Never miss an update

Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Accents: gold stars
Material: Faux Leather Model: The Stella-Suede
Width: Medium (B, M) Modified Item: No
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 37.5 Style: heels
Color: navy Fastening: zip
Occasion: Evening & Party Exact Heel Height: 4.5"
Brand: Katie Perry US Shoe Size (Women's): US 7.5
Heel Type: Slim Heel Height: Very High Heel (4 1/2 in or More)
Never miss an update

Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938 - blurrypron.com

    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938
    BIRKENSTOCK Madrid Oiled Leather Sandals Habana L7-7.5 , JBU by Jambu Wpmens Blossom Grey Vegan Mary Jane Sandals Flat 9.5M $90 , Man's/Woman's Fitflop size 6 Innovative design Elegant style British temperamentCole Haan Women's Zerogrand Slide Platform Sandal - Choose SZ/ColorChic Women Sandals Leather Hollow Out Retro Platform Wedge Heels Shoes Plus szTeva Terra Fi Lite Leather Black Sandals Womens Size 9 *NIB*Gentleman/Lady Sergio Rossi Rainbow Satin Sandals 37 superior high quality Clearance salePikolinos Romano Green Black Floral Cut Out Sling Back Shoes 39 8.5 9Kenneth Cole Reaction Womens Log Line Suede Peep Toe Sandals , Gentleman/Lady Women’s Birkenstock Granada Brown Sandals 37 Diverse new design First grade in its class Quality and consumer firstDisney Belle Bridal Flip Flops for Women by Havaianas Swarovski Blue Size 6 NEWCrocs Isabella Huarache Cerulean Blue/Turquoise Women's SizeCOLE HAAN Pink and Orange Sandals, Size 10, NWOBJ CREW MARBELLA COLORBLOCK SANDALS BURGUNDY SIZE 8.5 B6657 , Via Spiga Reese White Shoes Sandals sz us 5 M NEW $175VICTORIAS SECRET PINK METALLIC DOUBLE STRAP SLIDES FLIP FLOPS SANDALS MEDIUM 7 8TEVA ALP PREMIER BLACK WEBBING UPPER WOMEN'S SPORT SANDALS SIZE US 11/NEWCole Haan Adderly Wedge Beige Womens Shoes Size 9.5 M Sandals MSRP $160 , Authentic Burberry Leather Sandals Flip Flops Flats Size 39 1/2 BlackWomen's Pikolinos Red & Bronze Sunflower Slides Wedge Sandals Sz 38 US 7.5-8Flexus by Spring Step Women's Faithful , TORY BURCH Spring T-Small Ivory Wedge Flip Flop Size 11 NewCLARKS Women's Saylie Jade Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , New Olukai 20290 OX40 HO'OPIO Leather Onyx/Black Women's Sandals US 9 , Jack Rogers Hamptons Classic Flat Thong Sandals, Women's Size 6M, Gold , Dr. Comfort Kelly Women's Supportive Slide San Black - 8 Medium-Wide , Women's Boden Navy Suede Platform Cork Sandal sz 39 EUC worn 1xJessica Simpson Plemy Nude Blush Crystal Satin High Heel Ankle Strap Sandal 10Sam Edelman Womens Yaro Silver Metallic Heeled Sandal Size 5.5 M
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5>Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5
    STELLA McCARTNEY Shoes 590454 Black 36NEW BURBERRY Lyndhurst House Check Brown Suede Flat Ankle Boots (Size 37) - $795Gentlemen/Ladies LADIES SHOES/FOOTWEAR -Steplite sandal Cornell grey Easy to clean surface Online export store Fashion dynamic , NIB Tory Burch Ludlow Patent Petit Croc Print Driving Driver Loafers Size 8.5Versace 19.69 1020 CAP ELIOS CORALLO ballerina shoes Women's Fuchsia US , Vince Camuto Signature Carmin Women's Black Ivory Leather Flat Sz 8.5M 1976 , Donald J Pliner Couture Cone Heel Mules Sandals Shoes Textured Brown Peep 6M , AGL Slip On Leather Pump Dark Black Sz 39.5 , VANESSA BRUNO Escarpins très chic en cuir verni couleur Noir , Jessica Simpson JS-BANSI Womens Bansi- Choose SZ/Color. , Versace 19.69 Italia Womens Sandal Gold LETITIA , Gorgeous Sandals Hand Crafted Sandals Free PostageWomen's Nike Classic Cortez Premium Casual Shoes Size 8 in White. NEW!K-Swiss Women's Clean Court SDE CMF Sneaker - Choose SZ/Coloradidas Men's Original Pro Model White/Black/White - S85956 , Men's Nike Free RN Motion Flyknit Size 14 (834584 600) No BoxVlado Men's Milo 2 Sneaker Cream White Denim Fleece Sneakers , New Balance Classics 500 Men's Sneakers Shoes Grey GM500KSR GM500 TrainersADIDAS NMD R1 STLT PK SZ 9 TRACE OLIVE CORE BLACK SOLAR SLIME PRIMEKNIT CQ2389 , Tommy Bahama Legzira Beach Boots - Men's Size 10.5 D, BlackTommy Hilfiger Genuine Leather Men Oxford Shoes Size 10 M Brown Style M14440Bruno Magli Branson Mens Dress Shoes Derby Hand-Made Italy Black 10 M Cap-ToeVANS Sk8 Hi Reissue (Stitch Checkers) Blue Mirage Skate Shoes WOMEN'S 8Merrell Riveter Knit Loop Women's Size 7 Castlerock 25%OFF , Authentic Nike Women 683635-105 Air Max Tailwind 7 Sneakers Shoes Size 6.5Chocolate 2.5" Hidden Wedge Round Toe Ankle Boot Size 6.5LOEFFLER RANDALL Womens Fenton Rain Bootie gold tone buckle back zip 10Womens Fashion Winter Buckle Strap Pointy Toe Block Low Heels Leather Ankle BootSteve Madden Gellar Ankle Boots, Taupe, 6.5 USWomens Ankle Boots Buckle High Heel Rivet Roma Chic Winter Fashion New Stilett
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938 - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Shoes sz 7.5 Katy Perry Stella back blue 4.5" suede Katy gold stars strappy 4.5" heel back zip feb1938
    Sandals
    >
    ;