Never miss an update

Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e




Item specifics

Condition:
New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 8.5 US / 6.5 UK
Pattern: Solid Brand: Stuart Weitzman
Exact Heel Height: Not specified MPN: -Multi Botantic Embroidery
Product ID: 780978733550 Style: Riding, Equestrian
Width: Standard (B) Main Colour: MultiColor
UPC: 780978733550 EAN: 0780978733550
Never miss an update

Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e - blurrypron.com

    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e
    INC International Concepts LIBBI Womens Boots Black 7.5 US / 5.5 UKNEW JEFFREY CAMPBELL CZECH Chunky Platform Combat Bootie WineCrown Vintage nadia Womens Boots Black combo 6 US / 4 UKDr Martens 8-Hole 1460 Black Pink Yellow 13661010 Original Classic DocMen's/Women's Lucky Women's Lk-Riddick Riding Boot Quality products First batch of customers Cost-effective , Andre Assous Women's Paulette Chelsea Boot, Navy, Size 5.5 US / 3.5 UK , Mr/Ms Boot Horonero Maxi Sole Strong heat and wear resistance Modern and stylish fashion German OutletsMORI MADE IN ITALY KNEE HEELS BOOTS STIEFEL STIVALI SHOES LEATHER BLACK NERO 41Grinders Dallas BLACK ladies Real Leather Western Mid Calf Toe Boot Cowboy Boots , MORI ITALY PLATFORM OVERKNEE HIGH BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER RED 41 , Frances Valentine Women's Sonny Combat Boot, Black Leather, Size 9.0 US / 7 UKMiz Mooz nanna Womens Boots Black 6 US / 4 UKAUTHENTIC CELINE SIDE GOA LEATHER LOW BOOTS 322193 BLACK GRADE S USED -ATFRYE Women's Paige Tall-APU Riding Boot, Slate, Size 6.0 US / 4 UK , New Rock Womens Punk Boots Style 5815 S10 BlackVia Spiga Beline Womens Boots Black 5.5 US / 3.5 UKNew Rock Womens Rock Punk Gothic Boots Style 5815 S10 Black , MORI PLATFORM OVERKNEE HEELS ITALY STIEFEL BOOTS STRETCH LEATHER BLACK BLACK 42 , Charles David linden Womens Boots Black 7.5 US / 5.5 UK , Vasque Womens Boots Anthracite/Aluminum 6 US / 4 UKTory Burch 42164 Womens Boots Leopard, Leopard 6.5 US / 4.5 UKVince Women's Blakely Bootie Fashion Boot, Grey Velvet, Size 5.5 US / 3.5 UKDr Martens 8-Hole 1460 Brown Inuck 11822212 Original Classic Doc , Dr. Martens 1460 Classical Ankle boot Mono Smooth Tutta Black Shoes Studded ORI , Marc Fisher Instinct Womens Boots Black/ Suede 6 US / 4 UK , Dr Martens 8-Hole 1460 Coralie Cherry 15292601 Original Classic Doc , MORI OVERKNEE EXTREME NEW HEELS ITALY STIEFEL BOOTS STRETCH LEATHER RED ROSSO 38MORI ITALY PLATFORM HEELS KNEE HIGH BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER RED 38Donald J Pliner Patsy Womens Boots Black 9.5 US / 7.5 UK ,
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e - blurrypron.com>Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e - blurrypron.com
    Spring Step Women's Vladina Ankle BootLAURA VITA bottines réf SL26513-2 ERNAULT 02 violet P39 neuves AUT 2018 , Jack Rogers Women's Nell Faux Fur Suede High Boots 1197 Size 7.5Nike Downshifter 8 Mens Running Shoes (D) (002)Aerosoles Double Trouble Zip Up Ankle Boots 290, Black, 8 USWOMENS ADIDAS ADIZERO ADIOS BOOST 3 LADIES RUNNING/SNEAKERS/RUNNERS SHOES , Lacoste Sport Women s Marice BL 2 Spw Low, White Wht , 6 UKLadies Gabor Boots Mid Calf Label 72802-WVince Camuto Womens Pimmy Leather Closed Toe Ankle Fashion BootsTOD'S men shoes galaxy blue suede boat shoe braided raffia XXM0TV05300RE0U820BRAND NEW WOMENS SUPERSOFT BY DIANA FERRARI COMFORT ANKLE SHOE BOOTS SZ 7.5 , Casual Womens Med Block Heels Pointy Toes Slingbacks Sandals Leather Shoes PumpsCASADEI sz 9 womens Leather sandals / heels shoes RRP$800++ , Vionic Women's Gracie Slippers In Light GreySkechers Womens Bikers-Bold Step Fashion Boot- Select SZ/Color.Nike Mens Size 8 Metcon DSX Flyknit Black Grey Orange Purple Training ShoesNike Air Max Hyperposite Statue of Liberty sz 12 , Nike Zoom KD 11 XI Hot Punch Lime Blast Peach Jam EYBL Rare Limited Size 10.5 , OluKai Men's Kualono Boot Espresso/Black Full Grain Leather , Mens Bling Rhinestones Pointy Toe Flats Slip On Loafers Driving Evening ShoesDS Yeezy Season 2 Crepe Boot Size 9 US EUR Luxury Taupe Suede Kanye WestNew HUGO BOSS Mercedes Benz Navy Blue Mens 13 46 Leather Fashion Sneakers Oxford , Reef Mens Rover Mid Fgl Fashion Sneaker- Pick SZ/Color. , Boden Women's Hebe Leather Sneaker Multi-Bloom GG8 Size 37 (US:6.5) $140 , Man's/Woman's Adidas Gazelle W - BY9360 Reputation first online shop Comfortable and naturaladidas swift run womens Originals Size 7 Blue NWTNew ASICS GEL-Frantic 7 Running Shoes Women $90Nike Free RN Flyknit 2018 Womens 942839-800 Crimson Pulse Running Shoes Size 6 , New Steve Madden Toryyy Bootie women's size 8.5 , Call It Spring Womens Talchuano-99 Closed Toe Ankle Fashion Boots ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e
    Boots
    >
    ;