Never miss an update

Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Paul Green
MPN: 2313002_2 UPC: 9010095192475
EAN: 9010095192475
Never miss an update

Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538 - blurrypron.com

    Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538
    Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538
    Vagabond Womens Zoe Hi-Top Trainers, Black BlackBlack 92, 5 UK , Legero Amato, Womens Low-Top, Black Schwarz, 5 EU , Legero Tanaro, Womens Low-Top, Black Schwarz, 8.5 EU , HGL Womens 5-10 0366 Hi-Top Trainers, Beige Cotton, 4.5 UKPuma Womens Suede Bow Uprising WNs Low-Top Sneakers, Winsome Orchid White, 7.5 , Marc OPolo Womens 70113913501102 Sneaker Trainers, White White 100, 41 41 EU , IGICo Womens 8767200 High Trainers Black Size 8 UK , Vagabond Womens Zoe Trainers, Black BlackBlack, 5 UK , Legero Womens Mira Hi-Top Trainers, Blue Niagara 84, 4 UKVagabond Womens Kasai Trainers, Schwarz Black, 5.5 UK , Vagabond Womens Zoe Hi-Top Trainers, Black Black 92, 5 UKFrau Beatles, Womens Hi-Top Trainers, Black Nero Nero, 4 EU , Paul Green Womens Diamond CutSoftn Quarz Trainers, Grey CutSoftnquarz 42, 5Paul Green Womens Vintage NappaSz SilverCloud Trainers, Multicolour SilverCCult Women CLE102642 High Trainers Black Size 4 UKPuma Womens Suede Bow Uprising WNs Low-Top Sneakers, Winsome Orchid White, 5 Uara Womens Tirol Trainers, Black SchwarzForest 06, 6 UKCandice Cooper Womens Crust Trainers, White Bianco Wei, 4.5 UK , Paul Green Womens MastercCervo M Trainers, Multicolour WhiteSilver 22, 4 UKPikolinos Womens Lagos 901 Hi-Top Trainers, Orange Apricot, 6 UK , Geox Womens D Jaysen A Slip on Trainers, Black C9999, 4 UK , Mjus Womens 721104-0101 Trainers, Green Salvia 6239, 39 39 EU , Legero Womens Amato Trainers, Black Schwarz 00, 5 UK , Gant Womens Linda Slip on Trainers, Black Black G00, 7.5 UKNo Name Women ENHA4304VE Trainers Pink Size 4 UK , ECCO Summer Zone Mahogany Firefly, Womens Trainers, Brown Zonemahogany Firefly0 , Marip Womens 26210-PI Trainers, Turquoise Camoscio Cloud, 7 UK , Josef Seibel Womens Sina 11 Low-Top Sneakers Black Size 3 , Marc OPolo Womens Sneaker Trainers Grey 920, 8 UK
    Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538 - blurrypron.com>Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538 - blurrypron.com
    Versace 19.69 Abbigliamento Sportivo Srl Milano Italia Womens Short Boot B1441 NGIVENCHY Shark-Lock Knee High Leather Riding Black Boots 40 / US 10 , Miz Mooz Patrice Black Leather Ankle Boot , Sam Edelman Nala Flat Sling-Back Sandals, Zebra/Blue Zip LeatherMephisto Women's Black Red Leather Suede Shoes 8.5 Kd1 , Jessica Simpson Women's Calie Pump - Choose SZ/ColorMen's/Women's Black Suede Heels Pumps Size 8 for you to choose real retail priceJimmy Choo Gemma Suede Slingback Pump MSRP: $575.00 Size 39.5 , ADIDAS MEN FREAK CARBON SIZE 9 BLACK FOOTBALL CLEATS ART Q16056 , ASICS FuzeX Rush - Black;White - MensMarc New York Men's Neptune Oxford Sneakers Navy Blue/White Canvas Size 11 D , GUESS Men's Torence Low-Top Canvas Sneakers Dark Grey Size 13 M , NIke Mayfly Mens Running Trainers 310703 003 Sneakers Shoes , Nike Air Force 1 Low Retro AF1 Size 10 White Red Leather 845053-100 Brand New , NIKE PG 2.5 FRENSO GYM RED DARK OBSIDIAN WHITE BQ8452-600 MENSMENS NIKE TENNIS CLASSIC ULTRA FLYKNIT in colors NAVY / BLUE / WHITE SIZE 13 , Crooked Tongues BKK BBQ Adidas Originals Superskate Mid US13 BNIB Yeezy Solebox , CORRAL Men's Blue Jean Embroidery Narrow Square Toe Cowboy Boots A3450Nunn Bush Men's Otis Plain Toe Chelsea Boot Rust Leather , BASS Vintage Faded Tan, Teal & Khaki Patch Canvas Sneakers size 9.5 MConverse Chuck Taylor All Star Seasonal OX Charcoal Womens Trainers , NIB WOMEN STEVE MADDEN SAVIOR WHITE LEATHER STAR SNEAKERS SHOES SZ 6-10 , NEW Christian Audigier Shoes Gold Lo Ox Strap Grey Sneakers Size 8 / , Nike WOMEN'S Air Force 1 FLYKNIT Total Crimson/White SIZE 7 BRAND NEW , Puma Women's Safari Suede Platform Black Shoes 364594 03 Sz6-9 Fast Shipping L , Adidas Samoa + Womens Style : By3528 ICEPNK,ICEPNK,White Womens Size 6.5 , 1801 adidas Originals N-5923 Women's Sneakers Sports Shoes AQ0267 , Womens Suede Stretch Over Knee Boots Stilettos High Heel Shoes Boots Candy ColorGentlemen/Ladies Bogs women boots 7 Diverse new design Year-end sale The first batch of customers' comprehensive specifications , New I.N.C Womens Rannea Black Perforated Suede Wedge Sling Back Booties Sz 8.5
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Paul Green Womens Sz 2, 3. Met. Cachemire Green Trainers, Multicolour Met.Cachemire 2, 3. 2d27538
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;