Never miss an update

G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: G by Guess
Fastening: Lace Up Style: Platforms & Wedges
Heel Type: Wedge Width: Medium (B, M)
US Shoe Size (Women's): 10 Material: Synthetic
Occasion: Casual Color: Black
Pattern: Solid UPC: 889915467395
Never miss an update

G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f - blurrypron.com

    G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f
    G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f
    Report Womens Bosen Closed Toe Ballet Flats Pink Size 7.0 uu3JGuess Women's Blasa Dress Sandal Black Size 10.0 H7lUEurosoft - Womens - Cardea Black Size 8.5 aVdn , Call It Spring Womens NYDAREDIA Peep Toe Casual Slingback Beige Size 8.5 zY3vBetsey Johnson Women's Iliana Dress Sandal Black Velvet Size 6.0 , Drew Alana Women's Sandal Pewter/Bronze Size 13.0 fq2QGUESS Women's Parris Heeled Sandal Pink Size 8.0 VQvRFranco Sarto Women's Alora Heeled Sandal Golden Yellow Size 6.0Qupid Womens Interest Fabric Closed Toe Knee High Fashion Boots Taupe Size 6.5Report Womens Bosen Closed Toe Ballet Flats Pink Size 9.5 Qxxw , Skechers Cali Women's Meditation Zen Child Flip-Flop Navy Size 6.0 , DOLCE VITA Black Flat Sandals (SIZE 8) , Onex Women's Alexandria Dress Sandal Tan Size 9.0 7kjtComfortiva Riverton Round Toe Suede Ankle Boot Black Suede Size 6.0Nine West Women's Clowd Synthetic Moccasin Black Size 7.0 , Carlos by Carlos Santana Womens Malor Fabric Peep Toe Special Black Size 9.0ITALIAN Shoemakers Womens Liliana Open Toe Casual Platform Black Size 7.0 VcFRAnnie Shoes Women's Lara Wide Calf Dress Sandal Red Size 8.5 rRbXAnn Marino Womens faustion Closed Toe Casual Mule Sandals Black Size 9.0 , Guess Women's Blasa Dress Sandal Black Size 9.0 Gxem , Dr. Scholl's Womens harlin Closed Toe Casual Mule Sandals Black Size 6.5 Qyki , Onex Women's Dancer Heeled Sandal Black Size 5.0 , Cole Haan Womens Chiannasam Open Toe Casual Brown/Bronze Size 6.0Beacon Womens Cupake Closed Toe Casual Slide Sandals White Size 7.0 cca0Easy Spirit Women's Earthen First Walker Shoe Grey Size 7.5 GpOUBandolino Womens meissa Fabric Open Toe Special Black/Black FB Size 7.5 NUXZ , Report Womens Bosen Closed Toe Ballet Flats Pink Size 8.5 2rtt , Easy Spirit Womens Wiley Open Toe Casual Ankle Black/Black Fabric Size 11.0 u5 , Tahari Womens ta jodi Closed Toe Knee High Fashion Boots Winter Taupe Size 8.5 ,
    G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f - blurrypron.com>G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f - blurrypron.com
    RALPH LAUREN COLLECTION SAHARA SADDLE VACHETTA LEATHER RIDING BOOTS 9.5B ITALY , Men's/Women's Ladies Gabor Shoes 66.094-W Customer first In short supply Maintenance capabilityLa Sportiva TX4 GTX size Eur 37/USA 6 (womens) approach hiking shoe Brand new. , Womens Street Vintage Rivet Metal Flat Sneaker Hip Hop Climbing Boots Chic NewVivienne Westwood Plastic Orb Enamelled Sneakers White/Light Grey Euro 43Sanita Pro Clogs Womens 7.5 US Euro 38 Brown Leather Embossed Textured Excellent , Jimmy Choo Printed Slide Orange Fabric Wedge Sandals , YSL Yves Saint Laurent Tribtoo 105 Cerise Cherry Nappa Pumps Platforms 40 , JBU by Jambu Women's Sugar Encore Platform Sandal, Nude, Size 8.5 , Native Apollo Moc Size 11 Jiffy Black Shell White 21102409-8191Stylish Men Outdoor Sneakers Sports Casual Athletic Running Breathable Shoes 11Nike HypervenomX Proximo IC Indoor Soccer Men's Black/Silver Cleats Sz 11 MPUMA Basket Classic 4th of July Independence Day Stars & Stripes 364778-01 sz 8 , JORDAN ILLUSION LOW SHOES SIZE 10 MICHAEL JORDAN 705146 003 BASKETBALL NEW GYMNIKE CORTEZ BASIC LEATHER OG FORREST GUMP CLASSIC RTRO 882254 164 sz 10.5 New , Air Jordan Retro 1 High OG 332550-012 Black Gym Red Black White Men's Size 11NIKE AIR MAX 1 ULTRA FLYKNIT MEN SIZE 11.0 VOLTAGE GREEN NEW AUTHENTIC LIGHT , Nike Air Jordan VI Retro 6 Black Cat Black-White 2016 3M 384664-020 AUTHENTICMens 8 MERRELL Liberty Ridge Mountaineering Boots Black Leather Italy 1996 NOS , Lugz Men's Empire Lo WR Thermabuck Boot - Choose SZ/ColorDanner Men's Tachyon 8" Black GTX Military and Tactical BootRed Wing Boots / Hiker / Safety Tech Toe / Mens 5 1/2 / Womens 7 1/2 - NEWMan/Woman Born - Mens - Belford Elegant shape At a lower price Excellent functionFila WINSPRINTER 2-W Womens Winsprinter 2 Running Shoe- Choose SZ/Color. , Adidas Swift Run Pk Womens Style : Cg4134 Ice Pink/Ice Pink/Ice Pink Size 7 , Gentleman/Lady Dr. Scholl's Women's Madison Fashion Sneaker Reputation first buy Beautiful and charmingBlack Wome's Round Toe Side Zip Block Heel Metal Decor Ankel Boots Fashion Sz , Fashion Ankle Boots High Stilettos Heels Pointy Toe Side Zip Suede Printed Shoes , Nine West Women's SWEEORN Suede, - Choose SZ/ColorHush Puppies Women's Lindsi Bria Chelsea Boot Dark Brown WP 6 M US ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    G by bagisrecor-11479 Guess Womens Estes Open Open Platform Toe Casual Platform Black Fabric Size 10.0 5dff53f
    Sandals
    >
    ;