Never miss an update

Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Authenticity: 100% Authentic Guaranteed
Colour: Grey SizeScale: Us Size
Material: Leather Shoe Type: Sneakers
MPN: Cm9571 Style: Fashion Sneakers
Width: Medium Brand: Reebok
Never miss an update

Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1 - blurrypron.com

    Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1
    Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1
    MENS SALMING XPLORE X2.0 MEN'S TRAINING/RUNNERS/SNEAKERS/FITNESS/RUNNING SHOES , Adidas Alphabounce Beyond M Cushioning Running Shoes White/Legend Ink AQ0575Lonsdale Balham Trainers Mens Shoes Sneakers Footwear , Mizuno Synchro MX 2 Black Silver White Men Running Shoes Sneakers J1GE17-1961 , New Balance NB MSRMCBW D Cypher Run Lightweight Running Shoes 2017 Black/WhiteVersace 19.69 V5390 CAMOSCIO TESTAMORO sneaker Men's Brown AULacoste Gazon 118 Caw Leather Shoes Shoes Summer Shoes Trainers Size Selectable , Puma R698 YOTM Year Of The Monkey Mens Running Shoes Sneakers Trainers 362093-02Under Armour UA Charged Rebel Breathable Running Shoes Black/White 1298553-001Diesel D String Low Estate Blue Shoes Shoes Low Top Trainers Size Selectable , Diesel Hyghrunn S Leather Trainers Shoe Shoes Size 43 NewFred Perry Linden Mens Almond Suede TrainersReebok Zoku Runner ULTK Gum UltraKnit Black Men Running Shoes Sneakers BD5481Nike SB Check Solar Skate Shoes Mens Black/White Casual Trainers SneakersConverse BO-158964C_MOREL_BUNGEE_CORD_WHITE_DUST sneaker Men's - colour Grey AU , Reebok Speed TR Flexweave Black White Men Cross Training Shoes Sneakers CN5500Versace 19.69 V509 TOKYO GRIGIO CAM GRIGIO sneaker Men's Grey AUadidas Tubular Doom Shoes White Men BA7554New Balance NB MCOASAP2 D 2016 Lightweight Lifestyle Running Shoes White/Black , Mens Reebok Z quick Light Running Trainer - V60323 - Yellow Trainers , Adidas SWIFT RUN CG4110 Black mod. CG4110New Balance NB MCOASHB3 2E 2017 Lightweight Lifestyle Running Shoes Black/White , Reebok Fusium Run Lightweight Training Running Shoes Black/Coal/White CN2431Bayliss Lacoste Shoes Fashion Red Men New , Jamyson Steve Madden Shoes Leather Brown Men New[bargain] Asics Piranha SP 5 Mens Running Shoe (D) (0793) | NEW! , NIKE DOWNSHIFTER 6 WHITE BLUE MENS RUNNING SHOES US 14 ** FREE POST AUSTRALIAMizuno Sport Style Synchro MX 2 Black Grey Men Running Shoes Sneaker J1GE17-1949Merrell 1Six8 Mesh Blue Grey Men Outdoors Casual Shoes Sneakers Trainers ML91353
    Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1 - blurrypron.com>Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1 - blurrypron.com
    Gameday Auburn University Cowgirl Boot - Pointed Toe - AUB L001-1Genuine Leather 20cm Extreme Raisin Fetish Peep Toe Mule Platform SandalsNew Django & Juliette Wasat Black Womens Shoes Dress Sandals Heeled , Sanita Danish Clogs Professional Gwenore Brown Women Shoes Sz 9-9.5 AL4327 , NIB VINCE CAMUTO Haircalf Smoking Loafer Flats 7.5, 8 or 8.5 , AGL Black Leather Casual Horsebit Cap Toe Ballet Flat Shoes Women's Size 39 / 9Sexy Women Low Heels Faux Leather Pointy Toe Work OL Shoes Dress Pumps Plus Size , Gothic Women Madoka Kaname Cosplay High Heels Lolita Cross Strap Shoes round toePleaser ADORE-708VLRS Women's Exotic Gold Rhinestone Platform Heel Strap Sandals , Man's/Woman's Guess Padton4 Heeled Sandals, Pink Multi use Has a long reputation best sellerNew J Crew Women’s Martina Suede Wedges Black $228 Sz 6 , Women's Size 10B Dark Saddle Karla Suede Ralph Lauren High Heels Pumps Shoes. , Propét Womens breexe Open Toe Casual Sport Sandals , Man's/Woman's NEW BALANCE ML574ESE BLACK Elegant appearance Fast delivery SimpleMountain Dew x Supra Amigo - "Mountain Boo" Mens Size 9Converse Star Player Ox Mens Khaki Black Suede Trainers , Man/Woman Nike Hyperflight Mens 9 (Silver) Crazy price, Birmingham Elegant style Rich on-time deliveryUNDERCOVER UNDERCOVERISM JUN TAKAHASHI 16F06-1 JAGGED SNEAKERS WHITE SIZE 10 US , Men's/Women's GENUINE ITALIAN LEATHER SHOE SIZE 101/2M Many varieties stable quality Non-slipNike Blazer Mid LTR PRM Size 8 RARE WOMENS BURGUNDY SNAKESKINHUGO BOSS Brown Leather Cap-toe Men's Oxford 10 43 Dress Formal Fashion Casual , NEW Skechers OG 85 Street Sneak Low 113-WHT Womens Shoes Trainers Sneakers SALEWMNS NIKE HYPERVENOM PHANTOM II 2 FG ID BLACK-WHITE SZ 7.5 [812221-903] , Nike Air Force 1 Upstep SE Womens 844877-600 Atomic Pink Orange Shoes Size 9.5 , Korean Retro Hottest Womens Mens Leather Speed Flat Trainer Shoes Sneakers 2019 , New $720 Women's Laurence Dacade Checked Hi-top Navy & White Sneakers Sz 38.5Nike Women's Epic React Flyknit 2018 Rust Pink Tint Tropical Running AQ0070-602 , Billabong Womens Jaftmmon DesertBrown Ankle Boots Size 7 (343819) , Gentleman/Lady XOXO Marcher Knee-High Boots, Black Complete specification a wide range of products Known for its beautiful quality , Jeffrey Campbell Vedette Point Toe Booties in White Size: 8.5
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Reebok Club C Sneakers 85 Shoes RT Coal White Reebok Moss Men Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers CM9571 59f43e1
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;