Never miss an update


Item specifics

: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Anne Klein
Heel Type: THICK Style: Open Toe, SLINBACK
Heel Height: High (3 in. to 4.5 in.) US Shoe Size (Women's): 8.5
Material: LEATHER Width: Medium (B, M)
Pattern: TWO TONE Color: BEIGE & BLACK
Fastening: Buckle UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update


    L.K. Bennett Women's Floret Suede Dress Pump, Oxblood, 39 EU/8.5 M USFLY London Women's Yuzi798fly Pump - Choose SZ/Color , Donald Pliner Couture Metallic Leather Shoe Sandal New Chunky Stones $285 NIB , *FALL MUST HAVE!* Salvatore Ferragamo Black Patent Bow Heels Pumps sz 9 Low HeelST. JOHN PALE GREEN SILK SATIN SHOES, RHINESTONE BUCKLES, SLINGBACKS, SIZE 10 , new $495 new MARC JACOBS red/tan slingbacks heels Shoes - RED sole 36.5 - 6.5Christian Louboutin IR Wool Flannel D'Orsay Heels Pumps Shoes $ 750.00 , STUART WEITZMAN Black Patent Leather Canvas Trim Platform Heels Size 8.5M , Rockport Women's Cobb Hill Angelina Dress Pump, - Choose SZ/Color , new MARC JACOBS logo TURNLOCK KEY purple/red WEDGES shoes 7 - gorgeousRobert Clergerie Paris dark green wedges size /2 US 10 , Donald Pliner Couture Camel Leather Shoe New sz 10 Exotic Strapy Sandal $285 NIB , John Fluevog Annette Side-Zip Heel Tasty Vogs Wide Strap US 6.5 Minimal Wear , Aldo Women's Polesia Dress Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorMen's/Women's Prada Bow Front Platform Heels (EU40) Durable service Used in durability Excellent functionKALDA Pink Thelma 110 Shearling Mules Size 37 $602Nine West Women's Nobu Leather Dress Pump - Choose SZ/Colornew $530 MARC JACOBS brown suede slingbacks heels shoes Italy 37.5 US 7.5 , Men's/Women's manolo blahnik 42 Quality queen In short supply a wide variety of goodsCELINE PURPLE VELOUR PATENT LEATHER TRIM DETAIL PUMPS Sz 36.5M MADE IN ITALYNIB MARC BY MARC JACOBS BLACK LEATHER LOW HEEL CLASSIC PUMPS 38new MARC JACOBS black ID logo peep-toe pumps heels shoesnew $595 LOEFFLER RANDALL 'Adelinel' black patent strappy open-toe cage shoes 5 , NEW MARC BY MARC JACOBS BLACK LEATHER LOW HEEL CLASSIC PUMPS 40electric blue PRADA snakeskin strappy wedge platforms high heels SHOES 40.5 10.5NIB MARC BY MARC JACOBS BURGUNDY LEATHER LOW HEEL CLASSIC PUMPS 37.5 , Miu Miu women Shoes Size 41 , Nine West Women's Matteo Patent Dress Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorGentleman/Lady New** Prada Heels US Size 7.5 Durable service Sufficient supply Modern mode
    Nando Muzi 116 Black Leather Shearling Mid-Calf Platform Boots 37 / US 7 , Adidas Original Superstar 2 (Footlocker) Limited EditionNo Name Womens Plato Sneaker Canvas Low Black Size 3 UK , NEW Hush Puppies Maverick Leather Slip On Black , New Django & Juliette Niche Metallic Multi Womens Shoes Casual Shoes HeeledRieker Kinder K2269, Girls Wedge Heels Sandals, Grey Stahl42, 5 EU , women's shoes MOMA 7 () slip on red leather BT147-37 , Sam Edelman Satin Eye Shoes Purple Size 6 NWOT , Womens TROTTERS black leather slip on casual shoes flats sz. 5.5 M MSRPCL by Chinese Laundry Women's Immortal Wedge Pump Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , new ladies Red 6.5"High Stiletto Heel 3"Platform Ankle Strap Sexy Shoes Size 720cm Sexy Womens Nightclub Stilettos Transparent Slip on Sandals Platform ShoesVince Camuto Women Winiveer Dress Sandal Shoes , Womens Via Spiga pink leather strap sandals/ wedges/ shoes sz. 10 MNIB YSL Saint Laurent KITTEN 50 Black STUDS Mary Jane Pointed Pumps Shoes 38Womens Rhinestones Flats Beach Leather Thong Sandals Flop Flops Summer Shoes New , Women's Sandals Mules Slip On Platform High Wedge Heel Rhinestone Slipper ShoesNWOB Nike Jordan Westbrook 0 Light Bone Leather Snakeskn Shoes 768934-02 Sz 10.5 , NEW MEN'S AIR JORDAN I MID 554724-100Nike Air Jordan XXXII 32 Men's 10.5 Basketball Shoes CEO Black AA1253 016 NEW , Adidas ADO Terrex Agravic Day One Consortium Light Onix Grey Boost CQ2052 Gore , Columbia Men's Granite Ridge Mid Waterproof Wide Hiking ShoeReef Sandals Men's Rover Low - Black/White - 11.5 , 9.5 C VTG FLORSHEIM NAILED LEATHER HEELS BLACK KENMOOR WINGTIP OXFORD MENS SHOE$850 FENDI Moster Eye Black White Snakeskin Slip On Skate Sneakers Men SZ 41 NEWHandmade Men Dark Brown Dress Shoe Men Leather Monk Shoe Men Formal Leather Shoe , Moreschi Brown Monk Strap Deer/Calf Leather Size 9.5 M , NIB Asics T799N Women's Gel-Kayano 24 Running ShoeAlfani Jarabina Women US 8 Black Knee High BootSTEVEN by Steve Madden Women's Beti Ankle Bootie - Choose SZ/Color
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.


    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund