA" PLATFORM SANDALS / HEELS -- 37PRADA Shoes 452915 Yellow 35 1/2 , Fitflop Skinny Snake Leather Sandals Shoes 9 41 , Franco Sarto Polina Espadrille Wedge Sandals, Black Leather , MEN'S MIZUNO BASEBALL HEIST IQ MID 11GM158052 320500.5200 ROYAL/WHT DS BRAND NEWAsics Onitsuka Tiger Corsair White Island Blue Leather Men Vintage D7N2L-0141 , us7 25 cm Vans vans half cab sneakers from japan (1891Man's/Woman's Spira Scorpius II Running Men's Shoes Outstanding features Brand Diversified new design , Caterpillar P89981 Manifold Wp Tough St Mens Oak - Mens Oak - 9.5 Wide , Santoni Brown Leather Mens Boots Size 10 () , New Merrell Barkley Moc Mens Comfortable Slip On Leather Casual ShoesStacy Adams Teager Mens Oxford Black Size 11.5M , Twinkle Toes by Skechers Golf Women's Go Pro ShoeSaucony Triumph ISO 2 Women's Blue/Pink S102902Elegant Round Toe Chunky High Heels Leather Pull On Women's Ankle Boots Ths01Mr/Ms MINNETONKA Shoes 692444 Brown 7 High security Elegant style Complete specificationsAriat Womens Fatbaby II Western Cowboy Boot Black Embroidered Orchid Leather 6 , Women's FRYE Jane Tall Cuff Boots Beige Taupe High Heel Buckle Distressed 9 1/2 , Qupid Women's Norah-01x Slouch Boot, Taupe, 8.5 M US ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    New Balance Size 574 Beige Sneakers Women's 29987 US Sample Size 7 7 (E1,7) 5237cce
    Athletic Shoes