Never miss an update

Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 7 US / 5 UK
Occasion: Casual Brand: Trotters
Pattern: Solid MPN: Liz-Brown
Product ID: 090044600946 Style: Loafers & Moccasins
Width: Extra Wide (EEE) Main Colour: Brown
UPC: 090044600946 EAN: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283 - blurrypron.com

    Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283
    Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283
    Athena Alexander Women's toffy Ballet Flat, Tan Suede, Size 10.0 US / 8 UKNATURAL SOUL Women's Viva Loafer Flat, Black, Size 7.0 US / 5 UKMarc Fisher Women's ALIE Mary Jane Flat,, Ivy, Size 8.5 US / 6.5 UK , Mark Lemp Classics Women's Jake Oxford, Black-brown-patent, Size 9.0 US / 7 UKNaturalizer Women's Emiline Slip-on Loafer, Black, Size 7.0 US / 5 UK , Azura by Spring Step Womens Loafers & SlipOns Black 0 US / EU/7.5Walking Cradles Womens fall Closed Toe Loafers, Bone, Size 8.0 US / 6 UK , Aravon Women's Dolly Flat, Stone, Size 8.5 US / 6.5 UK , Mark Lemp Classics Zuzu Womens Ballet Flats Black Softy 10 US / 8 UK , Caterpillar Womens Oxfords Black 8 US / 6 UK , Born Womens Rozalee Closed Toe Ballet Flats , Anne Klein Women's Noris Reptile Slip-On Loafer, MultiColor, Size 6.0 US / 4 UKLucky Brand Women's Carlyn Ballet Flat, Black Multi, Size 9.0 US / 7 UK , Naturalizer Womens Flats Peony Pink 10 US / 8 UK , Clic Women's Flats Low Shoes Pumps Shoes Brown Suede Leather Np 84 NewWalking Cradles Women's Blue Flat, Pewter, Size 6.5 US / 4.5 UK , Vince Camuto Women's Kanta Loafer Flat, Praire Sand, Size 6.5 US / 4.5 UKFranco Sarto Womens Flats Black Patent 7.5 US / 5.5 UKKenneth Cole New York Womens Flats Blush 7 US / 5 UKPropét Womens Cameo Low Top Slip On Fashion Sneakers, Black, Size 6.0 US / 4 UK , NEW ANTICHI ROMANI 843 Women's Sling Sandal Platino , Hush Puppies Womens Loafers & SlipOns Tan Leather 8.5 US / 6.5 UKEastland Women's Tonie Twin Gore Slip On, Brown, Size 7.0 US / 5 UK , Charles David Women's Oracle Penny Loafer, Black, Size 7.5 US / 5.5 UKPropét olivia Womens Fashion Sneakers Taupe 10.5 US / 8.5 UK , Jessica Simpson Womens Flats Totally Taupe 7.5 US / 5.5 UK , Mr/Ms LADIES BLACK CLARKS SHOES "GAEL BOMBAY" Fine processing Has a long reputation Easy life , Ladies Clarks Flats Freckle Ice Black Leather Size 3Clic Women's Flats Size 35 41 42 Court Shoes Shoes Rhinestone Rosa Np 104 New
    Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283 - blurrypron.com>Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283 - blurrypron.com
    Men's/Women's 1970s Pony hair high heeled boots Various styles Pleasant appearance Explosive good goods , Pajar Women's Livia Boot Black Rabbit 38 EU/7-7.5 M US , Women's Born High Flat Boot Martika Black Leather D37303Nike Air Max 90 Mesh GS 833418 Sneakers Shoes 404 , Ankle Biker Boots - TBS Shoes France Leather - MarlieGentleman/Lady LOAFER-04 Black PU White Strong heat and wear resistance Trendy comfortable , A2 by Aerosoles Women's Lavish Slip-On Loafer Navy 5 M US , TORY BURCH Suede Leather Sole Pumps 3" Heel Black Size 10M , Manolo Blahnik High Heeled Brown Suede Open Toe Shoes Size 7 1/2Crocs Tie-on Leather Uppers- Cool Color!- Gently Used Condition- DiscontinuedLanvin Black Leather Ankle Strap Platform Sandal Size 39Cole Haan Leather Sandals Metallic Gold/Bronze/Brown Buckle Womens 9B non-slip , Gibellieri 3291c Black Leather Square Toe Pumps 39 / US 9Osiris NYC 83 Skate Shoes Sneakers Silver Cyan Black size 7 NWB , VANS OLD SKOOL SKATE SHOES MEN'S SIZE 9 women's 10.5 GUM BLANC De BLANC/BlackNike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Perforated Black For Men Size 10.5 555088 002DS Adidas Rose 773 Grey Black Wht 8.5 G56262 9 8 Chicago Bulls 3 adizero 2.5 mvp , NIKE LEBRON SOLDIER XII MEN'S Sneakers AO2609-101 , Nike Air Jordan Formula 23 Low Mens Trainers 919724 Sneakers Shoes 051 , Nike Air Jordan 11 X1 Concord 2011 Mens Size 9 Hightop Basketball Shoe White #Z1 , Justin Men's Stampede 11" Composition Toe Work Boots Right Shoe 9 Left Shoe 10 , Gentleman/Lady miu miu boots Size 10 wholesale a good reputation in the world Elegant and stable packaging , NEW Woolrich Italy Mens Sz 12 M Brown Leather Casual Oxfords Shoes , New Vince Mens Sneakers Chalmers Tennis Shoes Size 8 Flint Suede , Nike Womens Air Max Jewel Running Trainers 896194 Sneakers Shoes 204Nike Womens Air Max + 2012 size 6.5 StyleEasy Spirit Travelport 17 Navy M Suede Womens Clogs Size 8M , Men/Women Tommy Hilfiger Gerdie Boots Women's Boots Good world reputation Elegant style Outstanding functionI35 Fawne Wide Calf Riding Boots 057, Chocolate, 8 US , Chic Women Real Leather Pointed Toe Combat Ankle Boots Chunky Oxfords Punk Shoes
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283 - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Trotters Womens 7.0/ Liz Leather Closed Size Toe Loafers, Brown, Size 7.0 US/ 5 UK e284283
    Flats
    >
    ;