Never miss an update

Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e

Item specifics

New with tags: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item in the original packaging (such as the original box or bag) ... Read moreabout the condition
UK Shoe Size (Women's): 8.5 US / 6.5 UK
Pattern: Solid Brand: Stuart Weitzman
Exact Heel Height: Not specified MPN: -Multi Botantic Embroidery
Product ID: 780978733550 Style: Riding, Equestrian
Width: Standard (B) Main Colour: MultiColor
UPC: 780978733550 EAN: 0780978733550
Never miss an update

Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e -

    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e
    INC International Concepts LIBBI Womens Boots Black 7.5 US / 5.5 UKNEW JEFFREY CAMPBELL CZECH Chunky Platform Combat Bootie WineCrown Vintage nadia Womens Boots Black combo 6 US / 4 UK , Dr Martens 8-Hole 1460 Black Pink Yellow 13661010 Original Classic DocMen's/Women's Lucky Women's Lk-Riddick Riding Boot Quality products First batch of customers Cost-effectiveAndre Assous Women's Paulette Chelsea Boot, Navy, Size 5.5 US / 3.5 UKMr/Ms Boot Horonero Maxi Sole Strong heat and wear resistance Modern and stylish fashion German OutletsMORI MADE IN ITALY KNEE HEELS BOOTS STIEFEL STIVALI SHOES LEATHER BLACK NERO 41 , Grinders Dallas BLACK ladies Real Leather Western Mid Calf Toe Boot Cowboy Boots , MORI ITALY PLATFORM OVERKNEE HIGH BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER RED 41 , Frances Valentine Women's Sonny Combat Boot, Black Leather, Size 9.0 US / 7 UK , Miz Mooz nanna Womens Boots Black 6 US / 4 UKAUTHENTIC CELINE SIDE GOA LEATHER LOW BOOTS 322193 BLACK GRADE S USED -AT , FRYE Women's Paige Tall-APU Riding Boot, Slate, Size 6.0 US / 4 UK , New Rock Womens Punk Boots Style 5815 S10 Black , Via Spiga Beline Womens Boots Black 5.5 US / 3.5 UK , New Rock Womens Rock Punk Gothic Boots Style 5815 S10 BlackMORI PLATFORM OVERKNEE HEELS ITALY STIEFEL BOOTS STRETCH LEATHER BLACK BLACK 42Charles David linden Womens Boots Black 7.5 US / 5.5 UKVasque Womens Boots Anthracite/Aluminum 6 US / 4 UKTory Burch 42164 Womens Boots Leopard, Leopard 6.5 US / 4.5 UK , Vince Women's Blakely Bootie Fashion Boot, Grey Velvet, Size 5.5 US / 3.5 UK , Dr Martens 8-Hole 1460 Brown Inuck 11822212 Original Classic Doc , Dr. Martens 1460 Classical Ankle boot Mono Smooth Tutta Black Shoes Studded ORI , Marc Fisher Instinct Womens Boots Black/ Suede 6 US / 4 UK , Dr Martens 8-Hole 1460 Coralie Cherry 15292601 Original Classic DocMORI OVERKNEE EXTREME NEW HEELS ITALY STIEFEL BOOTS STRETCH LEATHER RED ROSSO 38 , MORI ITALY PLATFORM HEELS KNEE HIGH BOOTS STIEFEL BOOTS LEATHER RED 38 , Donald J Pliner Patsy Womens Boots Black 9.5 US / 7.5 UK ,
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e ->Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e -
    Isabel Marant knee high western boots in brown Calf leatherNike Air Huarache Run Womens Trainers Black White Branded Footwear , SUPERSOFT BY DIANA FERRARI FARLEE WOMENS SHOES CASUAL SANDALS SZ 10c~ sky blue , MW009756 - FASHION STUDDED SLIP ON LOAFERS (SIZE 34 - 41) , Gentlemen/Ladies NEW Sam Edelman Platform heels Durable service New products in 2018 As of the latest modelBeautifeel US 9 Eu 40 Black /Taupe Suede Lthr Slingback Wedge Sandals Shoes NEW , Toe Warmers Women's Active Waterproof Boot Black Hook and LoopRockport Women's Cobb Hill Adrina Dress Pump Grey Size 6.0Women's Platform Wedge High Heel Casual Comfort Thick Sole Round Toe Shoes SizeStuart Weitzman Bestgal Women Pumps black - SatinSexy Womens Stiletto Leather Pointed Toe High Heels Pumps Party Shoes Plus Size100% AUTH NEW WOMEN LOUBOUTIN No PRIVE 120 GLITTER MINI SLINGBACKS HEELS US 7 , OAKLEY Mens Black Ripcord Sneaker GOLF Shoe 14035-100 Sz 11.5 , ADIDAS PW TENNIS HU BY8715 RAW PINK WHITE DS SIZE: 10 , Nike Air Foamposite One “EGGPLANT” 314996 008 Size 8 Varsity Purple/Black PennyNike Lunar Control Vapor 2 Golf Shoes Sz 9 100% Authentic Wolf Grey 899633 001Men's/Women's Nike Shoe 10 Innovative design Highly praised and appreciated by the consumer audience a lot of varieties , NEW Nike Kobe XI 11 Elite Low EASTER DARK GREY BRIGHT MANGO 822675-078 sz 11Air Jordan V (5) Retro (Flight Suit)Authentic Nike Air Jordan 13 XIII Cherry Chicago DS New Black Red White Size 11 , Thorogood 6'' Plain Toe Wedge 814-4516 Black Walnut Men Leather Work Ankle BootsAdidas Porsche Typ 64 2.3 men's casual shoes brown metallic sneakers NEWRodolphe Menudier White Leather High Top Sneaker Size 46 , JEFFREY CAMPBELL WOMAN CASUAL SNEAKER SHOES WITH WEDGE CODE ZOMG STUDS CANVAS , Nike WMNS Air Max 90 Ultra Essential [724981-002] Women Casual Shoe Grey US 7.5 , Columbia Women's Dakota Drifter Mid Waterproof Trail Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , New Balance W775V2 Running Shoe-W Womens 775v2 Shoe- Choose SZ/Color.NEW GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI WOMENS KRISS WINTER - Black size 11 (original price $850)Boots Black Simply Vera Wang Size 6 Shoes NEW Women's Emsley $109.99 Knee , Retro Womens Leather Ankle Boots Buckle Punk Gothic Motorcycle Knight Shoes Size
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Stuart Weitzman Women's Pure Ankle 27128 Boot, MultiColor, Women's Size 8.5 Boot, US/ 6.5 UK 22e6e9e