Never miss an update

Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 886128941841
Weight: 3.55 lbs EAN: 0886128941841
Dimensions: L 13.7 x W 13.31 x H 4.61 inches Brand: Kelsi Dagger Brooklyn
PartNumber: PARKWAYGL-454-6 Medium US MPN: PARKWAYGL
ProductGroup: Shoes Binding: Apparel
ISBN: Not Applicable Color: Storm
Style: Not Applicable Department: womens
US Shoe Size (Women's): 6 M US
Never miss an update

Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a -

    Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a
    Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a
    L'Amour Des Pieds Ineeda Silver Wedge Booties Buckles Womens Size 10Naturalizer Women's Sadie Bootie, Brown Weatherproof Leather, 7 MMarc Fisher Studded Leather Ankle Boots Black Piazza Women's Size 6.5 , Justin Ladies Gypsy Jaguar Brown Boots L2900Pleaser Pink Label Women's Div2018/Bpu Boot, Black Faux Leather, 9 M USkensie Women's Tadyn Boot, Black, 10 M USRampage Women's Hansel Zipper and Buckle Knee-High Riding Boot,Brown Sm Brown BM , BEARPAW Women's Emma Tall Mid Calf Boot 38 M EU/7 BM US, Hickory , Dr Martens Wos Boots Tall MILLY US 11 Brown Leather Wedge Heel Zip Buckle 776Demonia Women's Gothika-100 Calf High Boot Black 7 , Cobb Hill Rockport Women's Melissa Boot, Black, 6.5 W USHelly Hansen Women's Veierland 2 Rain Boot, Black/Black/Eggshell, 6 M US , Teva 1017146 Womens W DE LA Vina Dos Chelsea Boot- Choose SZ/Color.crocs Women's Colorlite Mid Boot W Ankle Bootie, Khaki/Espresso, 4 US/4 M US MJCrew $228 Hadley Suede Ankle Boots Sz 8.5 Black Shoes G8118 AVL , Olivia Miller Women's Hester Ankle Boot, Brown, 8 M USPleaser Women's Gothika-209/B/PU Boot,Black Polyurethene,7 M USSTEVEN by Steve Madden Women's Hatton Ankle Bootie, Navy, 9.5 M USRoxy Women's Eloise Suede Fashion Boot, Black, 8 M USCole Haan NEW Women's Size 10B Java Leather Cassidy Transitional Boots NWOB $300 , Natural World Women's Bota Cuello Vuelto Chukka Boot, Gris, 38 EU/7 M USPleaser Women's Flam2000/b/m Boot, Black Str Patent/Black, 8 M US , CLARKS Women's Fernwood Lake, Dark Brown Leather, 7.5 M US , BC Footwear Women's Scale Ankle Boot, Grey, 7.5 M US , Stuart Weitzman Ankle Boots Brown Suede Leather Rear Zip Sz 7M , CLARKS Women's Cheyn Whisk Riding Boot, Dark Brown, 6 M USSexy Women Over-the-Knee Boots Pointed Toe Thin Heels Boots Woman US Size 4-10.5SCARPA Durable Waterproofed Gor-Tex Vibram Hiking Mountain Camp Boots 10 WomensFLY LONDON Wezo Bootie Rio Red Size 39
    Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a ->Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a -
    Cole Haan Black Suede Waterproof Tall Boots Women's Shoes Size 6 M NEW RTL $348 , Ash Butch Austonian Fringe Boots Size 40Dr Martens 3-Hole Lester Porcelain 14380920 Original Doc , NAPA VALLEY FLATS Leather Red & Iridescent Ivory Chevron Stripes 38.5 Italy RAREMan's/Woman's Matte Black Tieks, Size 7 Fashion pattern Stylish and charming Diversified new design , Yosi Samra YS Foldable Flat Pink Samara Snake red Women’s Size 9 nwot , Miu Miu Pump Black Suede Size 41 Round Toe Lacquered HeelWomens Embroider High Top Sneakers Sandals Platform Wedge High Heels shoes new sTaryn by Taryn Rose Soft Gold Satin & Leather Soft Slides Sz 10 $139Reebok Women's Classic Leather Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorMens ADIDAS SPEED TRAINER 2.0 Running Shoes Mens Trainers NEWNike Roshe Two SE 2 Rosherun Blue Black Men Running Shoes Sneakers 859543-400 , Puma Suede Mid X Stuck Black Alife 358866 01 Men's SZ 10.5 , Saucony Mens Dxn Trainer Fashion Sneaker- Pick SZ/Color. , NIKE AIR MAX 1 ID GREY-WHITE SZ 11 [943756-972] , New Balance 990 White Suede and Nylon Shoes Size US 14, Made in USA , Nike Air Max Deluxe Skepta (UK Rapper), Size 10 USA Seller Global , Dr Doc Martens 8287 Hiking Ankle Air Wair UK sz 4 US Men's sz 5 • Women's sz 7 , NEW PATTON Waterproof Suede Combat Boots Tan Side Zip , Men's Shoes Round Toe Special Leather Square Bottom Breathable Mid Help Sbox14 , NEW Puma RBR WSSP Booty Team 305937-01 Mens Shoes Trainers Sneakers SALEDiadora mens italian sneakers shoes in Honey Leather Fabric Size US 10.5 - , Mephisto Edlef Slip On Dark Brown Smooth Leather - size 10 - was $299 , ASICS Running Shoes LADY GEL-KAYANO 24 Wide TJG759 Smoky Dark Blue US8.5(25.5cm) , Altra The Torin Running Women's Shoes Size 6.5 , Nike Metcon 4 Womens 924593-006 Light Pumice Vast Grey Training Shoes Size 5 , adidas Nmd_R1 W Shoes White Women B37645$149 size 7.5 Nine West Kellan Black Tall Heels Knee High Boots Dress shoes NEWNWOB Circus by Sam Edelman Sz 6.5 VIVICA Gray Suede Over the Knee Boots $100Womens Over Knee Thigh Boots Pull On Patent Leather Block Platform Round Toe New
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Kelsi Storm, Dagger 16309 Brooklyn Women's Parkway Ankle jayhmarketing-16325 Boot, Storm, 6 Medium US 7f93c9a