Never miss an update

Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Size: 5.5 B(M) US
Brand: Merrell Style: Casual
MPN: J45724-200 US Shoe Size (Women's): 5.5 B(M) US
UPC: 801100622037
Never miss an update

Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b - blurrypron.com

    Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b
    Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b
    Very Volatile Womens Braya Ankle Bootie- Pick SZ/Color. , Cole Haan Women's Elion Boot Chestnut Leather 7 B US , Aquatalia Womens Wanda Winter Boot Espresso Size 7 M USOld West Cowboy Boots Womens Snip Toe Leather Lined 7 B Tan Fry LF1541FRYE Womens Dara Harness Chelsea- Pick SZ/Color. , Old West Cowboy Boots Womens Goodyear Leather Vintage Charcoal LF1587Kamik Women's Rogue 9 Waterproof Winter Boot Black 8 M USECCO Womens XpEd. III GTX Hiking- Pick SZ/Color.PRE-Owned RUDSAK Tarin Leather Wedge Booties 7.5MPleaser Blondie-R-3011 silver stiletto thigh high dual platform boots sizes 5-11 , ECCO Womens Ukiuk Short Snow BootEU/5-- Pick SZ/Color. , Man's/Woman's Pleaser DEL600-23/BPU/M Womens Boot- Choose SZ/Color. New product Win the praise of customers retail price , Demonia Women's Asst100/Bvl Boot Black Vegan Leather 6 M US , Macie Bean Western Boots Womens Floral Dakota Darling Blonde M8037Laredo Runaway 5404 Womens Gaucho Nutty Mule Leather Western BootsCalvin Klein Gladys Womens Equestrian Boot- Choose SZ/Color. , Calvin Klein Womens Pammie Over the Knee Boot- Pick SZ/Color. , Roper Women's American Beauty Western Boot Brown 8 M USARA Womens THELMA Black Gore-Tex Lined Ankle Boots Size 9 W (43492) , Demonia Women's Grip101/Bca Boot Black Canvas 9 M US , crocs AllCast II Luxe Boot Womens Snow Boot- Choose SZ/Color. , Salomon Womens Ellipse 2 Mid Ltr Gtx W Hiking Boot- Pick SZ/Color.DEMONIA 7" Platform Punk Gogo UV Reactive Neon Pink Green Panels Ankle BootsDr. Martens Women's Delphine Red Arcadia Ankle Boot - Choose SZ/ColorNoble Outfitters Womens Muds Cold Front HighWomen's Dingo Boots -Roni Gray Buffalo Leather Bootie DI790Northside Women's Cece Insulated Fashion Boot Dark Brown 8 M USToe Warmers Women Boots Jennifer Black 8 M US✅ US 8/ ZARA LEATHER POINTED HIGH HEEL BOOTS OVER KNEE BOOTS SHOES
    Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b - blurrypron.com>Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b - blurrypron.com
    Man/Woman Dolce Vita Women's Sibil Ankle Bootie New varieties are launched Attractive fashion business , TORY BURCH - WEMBLEY COCONUT GALLEON LEATHER RIDING BOOT SZ 7, RETAIL $495 , The North Face Womens Shellista II Mid - Dachshund Brown & Demitasse Brown - 8 , Nike PG 2 MM EP II Paul George Mamba Mentality Purple Men Basketball AO2985-001new $995 MIU MIU PRADA dark brown leather buckled BIKER BOOTS 35.5 5.5 - HOTNew NIKE WMNS CORTEZ SE PHANTOM / GOLD 902856-013 US W 6 - 8 TAKSE AU , Rohde Women 9250 Low-Top Gold Size 8.5 UKMen's/Women's JULIET-209 White Beautiful design Stylish and charming Outstanding styleParis Hilton Women's Sandals Black Side Zip Fastening Open Toe Block Chunky , NIB Elysess Velvet Floral Print Heels Size 40 US 9 Stacked Leather Heel , NIB LOUBOUTIN TINA CAGE 100 GOLD PATENT LEATHER BLACK SUEDE SANDALS PUMPS 38.5 , Steve Madden Tickle Two-Piece Platform Sandals 290, Black, 7.5 USDansko white leather tennis shoes, sneakers, walking shoes, size 39 / 8.5Nike Zoom Superfly Elite Running Track Spike Black White New SZ 10 [835996-017] , Nike Air Jordan 6 VI Retro Mens Size 11.5 Low Infrared White Black 304401-123876069-601 Men's Nike Air Max Prime SL Team Red/Grey/Sail Sizes 8-12 New In BoxNike Shox Gravity Vast Grey Metallic Gold AQ8553-009 Men's Size 10 , Nike Flylon Train Dynamic Mens Running Trainers 852926 Sneakers Shoes 002Gentleman/Lady Nike NSW Tiempo '94 Size 10 Ideal gift for all occasions Beautiful Fair price , Air Jordan 6 Retro New Maroon OG 2015 Off White VI Red NIB DS 384664-116Nike Blazer Low LTHR White Black Mens Classic Casual Shoes Sneakers AO2788-101 , Fashion Womens Platform Sports Sandals Roman High Wedge Heel Shoes Creepers SizeAthleta Terrex Agravic by Adidas®, Black/Grey Three/Ash Green Sz 10 , Adidas Originals Women Nmd Racer Pk Primeknit W Boost Blue Running Shoes size 9 , Womens Nike Air Force 1 High LX Casual White/White/Black/Total Orange AO5138 100 , Skechers Women's Gratis-Breezy City Sneaker 5.5 BM US PurpleCircus by Sam Edelman Women's Heidi Ankle Bootie Black 6 M US$290 Castaner Brown Suede Wedge Ankle Platform Boots Size 38Jack Rogers Womens Peyton Ankle Bootie, Light Grey, 7.5 M US , Sbicca Women's Sound Boot - Choose SZ/Color ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Merrell Tremblant Women's Tremblant Mid Snow Polar Waterproof Snow Boot, Oak, Merrell 5.5 M US a76ce8b
    Boots
    >
    ;