Never miss an update

NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Burberry
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.) Style: T-Strap
Material: Leather US Shoe Size (Women's): EU 36.5 / US 6.5
Fastening: Hook & Loop Fasteners Width: Medium (B, M)
Pattern: Solid Color: Brown
Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a - blurrypron.com

    NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a
    NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a
    Stuart Weitzman NearlyNude Ankle Strap Sandal Candy Velvet Size 4.5 M , Tory Burch Patty 80mm Wedge Slide Sandals, Perfect Cuoio, 6M , Ancient Greek Sandals x Peter Pilotto NIB Multicolor Zoe Flat Sandals SZ 37 , Salvatore Ferragamo Monica Taupe Slide Metallic Leather Sandals 6.5 B, 7 N, 8 B , NWT Balenciaga 40C EU/9.5C US Leather Gladiator Turquoise Sandals Orig.575$PRADA LINEA ROSSA Black Leather Platform Wedge Size 36.5$248 LOLA CRUZ Sandal 6 Beaded Crystal White T-Strap Low Heel Sandal *EXCELLENT* , Puma Rihanna Leadcat Fenty White Fur Slides 5.5 RARE , Gentlemen/Ladies CH51060028 logo Flat Sandals (38)(black) Good design Sufficient supply British temperament , BALENCIAGA Black Gray Leather Ankle Buckle Toe Strap Glove Sandals Sz 36 B4066 , Miu Miu NIB Suede Carved Wooden Platform Sandals Navy Blue Brown Size 40 $750miu miu sandals enamel leather pink chain BijouTory Burch Gabrielle Royal Tan Leather Wedge Sandals Size 6 36 $350 NEWNEW PRADA Donna Crisscross Mule Espadrille Wedge Sandal Shoe Black Suede 38.5-8 , NIB Prada Sport Silver Metal Nappa Silk Leather Knotted Sandals New 6.5 36.5Robert Clergerie Nude Pink Beige Fabulous Platform Peeptoe Shoes Sandals 39.5 , NIB Tory Burch Laura Flat Thong Spark Gold Sandals Size 9 , BOTTEGA VENETA Soft WOVEN Intrecciato Leather Slides Sandals 6.5 US/37 EU ITALY , Authentic FENDI Vintage Zucca Pattern Pumps Shoes Brown Canvas G03045AGL Women's Gray Suede Leather Snakeskin Open Toe Sandals 1292 Sz 38 EURJIMMY CHOO LINDA Sandals leather Gold Lizard Embossed , Cydwoq Sandals Tomcat Ankle Straps Size 36 New , Womens TORY BURCH Taupe Leather Wedge Ankle Strap Sandals Sz. 9.5 M , NEW Paul Smith Aquatic Blue Kai Woman's Wedge Sandals Shoe Size 40 41 MSRP $725Colorful BEADED Stuart Weitzman "CUPCAKE" White NAPPA LEATHER Sandals Size 7B/37 , Sergio Rossi Jelly Leather Python T-Strap Sandal Thong Shoes Size 36 US 6NIB Tory Burch Tatiana Slide Sandals Shoes HICKS GARDEN 10 MNIB Tory Burch Miller Logo 60mm Napa Leather Wedge Sandal Shoes Black Size 9Authentic Tory Burch Marguerite Perforated Slingback Sandal Shoes Size 9
    NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a - blurrypron.com>NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a - blurrypron.com
    ECCO Women's Sullivan Buckle Riding Boot Black 40 M Right shoe only 1089 , Allrounder By Mephisto Targa Tex Leather Boot Black Women Sz 7.5 5811 , nike NSW tiempo 94 mid HP QS mens trainers 667544 401 sneakers shoes , PUMA BMW MS DRIFT CAT 6 NM Size:EU:40/US:7,5/UK:6,5/CM25,5 Val: bleufonce , AK Anne Klein Sport Lanette Short Motorcycle Boots, TaupeNew Balance Women's Shoes ML373 NSR Size 5 UK , Womens Sexy Pointed Toe Shallow Mouth Sandals High Heel Stilettos Pull on Shoes , Tory burch divine bow ballet flats driver gold new in box 8.5 , Alexandre Birman Metallic Python Espadrille Flats Mult SzINC Fabulous Ponyskin LEOPARD Platform BOOTIES 7MFly London Kimb Womens Wedge Black Brown White Leather Sandals Size , Man's/Woman's Pierre Hardy Black Patent Leather Pump Elegant appearance buy Various latest designsClassic Womens Ankle Strappy Buckle Pearl Decor Leather Creepers Sandals Shoes , COCLICO SHOES JEWEL WEDGES ANKLE WRAP SANDALS HEELS NEW 39.5 $415 NIB , NEW MANOLO BLAHNIK 'Sista' Patent Leather Thong Sandals in Red (Size 38.5)-$595!ASICS GEL LYTE MT Carbon Gray Blue Trail Running HL7Z1-9797 Mens Size 10 , Vans Sk8-Hi MTE All Weather Scotchguard 3M Dark Earth Seal Brown Mens size 10Mr/Ms Nike Men's Roshe One Running Shoes New Listing low cost King of the crowdNunn Bush Men's Lancaster Classic Suede Leather Chukka Boots - Choose SZ/Color , yeezy boost 350 by1604 from japan (5605 , Georgia Boot Men's G8010 Low-Heel Logger Black Work Boots , NEW Men's Converse Chuck Taylor II Hi-Top Shoes Color: Black/Volt Size: 8 , RARE Givenchy Converse Hi Top Sneakers Sz 41.5 US 8.5 Trainers 9 Riccardo Tisci , Skechers Performance Womens Go Step Lite-Mystic Walking Shoe- Select SZ/Color. , New Balance Womens 7 WLAZRCP Running Sneakers Shoes Sneakers Pink , WMNS Nike Air Max 1 PRM SZ 9 Birch Ivory Gum Light Brown 454746-204 , NEW SCHOLL ORTHAHEEL EXPRESS WOMENS COMFORT SUPPORTIVE ACTIVE CASUAL SHOES , DC Women's Pure High-Top SE Skate ShoeNIKE WOMENS AIR HUARACHE ULTRA PREMIUM BLACK DARK GREY WHITE 859511 001 SZ 7New Hispanitas Womens Soft Leather Boots Made In Spain ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    NIB: (US 8078 Burberry Gladstow Stone Sandal 36.5 (US Size 6.5 6.5 M) 9c2c25a
    Sandals
    >
    ;