Never miss an update

Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Puma
Material: Leather;Satin Style: Lifestyle
Occasion: Casual MPN: 365776-02
US Shoe Size (Women's): 9.5 B Width: Medium (B, M)
Closure: Zipper Color: Pink
Shaft Height: Mid-Top UPC: 190276353112
Never miss an update

Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d - blurrypron.com

    Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d
    Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d
    Corral Women's Western Square Leather Toe Boots Sand Engraved Feathers C3276 , Stuart Weitzman New 5050 Black Womens Shoes Size 4 M Boots MSRP $655Vera Wang Black Leather Silver Stud Sequin "Beacon" Ankle Booties SZ 8Rare Vintage Burberry Padded Leather Buckle Pointed Toe Knee Boots US7 EU37 UK5 , Via Spiga Fortuna Leather Bootie Black Women Sz 7.5 M 4246 *NEW!! rag & bone Motorcycle Boot- Black- Size 7.5 US/ 37.5 $798 (B60) , FRYE Jenna antiqued brown leather studded tall moto boots size 7 , Women's NEW White's Boots Leather size 7 D 7D hand made in USA , Los Altos Ladies 3X Toe Ostrich Print Pull Up Cowboy Western BootsDehner Basic Dress Equestrian Riding Patrol Black Calfskin Custom Boots WomensAquatalia by Marvin K Deliver Black Leather Tall Riding Boots Size 7 $598 , New Giuseppe Zanotti $1,150 Fringe Suede Black Western Leather Boot (Size: 38EU)Pure Python $900 GIANNI BRAVO Glossy Black All Python Boot Made in Italy SZ36Lady Couture Women's Fantastic Rhinestone Zip Up Knee High Boots Red Size , Paul Green Round Toe Zipper Ankle Leather Bootie Black Women Sz 6 * , New FRYE Women's Diana Cut Tall Stud Brown Distressed Leather Boots Sz 9.5Blondo Fantasia Waterproof Black Leather Shearling Lining Ankle Boots 8 MB.MAKOVSKY LEATHER BOOTIE US 8 NEW HOT , Corral Women's Western Sand Laser Studs US Flag Boots C3222Stuart Weitzman Mitten Suede Back-tie Slasue Suede Boots Size: US 10.5 Regular M , Vince Pull On Leather Boots Black Women Sz 6.5 M 5870 *YVES SAINT LAURENT BLACK SUEDE KNEE HIGH PLATFORM BOOTS SZ 38.5 8.5NEW M MISSONI PURPLE AND BLACK SIDE ZIPPER SHORT BOOTS BOOTIES Shoes 40TORY BURCH WOMEN'S MILAN WEDGE ANKLE ZIP UP LEATHER BOOTIE BLACK 10.5 EUC! $395 , Women's FRYE MELISSA 228628 black leather tall military boots sz. 5.5 B , Nando Muzi 601 Black Stretch UltraSuede / Leather Knee-High Boots 36.5 / US 6.5 , Liberty Black Brianna Shorty Boot~ Deep Navy , Aquatalia Women's black leather pull on booties sz. 5.5 , Laura Bellariva 7028 Black / Gray Leather / Stretch Zip Boots 38 / US 8 ,
    Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d - blurrypron.com>Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d - blurrypron.com
    Aquatalia Women's Lenore Suede/Shearling, Dark Brown, 8 M M US , Nike Air Vapormax Black Sepia Stone Green Men Running Shoes Sneakers AH9046-005 , New Beltrami Howler Womens Shoes Casual Shoes FlatDjango and Juliette Caviar in Black, MistyWomen's Cole Haan Gramercy Cap Toe Oxfords Shoes Size 10.5 FERN-IVORY NIB $198BIRKENSTOCK Super Birki Blue Birko-Flor Professional Clogs Women’s Size 38 M , Nine West Camelle Ankle Strap Pumps, Tan Multi, 8.5 US , Fringe New Ankle Strappy Pointy Toe Slim Stiletto Heel Shoes Slip On Leather Sz , Stuart Weitzman Reversal Gold Supple Kid Leather Strappy Heels Sandals 8 N 2A , Neon Glow Platform Stiletto Dual Strap Slide Mules High Heels Shoes Adult WomenPrada Tan Shiny Print Peep Toe Stilettos Size 10Limited! Roger Vivier Gold Leaf Buckle Satin Flats 35.5, Excellent Condition!FitFlop Womens Slinky Rokkit Toe-Post Sandal, Black, 7 M USED Ellen DeGeneres Women's Langston Love Ballet Flat Floral Ikat CottonWOMENS NIKE RIFT WRAP 853541-100 WHITE DS SIZE: 9 , Nike Men's Stefan Janoski Max Sneakers Size 7 to 13 us 631303 010Air Jordan 11 Retro Low - White Cobalt Zen Grey SZ 12 (306008 142) , Nike Air Jordan Trainer 1 Low Mens Basketball Trainers 845403 002 Sneakers ShoesShoes Lotto Life's Trophy T7148 Man Sneakers White Leather Sport Casual Logo Gym , Nike Hyperdunk "Tony Parker" PE EA Games Live 2009 Spurs Sz 10 , Kith x Nike Air Maestro II 2 High Red Black Take Flight Size 11.5 BRAND NEW , Puma Men Training Shoes Sequence Clematis Blue Peacoat Silver MeshTrask Derek Loafer - Men's Size 9.5 M, Saddle Tan , Men Patent Leather Round Toe Brogue Slip Formal Casual Shoes Oxford Size , Skechers Women's Flex Appeal2.0-Newsmaker Sneaker, Black, Size 10.0 , Women Sneaker Reebok BS7029 Pump Isar Training shoesNike Dunk Low Newsprint/Dark Army-Gum Light Brown 308608-032 Women's SZ 11Brooks Transcend 3 Running Women's Shoes Size 13 , Womens Platform Suede Pull On Stiletto Heels Office Ankle Boots Casual ShoesSquare Toe Patent Leather Zip Mid Chunky Block Heels Womens Mid Calf Boots Shoes
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Puma x Fenty by Rihanna Strapped Sneaker Sneaker - Boot 29544 Pink - Womens - Size 9.5 B 86e299d
    Boots
    >
    ;