Never miss an update

New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Size: 12 M US
MPN: WL520CG-036-12 B US Department: womens
Model: WL520CG-036-12 B US Color: Overcast/Nimbus Cloud
Brand: New Balance US Shoe Size (Women's): Does not apply
UPC: 798248223908 EAN: 0798248223908
Never miss an update

New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e - blurrypron.com

    New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e
    New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e
    Keds Women's Kickstart Striped Mesh Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Nike Womens Air Relentless 6 Running Trainers 843882 Sneakers Shoes 009Under Armour Women's Mid Short - Choose SZ/Color , Skechers Sport Women's Just Relax Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Gentleman/Lady Skechers Women's Double up-Duvet Sneaker use Comfortable touch Acknowledgement feedback , Man/Woman Lauren Ralph Lauren Women's Janis Sneaker elegant Cheaper than the price Good qualityadidas Women's Pw Tennis Hu W - Choose SZ/Color , Marc Fisher Women's Dexie Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Nike Womens Son Of Force Mid Trainers 616303 Sneakers Shoes 991 , Skechers BOBS Women's Beach Bingo-Dog House Party SneakerReebok Sublite Duo Smooth Womens Running Shoe , AVIA Men's Avi-Union Strap Service Shoe White/Chrome Silver 8 XW USKeds Women's Studio LIV Diamond Mesh Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorWOMEN'S SIZE 9.5 NIKE SNEAKERS ZOOM TR CROSS TRAINER SHOE 917712 400 NIBKeds Women's Driftkick Heathered Mesh Sneaker - Choose SZ/Colornike womens roshe LD-1000 QS running trainers 810382 401 sneakers shoes , K-Swiss Women's Gstaad Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Skechers Women's Flex Appeal 2.0 Sneaker White/Grey 8 M USSkechers Performance Women's Go Step Lite-14730 Walking ShoeCharcoal7.5 M USSaucony Originals Women's Freedom Runner Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , Skechers Women's Go Walk Lite-15402 Ballet FlatReebok BS8000 Womens Trainfusion Nine 2.0 Track Shoe, Alloy/Flint Grey/ViciousSkechers Sport Women's Ultra Flex Sneaker,Black/Black,7.5 M USWomen's Fashion Sneakers Athletic Sports Walking Shoes Casual Platform Chunky , Skechers Women's You Define Sneaker Black 8 M USSuperga Men's 2750 Cotu Classic - Choose SZ/Color , Man's/Woman's NEW SCIUSCERT WOMENS SNEAKERS Long-term reputation First batch of customers General productPUMA Women's Platform Strap Satin En Pointe Wn Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Teva Women's Freewheel Suede Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color ,
    New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e - blurrypron.com>New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e - blurrypron.com
    BRAND NEW $388 FRYE MELISSA BUTTON BACK ZIP RIDING BOOTS DARK BROWN - 8.5 BDolce & Gabbana Black rubber boots w fur trim shaft cap toe 35.5Stuart Weitzman Highland Over the Knee Buff Tan Suede Boots Size 11.5 MVintage Leddy Vaguera Black Patent Leather Cowgirl Boots Hot One of the Kind , adidas stan smith white Womens Shoes Size: US 9, , Nike Star Runner JDI GS Just Do It Black Silver Red Kid Women Shoes AQ9954-002 , New Naturalizer Natalie Womens Comfortable Leather Mid Heel PumpsKenneth Cole New York W/ Silver Technology New Cork Wedges Womens Size 7 MLauren Lorraine Eva Rhinestone Peep Toe Slim Heel Silver Glitter Bootie , Jessica Simpson Remixx 11 Black Suede Round Wedge Ankle Boot Bootie Zip ClosureGIORGIO'S of PALM BEACH Black Ostrich Skin Pumps w/Leather Bows 8B (38.5) , Plomo Gray Leather Open Toe Wedge Sandals Womens Size 39 MNEW STUART WEITZMAN SHOES SIZE 7 PATENT LEATHER OVALTEE STRAP BEIGE PASTRY NAPLAJimmy Choo Lydia Light Gold Sand Shimmer Suede Authentic D'Orsay Pumps New 37.5 , S-994150 New Prada Ballerina Rubber Black Platform Shoes Size US-9.5 Marked 39.5JSport by Jambu Woodland Criss Cross Sports Sandals, Black, 7.5 US / 38 EUDR. SCHOLL WOMEN'S FLIP FLOPS WITH WEDGE HEEL GLAM SS 2 GOLD , NEW BALANCE NITREL TRAIL MENS RUNNING MTNTR , NIKE HYPERVENOM PHELON 2 IC Indoor Soccer Bronze 749898-903 Men's Size 12 , Adidas Originals Swift Run [CQ2109] Men Casual Shoes Grey/GreyNike Air Max 2 Uptempo 94 White/Black Blue 922934-102 SZ 10.5 11.5 13 Basketball , Nike Air Jordan retro 10 lady liberty ten all star bnib DS size 1212 MEN'S Nike Air Jordan 9 Retro Statue 302370 109 White Black Green Sneakers , Frye Men's Engineer Boots, Dark Brown, Size  10 M US   Made in USA , men's shoes CAMOUFLAGE 10 () desert boots blue suede as956 , Skechers for Work Men's Hartan Steel Toe Shoe 77066/DKBR Dark Brown Size 9Men's Shoes Kenneth Cole Reach Ur Goal Suede Drivers KMS6NU013 Laguna *New* , Skechers Sport Men's Equalizer Persistent Slip-On Sneaker, Charcoal, 8 M USInvicta Men's 'Subaqua' Quartz Stainless Steel and Silicone Casual Watch,...Man's/Woman's Martin boots wholesale Let our goods go to the world Modern mode ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    New Balance Women's 520v1 29988 Sneaker Overcast Balance Cloud/Nimbus Cloud 12 B US 7b50c4e
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;