Never miss an update

2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Athletic Sneakers
US Shoe Size (Men's): 10 Brand: Nike
Model: Air Max 1 UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95 - blurrypron.com

    2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95
    2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95
    DS REEBOK x BODEGA COTTON MOUTH PUMP AXT US10.5 gum cottonmouth BDGA insta furyADIDAS Ultra Boost W x NAKED 'Waves' Acqua PRIMEKNIT Unisex Sneakers NIB BB1141 , Adidas Pharrell Human Race HU Holi NMD Trail Blank Canvas 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11NIKE AIR JORDAN 1 RETRO Royal Blue × Black Men's Sneakers size US 9.5 Y51 , Nike Air Max 90 Premium 'Running Man' 312334-311 size 10 2008 Misha P.A.M.Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 V2 Bred Black Red US 7.5 /3 , Valentino Garavani sneakers shoes man ROCKRUNNER PY2S0952 A63 green camouflage , NIKE AIR MAG 2011 VERSION BACK TO THE FUTURE SIZE 9 US 8 EUNIKE AIR JORDAN V 5 RETRO PREMIO BIN 23 US 8.5 7.5 42 DOERNBECHER DB , 2014 Nike air jordan XI 11 concord low white blackThe 10 : Nike Blazer Mid x Off White Black US10Adidas Human Race NMD Pharrell Pale Nude AC7361 Size 10.5IN hand_MCM x Puma Suede Classic Sneakers Size 42 Cognac brown us9 eu42 uk8Adidas Dame 4 Bape Black Camo AP9975 Dame4NIKE SUEDE CORTEZ Mashroom × White 1998 Model Men's Sneakers size US 8.5 M08Nike Air Jordan 1 Golf 11 White Silver 917717 101 Retro Chicago Off Unc Bred Top , 4186 adidas x bape sk8 SUPER APE SKATE olive/white US9.5NIKE AIR JORDAN XXX 30 QUAI 54 COSMOS Q54 US 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2016 BLACK PARISNike Air Force 1 Supreme High 9 White Red Black Sf Af1 Dunk Air MaxYeezy Boost Wave Runner 700 Size 8 B75571 ORDER CONFIRMED , NIB Nike Air Force 1 Supreme High 9.5 White Red Black Sf Af1 Dunk Air Max , Nike Zoom Kobe II (2) Prelude Grey sz. 10 / 44 - DS BRAND NEWAdidas Yeezy 750 Boost Light Brown Kanye B35309 Sz 10 100% Authentic , OFF WHITE THE 10: NIKE AIR PRESTO AA3830-002 sneaker BLACK US 9 , Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro pinnacle size 9. Banned. Royal. Off-white. bred , DS NIKE 2011 UNRELEASED SAMPLE AIR MAX 90 RED WASHED DENIM CANVAS 9 ATMOS CAMO 1AFEW x ASICS GEL LYTE III " KOI" Sz US11 UK10 H51NK0190 25th Anniversary 2015OFF WHITE 18 SS VULC LOW TOP SNEAKER / WH NO COLOR Sneaker WHITE 43Nike Air Max 1 Day Premium QS Red Sail Grey Volt size 12
    2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95 - blurrypron.com>2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95 - blurrypron.com
    $414 WHISTLES Marisa BOOTS Ankle (Natural hair, Leather) US 8.5 EU9 New NIBMuck Boots Mossy Oak Women's Arctic Hunter Tall Boot w/ Fleece Lining - Size 11 , Dune London Womens Sibyl Over-the-Knee Boot - Grey Suede US Size 6 , NEW Tory Burch Women's Leila Brown Quilted Leather Wedge Ankle Boots Shoes 7.5 , Sperry Top-Sider 7 Seas Sport Shoes, Black/Black, 9 US / 40 EU , Men/Women NIB D&G logo printed flat Fine workmanship New products in 2018 Selling new productsVintage Gianni Versace Women Shoes Black Patent Leather , Pin Up Couture BETTIE-23 Bettie Sexy Dark Brown Faux Leather T-Strap High HeelsBADGLEY MISCHKA SATIN JEWELED PLATFORM HIGH HEELS PEEP TOE SHOES WOMEN'S 10 MCole Haan Womens Peep Toe Brown Alligator SlingBack Classic Pumps Shoes Size 6 , NIB Aminah Abdul Jillil Bow Pump Black Suede Size 6 Ankle Strap d'Orsay HeelLouboutin Volpi Floral-Print Peep Toe Platform Pump 38.5 EU Pink , $1050 New Authentic BOTTEGA VENETA Leather Platform Heel Pump Black 331391 1000 , Nine West Norita Strappy Dress Sandals, Black/Black, 5 US DisplayNike Men's 863115-331 Air Max Audacity 2016 Green Basketball Shoes Size 10.5Converse Chuck Taylor Hi Men's Sneakers Casual Shoes Red 142401fNIKE SB ZOOM - BLAZER MID DECONSTRUCTED - Black/White/Purple AH6416001 msrp85 , NIB Men's New Adidas ADIZERO TEMPO 8 BB4356 Running Shoes SupernovaReebok x Stash Classic Leather Low CL LTHR R12 Ultramarine Blue Grey 13 V54166Dr. Doc Martens Leverton 2 Eye Moc Toe Shoe Grey Mare Hi Suede MSRP $125 NEWSteve Madden Men's Arrowe Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color , Mark Nason by Skechers 68115 Mens Malling Oxford- Choose SZ/Color. , Men fashion pointy toe party formal business buckle strap metal head shoes pumpsSteve Madden 2911 Womens Glade Black Fashion Sneakers 8.5 Medium (B, M)Nike Metcon DSX Flyknit 2 Women Training Shoes College Navy Sneakers 924595-404 , Nike Air Huarache Run Ultra Mushroom/Deadly Pink/Summit White/Black 81100200Adidas Ultra Boost 4.0 Women's Size 8 Ash Pearl Pink Pk Retro BB6309 , Santana Canada Grey Waterproof Leather Side Zip Fur Top Winter Boot Sz 37/7 MINTMen's/Women's Juicy Couture Boots Elegant and sturdy set meal new ExportAerosoles Womens Hole of Fame Mid Calf Boot- Pick SZ/Color. ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    2014 Max CAMO Nike Air SP Max 1 MC SP USA CAMO US10 DS Patta Kaws Atmos Safari a68ab95
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;