Never miss an update

New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: New leather
Fastening: Lace Up Style: Casual
Pattern: Textured Leather Upper, Rubber Sole Brand: Nike
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7.5/UK 5.5/EU 38 Product Line: Match Classic Premium
Color: Black Country/Region of Manufacture: China
Width: Medium (b, M) UPC: 00886736296661
Never miss an update

New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1 -

    New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1
    New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1
    Nike Air Force 1 Ultra Force Mid Black - Womens - Size 6.5 B , Women's Skechers Sneakers - Galaxies-WITTY TALK - Black/Multi - New!! , Onitsuka Tiger Mexico 66 - Blue - WomensSKECHERS Women’s Winter Boots Size 6 Black Suede .....S26 , Nike Women's Flex Experience RN 5 Running Shoe , Asics Gel Contend 4 Shoes Wide Width Womens Shoes , Nike Juvenate Women's Running Shoes Light Bone White 724979-008 Size 10.5 NEWNIB NIKE AIR MAX WRIGHT LTD GREY RED ATHLETIC RUNNING SHOES 6Y = WOMENS 7.5 , adidas Tubular Shadow Shoes Women's 6.5 grey , NIKE FORCE SKY HI Wedge Sneaker Shoes Women’s 629746-100 White Gray US 8.5 USED*Men/Women Easy Spirit Women's Punter Ideal gift for all occasions modern Valuable boutiqueWomen's Reebok 7344 Princess Sneaker Black Brand New , Skechers Women's Seager Frills & Thrills Mary Jane , Converse Chuck Taylor All Star Ox Shoes 551625F White Low Top Textile CanvasMen/Women Moxie Trades Women's Tara New product Stylish and fun Known for its excellent qualityAdidas Originals Womens Size 10 Tubular Invader Strap Black Leather Shoes PinkNEW New Balance 410 WL410BL Women's Sneakers shoes Black Size 7 US , Skechers Go Run Sonic Victory Womens Running Shoes Blue/Hot Pink Multiple Sizes , adidas Terrex Voyager DLX - Burgundy - Womens , Women's Skechers Ultra Flex Weave Away - Pink - Width: med - Cross Training , Nike Elite Shinsen Women's Casual Sneakers 7 (New)Adidas Maduro Running Women's Shoes Size 7.5NIKE WOMEN'S AIR MAX ZERO SHOES pure platinum 857661 013 MSRP $130womens nike free rn 2017 Size 7.5 , REEBOK 71 FREESTYLE HI Wmn's (M) Black Leather Hi-Top Lifestyle ShoesConverse Chuck Taylor All Star Low Top Canvas Women Shoes M9166 - Black/White , On Cloud Womens Cloudsurfer Pink Running Shoes Size 9.5 (430859) , Harley-Davidson Women's Zia Low-Top Athletic Sneakers Black Leather D83816 9.5Nike Zoom Womens Shoes Size 9.5 Stucture Triax 11 Bowerman Series White Blue
    New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1 ->New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1 -
    Remonte Women's Shanice 71 Mid Calf Boot Schwarz/Antik/Graphite Winter BootsStuart Weitzman Women's Tiemodel Over The Knee Black Stretch Boots Size 7.5 M , dolce and gabbana sequin mary jane pump, 36.5, brand new.DC SHOES ARGOSY GREY BLACK SS 2018 40 43 44 SHOES NEW SKATENEW TEVA TANZA LEATHER MEN'S SANDAL WEAR LEATHER HIKING TRAVEL BROWN SIZE US 11Dr Martens Jadon Daze Multi Daze Backhand 22726102 8 Eye Platform Boots , New Lola Canales Aska Womens Comfortable Leather Sandals Made In Spain , DANSKO Women's Clogs Slip-On Shoes Size 40 US 9.5-10 Gold Leather Wood Heels , BOBS from Skechers Womens Super Plush Flat- Pick SZ/Color.NWT Frye Leo Perforated Ankle Wrap Leather Espadrille Flat Sandals White Sz 6.524 HOUR COMFORT Rose Women Wide Width Durable Lightweight Leather Comfort Loafer , ☼ELEN☼ Escarpins - TRENDY TOO - Ref: 0848$130 Retail Vince Camuto Fenette Women’s Heels Shoes, Black, Size 5 M Eur 35Valentino Garavani Rockstud Black Patent Leather 10cm Pumps EU Size 37NWT JCREW Glitter Cora crisscross sandals Sz6.5 Buff Glitter H7334G by Guess Womens BERRIT Open Toe Casual Slingback Sandals , Chinese Laundry Women's My Girl Slide Sandal, Silver Metallic, Size 9.0 , Nike Kobe AD Mens Size 12 Basketball Shoes Black Gum 922482 006Skechers Men's Vigor 2.0 OxfordCamo10.5 M US , A519 Nike PG 1 Black Gold 878627-006 Mens Sneakers Size 10.5 NEW , Nike Men's Dunk High Pro sneakers shoes SB Black 305050-028 size 9 , Nike Jet Flight DS 2001 Size 10 Jordan kobeYeezy 500 Blush 10.5 Adidas Desert Rat Guaranteed Authentic, Receipt Inc. NIB , Womens Shoes Calvin Klein LALA Sporty Ballet Flats Ballerina Mesh Suede Fire RedNEW Puma ST Runner NL 358770-20 Womens Shoes Trainers Sneakers SALE , Nike womens 725061 401 Air Max 90 Ultra BR shoes gamma blueCabela's XPG Women's Snow Hikers Boots Nubuck Leather Gore-Tex Vibram Brown/MintRuby Shoo Juno Blue Womens Hi Heels Boots , Anthropologie X Howsty Fringe Ankle Boots Booties Suede Leather Block Heel 8 MLucky Brand Eesa Block Heel Pull On Ankle Booties 043, Chipmunk, 5 US / 35 EU ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    New Nike Black Match Classic Nike Premium Women’s Shoes Casual Shoes Black 896502-002 Size 7.5 e36cdc1
    Athletic Shoes