Never miss an update

Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Abilene
Color: Tan Style: Riding Boots
Material: Leather MPN: 9195
Never miss an update

Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf - blurrypron.com

    Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf
    Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf
    Muck Boot's Womens Reign Tall Boot Black/Hot Pink - Size 9 , Muck Boots Black Women's Cambridge Tall Boot w/ XpressCool Lining - Size 5Muck Boots Pink Realtree Women's Arctic Hunter Mid Boot - Size 11Leather Floral Stitch Boot, Size 8.5, Cowboy boot, Leather boots, Floral Pattern , Muck Boots Black Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining - Size 6 , Muck Boot's Womens Tremont Tall Boots - Size 7 , Muck Boots Black Women's Cambridge Tall Boot w/ XpressCool Lining - Size 7 , Muck Boots Black Women's Cambridge Tall Boot w/ XpressCool Lining - Size 10Muck Boots Navy/White Stripe Women's Cambridge Tall Boot - Size 10Muck Boots Mossy Oak Women's Arctic Hunter Mid Boot w/ Fleece Lining - Size 11 , Muck Boot's Womens Reign Tall Boot Black/Hot Pink - Size 11Muck Boots Black Meadows Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining- Size 5 , Muck Boots Black Meadows Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining- Size 6Muck Boots Black Meadows Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining- Size 7Muck Boots Navy/White Stripe Women's Cambridge Tall Boot - Size 6 , Muck Boots Mossy Oak Women's Arctic Hunter Mid Boot w/ Fleece Lining - Size 9 , Muck Boots Navy/Red Anchors Women's Cambridge Tall Boot - Size 11 , Muck Boots Navy/Red Anchors Women's Cambridge Tall Boot - Size 5 , Muck Boots Gray/Coral Stripe Women's Cambridge Tall Boot - Size 5 , Muck Boots Bark/Brass Women's Tremont Supreme Boot - Size 10Muck Boots Gray/Coral Stripe Women's Cambridge Tall Boot - Size 11Muck BootWomens Reign Black/Purple - Womens Size 6 , Muck Boots Forest Green Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining- Size 6 , Muck Boots Forest Green Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining- Size 5Muck Boot's Womens Tremont Tall Boot - Size 11 , Muck Boots Navy Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining - Size 6 , Muck Boots Black Women's Cambridge Tall Boot w/ XpressCool Lining - Size 6 , Muck Boots Black Women's Tremont Tall Boot w/ Warm Fleece Lining - Size 5Muck Boot's Womens Tremont Supreme Boots - Size 5 ,
    Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf - blurrypron.com>Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf - blurrypron.com
    IRO Booties Suede 40US NIFTY Moccasin Flat Studs Brown Ankle Shoes NIBIDF Scout Commando canvas TAN Boots Made in IsraelMan's/Woman's Ladies Rieker Shoes Style - 43790 Crazy price, Birmingham Fast delivery Very practicalBees By Beacon Womens POLLY JERSEY Square Toe Ballet Flats Black Size 7.5 , Womens Bare Traps Simply Black Flats 6.5 M , Man's/Woman's Ecco Mary Janes-Women's size 9-9.5 Grey Special price First grade in its class leading the fashionElegantPark HP1705 Women High Heel Shoes Open Toe Cross Strap Satin Wedding US 8 , Puma Enzo Strap Knit Wns Black White Women Running Shoes Sneakers 19003-202NIKE ROSHE RUN NM W SP WORLD CUP Pack BRAZIL SZ 10 Max 90 RonaldoVans Mens Fairhaven SF Waxed Sneakers Dark Navy Gum Size 6.5 NewNike Air Max Flair Mens Black Turquoise Running Training Sneaker 942236 010 NIBNike Mens Air Max Premium Safari Desert Camo 512033-203 Sz 9PUMA Men's Podio SF Fashion Sneaker Black Black 10 M US , NIKE KYRIE 4 MEN'S BASKETBALL SHOES SIZE: 10.5 UNCLE DREW DEEP ROYAL 943806 100 , Nike Air Max 95 PRM Premium Praline/Turbo Green-Cool Grey Mens Sz 10 538416 204 , Asics H503K-1635 Gel-Lyte III Men US Gray Running Shoe- Choose SZ/Color. , Laredo Men's Luke Western Cowboy Leather Boots Tan 68439Red Wing Safety Toe Oxford 6703 Mens 11.5 BlackRanger Steel Midsole Rubber Boots SIZE 8NIB FRYE Men's John Addison Back Zip Harness Boot Chestnut 9 M Made In USA $500New Balance Men's Md597v1 Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , To Boot New York James Men's Brown Alek Leather Dress Penny Loafers, Size 8.5 , FOOTJOY Classics Men Spike-less Wing-Tip Golf Shoes Size 9B Black LeatherWmns Nike Rivah Desert Sand Grey White Women Slip On Running Shoes AH6774-005adidas Women's Adizero Ubersonic 3 w Tennis Shoe - Choose SZ/ColorTom Ford Burgundy Flat High Top Walking Sneakers Shoes $970 38.5 , Mr/Ms Hogan Womens Sneaker Pink HXW2220Q69077YP223P Outstanding features Beautiful Very good classification , Womens Pu leather Knee High Boots Casual Wedge Hidden Casual Stretchy Shoes , Women's Riding Combat Retro Pull On High Chuncky Block Heel SHoes Suede Plus , Bearpaw Britney Women's Brown Suede Wedge Winter Boots sz. 9
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Abilene Boot Women's Equestrian Wellington 12614 Boot - bagisrecor-12617 Square Toe - 9195 e73c5cf
    Boots
    >
    ;