Never miss an update

Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 695640066006
Weight: 3.6 lbs EAN: 0695640066006
Dimensions: L 17 x W 12 x H 4.2 inches Brand: Antelope
NumberOfItems: 1 MPN: Mid-calf Boot 475
PartNumber: 847520067362 Binding: Apparel
ProductGroup: Shoes ClothingSize: 40 EU/10 M US
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: Black Brush
Style: Not Applicable Department: womens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 40 M EU / 10 B(M) US
Never miss an update

Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d -

    Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d
    Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d
    Delight-2049, 5 3/4'' Platform Knee Boot Black/Black Size 7 , Man's/Woman's Le Mans (838-8657) Bootie Quality products Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad British temperamentNEW CLARKS WOMENS UN ADORN MID - WOMENS BOOTS - TAUPE NUBUCK , Pleaser Women's Adore-2043 Boot,Black Patent,11 M USTeva Women's Delavina Ankle Bootie, Tan, 7.5 M USFLY London Women's Duke941fly Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/ColorChurch's Women's White Suede Ankle Desert Boots IT35/US5~RTL$725Boc By Born Concepts Rhonda Brown Leather Western Cowboy Boot Women (9.5, Brown) , Man's/Woman's Dansko Women's Shirley Boot Special purchase Settlement Price Valuable boutiqueALDO Women's Wiema Black Suede 39 B EU , Laredo Women's Bridget Western Boot, Tan, 8.5 M USAriat Women's Delilah Work Boot, Toasted Brown, 8.5 B US , Pleaser Women's Dagger-2020 Knee-High Boot,Red Patent,6 M US , Vionic Womens Sterling Bootie Saddle Boot, Size 8.5 WIcebug Women's Glava BUGweb Removable Traction Winter Boot, Earth, 41 EU/9.5 MTeva Women's Delavina Suede Boot Black 8 M USPleaser Women's Dagger-3060 Boot,Black Patent,10 M USBlondo Women's Miora Bootie,Black Nativo,7 M US , Trotters Women's Latch Boot, Dark Grey Suede, 6.5 W US , Helens Heart LB-0290-12 in Red size 6M , Lauren Ralph Lauren Women's Shira Boot Dark Snuff Oily Nubuck 5BWolverine Women's Floorhand Waterproof 10" Steel Toe Work BootCharles By Charles David Women's Eddie Boot, Black, 7.5 M US , Pleaser Women's Crypto-302 Knee-High Boot,Black Polyurethane,9 M US , Kenneth Cole REACTION Women's Rotini Boot, Putty, 6.5 M US , BareTraps Women's Bt Grazi Snow Boot, Taupe, 8.5 M USHELENS HEART 0290-12 GOLD WOMENS WESTERN BOOT Size 6M , INC International Concepts Piano Women's Booties Shoes (9, Black)Chaco Women's Barbary-W Hiking Boot, Nickel Gray, 7.5 M US ,
    Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d ->Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d -
    Sam Edelman Women's Jacob Riding Boot Espresso Bean 8 B(M) US , New Mollini Malbi Womens Shoes Dress Sandals HeeledMBT Women’s Black Peep-Toe Slip-On Flats Shoes Size US 11-11.5 KiangaSkechers BOBS Women's B-Loved - Speed Read Flat, - Choose SZ/Color , Aldo ISAACA Womens Black Leather Combat Boots rrp LG05 97 SALEwBOBS from Skechers Women's Lotopia Pleasantville Flat - Choose SZ/Color , JENN ARDOR Penny Loafers For Women: Vegan Leather Slip-On Comfortable... , Women's Sexy Platform Wedge High Heels Pump Open Toe Sandal Shoes Plus SizeAzzedine Alaia Black Suede BOMBE Flat Ankle Sandals Studded Pumps 36.5 Shoes , Alice & Olivia Giovanna Star Cutout Booties Heels Stiletto Pale Gold Size 37.5/7Womens Roman Flowers Platform Pumps Cross Strap Buckle Cow Leather Sandals Shoes , Sam Edelman Clay Black Leather & Striped Calf Hair High Wedge Sandals Sz 7.5M , PRADA Vernice Black Patent Leather Sandals 38.5 NIB 8.5 Saffiano $790 ShoesNew Max Studio Womens Sxishi Kid Suede Black Sandals With Bow 5.5 MediumSkechers 31721 Womens Beverlee-2ND Chance-Rhinestone H-Band Slide Wedge Sandalnike hyperfeel cross elite womens running trainers 638348 400 sneakers CLEARANCE , NIKE AIR RAID OG 1993 CHOCOLATE/BLACK/BLACK "RARE" SIZE 10 US 9 EUR NEW DS , Reebok Workout Plus Mu Unisex White Orange Leather & Synthetic Trainers , Men's SNKR Project Rodeo 2.0 Casual Shoes Black/White SNKR1809 001adidas NMD R1 Glitch Camo White Black BY1911 - Size US 9.5 -Deadstock ConsortiumGentleman/Lady Air Jordan 5 Retro International Flight Excellent craft Beautiful appearance leading the fashionFashion Mens Casual Round Toe Slip On Loafers Vintage Weaved British Dress Shoes , Neil M Wynne Oxford Black Leather Shoes Men's Size 12 B Made in USA , Bichone Frise On Pink Print Running Shoes For Women- Free Shipping , Zumba Air Classic Remix Shoes - Blackl A1F00087 , 361 Women's 6.5 M 361-Bio-Speed Cross-Trainer Shoe Black/VioletNike Air Max 90 Premium Wolf Gray Sil Gum Sole 443817-011 Women SZ US 10NEW BALANCE W530KIB WOMEN'S CLASSICS SHOES SIZE 9.5Cobb Hill Women's Abilene Boot Bordeaux Size 7.5 FvjTplus US12.5 womens rabbit fur high heel suede ankle boots runway shoes winter ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Antelope 475 mogochinese-25751 Women's Mid Calf 475 Snow Boot, US Black Brush, 40 EU/10 M US f39040d