Never miss an update

Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Display Shoe. , minor wear on soles. The images shown are of the actual shoes for sale.
Brand: Nina Heel Height: Very High Heel (4 1/2 in or More)
Style: Strappy Heel Type: Slim
Width: Medium (B, M) US Shoe Size (Women's): US 9.5/UK 7.5/EU 40
Material: Leather Pattern: Textured
Color: Gold Shade: Gold
UPC: 716142979813
Never miss an update

Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2 -

    Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2
    Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2
    CircusSam Edelman Brice Flat Tassle Sandals 096, Black Multi, 6 USCaparros Maddy Rhinestone T-Strap Dress Sandals, Silver Metallic, 9.5US Displaynaturalizer Cyprine Slide Mule Peep Toe Sandals 024, White, 9.5 US / 39.5 EU , Via Spiga Parker Flats Sandals 814, Tawny, 6 US / 36 EU , Nine West Ivarene Ruched Slide Sandals 185, Black/Black, 7 USI35 Sadiee Strappy Dress Sandals 563, Black Suede, 5.5 USI35 Kayden Block Heel Peep Toe Bootie Sandals 761, Black, 8 USCaparros Maddy Rhinestone T-Strap Dress Sandals, Silver Metallic, 5.5US Display , Carlos Carlos Santana Marsalis Platform Pumps 826, Black, 8 US / 38 EUTahari Doe Heeled Tie Up Sandals 937, Ballet Pink, 7.5 USA35 Cremena Sparkle Strappy Dress Sandals, Silver, 10 USSteve Madden Softey Sherling Cuffed Slide Sandals 129, White, 6 US , Franco Sarto Margie Block Heel Sandals 333, Taupe, 6 US / 36 EU , Marc Fisher Hasina Platform Sandals 355, Dark Natural, 5 USNina Fanetta T-Strap Evening Sandals 663, Silver Diamond, 9.5 USNina Vinnie Ankle-Strap Evening Sandals 194, Silver Bliss, 10 USJessica Simpson Kiandra Flat Thong Sandals 033, Powder, 10 US / 40 EUI35 Carma5 Rhinestone T Strap Sandals 476, Silver, 8.5 US , SC35 Paycee Dress Heels Sandals 400, Black, 8 USNina Originals Summer Fisherman Sandals 471, Black, 9 US , TS35 Felisa Platform Rhinestone Evening Sandals 977, Gold, 7.5 US , Naughty Monkey Montana Jones Slingback Sandals, Black, 9 US / 40.5 EUB35 Nelly Platform Gladiator Sandals 096, Black, 5.5 USGB35 Maggiee Slingback Mule Sandals 961, Black Suede, 6.5 USNina Vitalia Slingback Dress Sandals, Taupe, 9 USI35 Sharee2 Strappy Sparkle Dress Sandals, Champagne, 9.5 W US , SC35 Paycee Dress Heels Sandals 381, Black, 9 USMarc Fisher Julee Elastic Strap Heeled Gladiator Sandals 816, Black, 6 US , Jessica Simpson Kiandra Flat Thong Sandals, Sand Castle, 9 US / 39 EU ,
    Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2 ->Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2 -
    CLARKS ORIGINALS 72073 - Woman Desert Boot Size: - Color: , Rialto Marshall Pointed Toe Loafer Heels, Blue/Patentnew $380 PREVATA 'Dayton' bone croco leather slip-on loafers flats shoes - ItalyPatricia Green Women's Belinda Espadrille Slide Gold Leather EspadrillesTHIERRY RABOTIN DARK NAVY Solid Lena Comfort Loafer Shoes Sz 38.5 8.5 Bin 3443NOVELLA VINTAGE WOMEN LOAFERS M M BROWN LEATHER MADE IN ITALYNEW ALEGRIA PALOMA SHOES WHITE MARY JANE PAL-600SW WIDE WIDTH , 52408 auth TOD'S caramel leather Penny Loafers Flats Shoes 38Gorgeous!! Aquatalia Italy Black Suede Cutout Mary Jane Heels Sandals sz 10 $550 , Xtreme 808 Fuchsia Blue 8" High Heel Fetish Glitter Ombre Effect Platform Shoe , New Supersoft by Diana Ferrari Renzo Black Leather Low Wedge Size 9NEW $195 POUR le VICTOIRE Pink Snakeskin Pumps sz 7.5 B Classic Heels Shoes , Rockport Cobb Hill Women's Shayla Dress Pump - Choose SZ/Color , Gentleman/Lady manolo blahnik Complete specification range new Seasonal promotionAlaskan Malamute Running Shoes For Women-Free Shipping , Guess GWKENDRALL Women's Sandals, White, Size 8.5 M 5 inches heelAdidas Men's Speed Trainer 3.0 Ankle-High Baseball Shoe , NIKE AIR MAX MOTION LW BLACK WHITE RUNNING Mens (833260-010) Size 12 NEW in boxAdidas Harden Vol. 2 Basketball Shoes - Men's 9.5, OliveAsics Tartherzeal 6 Wide Deep Aqua Volt White Men Running Shoes TJR292-401Ted Baker Marar Oxford Brogue Details Black Patent Leather Size 10.5Prada Men's Graphic Arrow Printed Sneaker Black Yellow 6113 Sz 40 EUR , Authentic Rare Balenciaga Arena Rouge Grenat Sz 43 EU Mint Retail $585 , ECCO Men's Lisbon Cap Toe Tie Oxford - Choose SZ/ColorAdidas WOMEN'S EQT SUPPORT ADV PK W ENERGY AQUA/WHITE BZ0006 - BRAND NEW IN BOXnike free 5.0 womens running trainers 724383 503 sneakers shoesAsics Womens Gel Nimbus 20 T850N Indigo Blue/Indigo Blue/Opal Green Size 6.5New Womens Suede Hidden Wedge Heels Embroidery Floral Knee High Boots Shoes NewNew J Slides Womens Austin Brown Cowboy, Western Boots Size 7Womens Stretchy boots Thigh High Boots High Heels Pull On Over the knee Boot
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nina Nina Dress Fayette Platform Dress Sandals Sandals 139, Soft Platino Diamond, 9.5 US b90bfd2