Never miss an update

Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Accents: gold stars
Material: Faux Leather Model: The Stella-Suede
Width: Medium (B, M) Modified Item: No
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 37.5 Style: heels
Color: navy Fastening: zip
Occasion: Evening & Party Exact Heel Height: 4.5"
Brand: Katie Perry US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7.5
Heel Type: Slim Heel Height: Very High Heel (4 1/2 in or More)
Never miss an update

Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938 -

    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938
    BIRKENSTOCK Madrid Oiled Leather Sandals Habana L7-7.5JBU by Jambu Wpmens Blossom Grey Vegan Mary Jane Sandals Flat 9.5M $90Man's/Woman's Fitflop size 6 Innovative design Elegant style British temperamentCole Haan Women's Zerogrand Slide Platform Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorChic Women Sandals Leather Hollow Out Retro Platform Wedge Heels Shoes Plus sz , Teva Terra Fi Lite Leather Black Sandals Womens Size 9 *NIB* , Gentleman/Lady Sergio Rossi Rainbow Satin Sandals 37 superior high quality Clearance salePikolinos Romano Green Black Floral Cut Out Sling Back Shoes 39 8.5 9 , Kenneth Cole Reaction Womens Log Line Suede Peep Toe SandalsGentleman/Lady Women’s Birkenstock Granada Brown Sandals 37 Diverse new design First grade in its class Quality and consumer firstDisney Belle Bridal Flip Flops for Women by Havaianas Swarovski Blue Size 6 NEWCrocs Isabella Huarache Cerulean Blue/Turquoise Women's Size , COLE HAAN Pink and Orange Sandals, Size 10, NWOBJ CREW MARBELLA COLORBLOCK SANDALS BURGUNDY SIZE 8.5 B6657Via Spiga Reese White Shoes Sandals sz us 5 M NEW $175VICTORIAS SECRET PINK METALLIC DOUBLE STRAP SLIDES FLIP FLOPS SANDALS MEDIUM 7 8 , TEVA ALP PREMIER BLACK WEBBING UPPER WOMEN'S SPORT SANDALS SIZE US 11/NEWCole Haan Adderly Wedge Beige Womens Shoes Size 9.5 M Sandals MSRP $160Authentic Burberry Leather Sandals Flip Flops Flats Size 39 1/2 Black , Women's Pikolinos Red & Bronze Sunflower Slides Wedge Sandals Sz 38 US 7.5-8Flexus by Spring Step Women's Faithful , TORY BURCH Spring T-Small Ivory Wedge Flip Flop Size 11 New , CLARKS Women's Saylie Jade Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , New Olukai 20290 OX40 HO'OPIO Leather Onyx/Black Women's Sandals US 9Jack Rogers Hamptons Classic Flat Thong Sandals, Women's Size 6M, Gold , Dr. Comfort Kelly Women's Supportive Slide San Black - 8 Medium-Wide , Women's Boden Navy Suede Platform Cork Sandal sz 39 EUC worn 1xJessica Simpson Plemy Nude Blush Crystal Satin High Heel Ankle Strap Sandal 10Sam Edelman Womens Yaro Silver Metallic Heeled Sandal Size 5.5 M ,
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5>Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5
    Nine West Women's Hannigan Leather Ankle BootieFRYE Distressed Melissa Brown Leather Boots Sz.7 , Jessica Simpson Women's Lalaine Wedge Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Stuart Weitzman Gold Buckle Brown Suede Clog Mule Heels 7M , Womens Real Leather Rhinestone Paillette Bowknot Chunky High Heels Sandals A458 , 100% Authentic NEW IN BOX Escada Black and Brown D’Orsay Pumps Heels Shoes 36 6Calvin Klein Collection | Black Leather Wedges size , Gentleman/Lady Bed Stu Cameroon Leather Sandal Easy to clean surface Elegant and sturdy packaging Popular recommendation , NIB Tory Burch Melinda Black or Gold Thong Patent Leather with Gold Sandals 8.5Under Armour Men's Charged Bandit 3 Running 1295725-752 Quirky Lime Blue 12.5-13Vans x Marvel Avengers SK8-Hi Captain Marvel VN0A38GEUBI New W/Box DS Men SZ 5.5 , SHIHWEISPORT ASICS T3N2N-7501 KAYANO 20 RUNNING SHOE *CLEARANCE * , Under Armour Men's SpeedForm Phenom Athletic Shoes Green/Grey/Orange Size 12.0M , Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Flyknit Mens Running Shoe Blue/White 875943 400 Sz 10 , Nike Air Max Flair Black & Neo Turquoise Running Shoes Sz 10 NEW 942236 010PUMA x McQ Collection Men's McQ Cell Track Lo Sneakers , Mezlan 6427 Mens Elva Chelsea BootUK/13US- Choose SZ/Color. , Mephisto Mens Igor Slip-on Loafer- Pick SZ/Color. , Steven Land Men's Tan Genuine Leather Monk Strap Dress Shoes SL0039 , Florsheim Men's Jenson Penny Loafer Slip-On - Choose SZ/Color , Women's Asics Gel Kayano 19 Aqua Running Sneaker (7) , Z Coil Womens Slip On Slides Gray Suede Pain Relief Comfort Shoes Spring S 11W , WOMENS UNDER ARMOUR HOVR SONIC Sz 7.5 LADIES RUNNING/TRAINING/RUNNERS SHOESNike Zoom All Out Low Women's Bordeaux/Tea Berry/Pure Platinum 78671605 , Nike Shot Caller Trainers Womens Black/White Sneakers Sports Shoes Footwear , Women's Nike Air More Money LX New AJ1312-002 Patent Triple Black Lux QS Sz 7.5NIKE AIR ZOOM MARIAH FLYKNIT RACER WOMEN'S sz 12 RUNNING SHOES AA0521-005 , Sam Edelman Larkin Suede Ankle Boot - Size 10 Olive Green Fall Heel Zip BootiesNWOB $197.95 MSRP Vince Camuto KRITON Black Knee High Riding Boots sz 5.5Easy Spirit Women's Karessa Gladiator Sandal - Choose SZ/color
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938