Never miss an update

Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f

Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Fly London
Heel Type: Wedge Style: Boots
Material: 100% Leather Heel Height: Low Heel (0.5-1.5 in.)
Exact Colour: Camel
Never miss an update

Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f -

    Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f
    Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f
    Penelope Chilvers Women's Inclement Cropped Tassel Boots - BirchNEW Sz 9UK Men's Dr Martens Pascal Bandana Paisley Docs 8 Eye Boots Rockabilly , SANTONI women shoes Brown leather chelsea boot with classical wingtip brogue , Gentlemen/Ladies Demonia Sinister-203 Platform Boots - Gothic,Goth,Punk,Black,Buckle Modern technology Sales Italy General product , Dr Martens Pascal Virginia Women Leather Matt Cherry Red Ankle Boots Size 3 - 8Laura Vita Angelina 14 Womens Tan Leather & Synthetic Casual Boots Zip , ROBERTO FESTA women shoes Black stretched napa leather ankle boot with zip , Man's/Woman's Hispanitas 76007 GEENA HISPANITAS ANKLE BOOT Reliable quality new At an affordable priceCELINE women shoes Heritage napa leather wrap camel brown ankle boot , Clarks Ladies Leather Knee High Boots With Stretch Calf - Rosalyn Clara , Laura Vita Alizee 118 Womens Blue Multicolour Suede & Fabric Boots - 39 EU , CAR SHOE women shoes Black suede boot with faux fur liningFly london Selk350fly Black Leather Womens Mid Calf Boots , Ladies Clarks Leather Mid Calf Medium Heel Boots - Monica Soul , Man/Woman Short Slim Sole Complete specification range Price reduction negotiationRTBU SHADY Ballet Fetish Hi Heel Mistress Mid Thigh Hi Stocking Boot Wet Look , Gianmarco Lorenzi Shearling Cuffed Black Suede Ankle Boots , AUTHENTIC EYTYS LEATHER HIGH-TOP SNEAKERS BOOTS WHITE GRADE AB USED -AT , Le Chameau Andalou Womens Black Brown Rubber Wellington BootsWomens Ash Valco Faux Fur Trainers BLACK Boots , Harley Davidson Eddington Ladies Black Leather Biker Boots Triple Strap BuckleWomen's Ankle Boots Heels RICHMOND 1638 Velour Nero Patent Leather Black Studs , RTBU CHRIS Stand-Only Over Knee Hard Shaft Customized Fit 18cm Stiletto Boots , Tommy Hilfiger Cozy Warmlined Womens Black Leather & Suede Boots , Women's TX4 Mid GTX Women Taupe/Emerald Size NH05 65 , MAISON MARTIN MARGIELA Suspended-Heel Leather Ankle Boots Size /Robert Clergerie Knee High Stretch Leather Wedge Boots Sz 6.5 B France SOLD OUT! , Salomon Women's Ellipse Winter GTX Snow BootWomen's Shoes Boots CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN Naza Flat Nappa Shearl Spikes Black IT
    Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f ->Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f -
    Men’s Nike Air Max 2017 Running Shoe Sz 7.5 , NEW ARRIVAL-:FINN COMFORT 9- 9 1/2 US Womens (40 EU), 'CUSCO' leather S-18-W-62 , sperry top sider womens Size 9 Leather Boat Shoe Worn Once TanChiara Ferragni Women's Glitter Sabot Silver Cotton Mules , Barbara Bui Shoes Size 38.5 8.5 Beige Wedges Ankle Strap Leather Heels , MANOLO BLAHNIK STRETCHY STRAP HEELS SHOE 38 (sh3000Dr. Martens 1460 8 Eye Boot Black Nappa Women's 11821002Prada Multicolored Snakeskin Leather 37 Heels Shoes 6.5 7 , Pikolinos Brown Leather Slip On Mule Sandals Shoes Size 6 US 36 EUAncient Greek Sandals Galini Metallic Leather Sandal , 94 New Chaco Zong Toe X Slide Sandal Trail Water Beach Casual Women 7 Helix EcliAC691 5 PRO JECT shoes green leather women sandals , Valentino Brown Wedge Platform with Bow - Size 36 , Vans Unisex Authentic Shoe Desert Tribe Blue Graphite, Men SIZE 6.5 Womens 8.0 , PUMA Mens 365 Netfit ST Soccer-Shoes- Pick SZ/Color. , New Nike Men's Air Huarache Ultra SE Shoes (875841-301) Cargo Khaki/Ttl Crimson , British Combat Retro Men Pull On Chelsea Ankle Boots Military Formal US 5.5-10.5Nike Air Jordan Retro 1 Chicago Red & 4 IV Oreo Black Tech Grey 100% NIB DS , Men's/Women's Lugz Men's Empire Hi WR Great variety Year-end sale Export , Ed Hardy Mens Frisian Mid Sneaker Chocolate Brown Suede Size 8 M US , Man/Woman Mens-Size-13-Tan-Casual-Shoes-Boat-Style-Cushioned-Footbed-Vitalize-Ortholite Practical and economical Medium cost Current shapeCole Haan Zerogrand Wing C25292 Barley/TBT Red Casual Oxfords Men's-New Sz 7.5 MRivet Personality Mens Bee Metal Velvet Loafers Slip on Dress Shoes Clubwear Bar , Mens Pointed Metal Leather Buckle Dress Formal Retro Metal Cuban Hees Chic Shoes , Womens Nike Lunarracer SFB LIB QS Size 6 (821781 433) No Box , Reebok Women CM8755 Floatride RS ULTK Running Shoes blue pink Sneakersadidas Originals Swift Run Primeknit Women's Icey Blue/Icey Blue/White CG4137Sam Edelman Petty Womens Shoes Size 8.5 38.5 Black Textured Leather BootiesBebe Real calf hair black white boots heel bootie Italy made US 6.5 WOW sEXY !!Dr. Martens AW004 Brown Suede Double Buckle Mid-Calf Boot Women Size 39 / US 5L ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Fly London Women's Boot Mong Rug London Leather Zip Ankle Boot Camel Camel 699ab4f