Never miss an update

Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba




Item specifics

Condition:
New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 10.5
Brand: Nike Style: Basketball Shoes
Country/Region of Manufacture: Vietnam Color: White
Product Line: Hyperdunk Width: Medium (B, M)
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 42.5 UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba - blurrypron.com

    Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba
    Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba
    Nike WMNS Court Borough Low Premium Sneakers Gray Black Pink Sz 9.5 861533-003Adidas Adilette Cloadform Armad BB3732 MULTI Womens Size 10 , Gentlemen/Ladies NO NAME Picadilly Mastic Elegant and sturdy set meal Let our products go to the world Different styles and styles , Men's/Women's Apex Women's Ambulator Biomechanical New Listing High-quality materials Pick up at the boutiqueNike Blazer Mid Suede Vintage Woman's Basketball Shoes Orange 518171 801 Size 9 , Nike Air Max IVO Running Shoes Black Silver Pink Women's size 9 US , Nike Womens 6 Air Max Thea Ultra FK Running Shoes Geranium Blue Tint 881175 603 , Asic Gel-Kayano 23 Black Carbon T696N-9099 Running Shoes Women's Sizes 6.5, 10.5Nike Presto Fly SE Running Shoes Size 8 Womens Black Trainers 910570 006 New , WOMENS ADIDAS EQT SUPPORT ADV SZ 7.5 SOFT NEONS PACK GREY CHALK CORAL CQ2254 , Nike Womens 7 Air Max Thea Ultra FK Running Shoes Geranium Blue Tint 881175 603New Womens Nike Air Zoom Vapor X HC Tennis Shoes AA8027-801 Sz 9 Tangerine Tint , Nike Women's Air Pegasus 83 KJCRD Running Shoes Size 5 to 10 us 828406 004Nike Tailwind 6 Running Women's Shoes Size 5 , Reebok Women's Club Memt Track Shoe,white/steel,8 M USWomen's Shoes Ecco BLUMA Ballerina Flats Slip On Leather and Textile COBALTNike Roshe Two Flyknit V2 Womens Running Shoes Sz 8 White Wolf Gym SneakersFRYE Melanie Gore Perforated Mule Sneakers, Black , ASICS Running Shoes LADY GEL-KAYANO24 TJG758 Dark Blue US8(25cm)Adidas Training Women's Arianna Cloudfoam Shoes Size 5 to 10 us BA8745 , New Balance WCOASBO2 D Wide Black Navy Women Running Shoes Slip-On WCOASBO2DNike Free 5.0 Tr Fit 4 Team Women's Shoes Size 10.5NIKE AIR JORDAN SPIZIKE ID GLOW IN THE DARK/BLACK SIZE WOMEN'S 5.5 [605241-999]Man's/Woman's NEW JUST CAVALLI WOMENS SNEAKERS Elegant appearance delicate leading the fashionNike W Lunar Force Flyknit Work boot sz 6.5 Olive 860558 200 Women's dunk LF1Saucony Freedom ISO Size 9.5 M (B) Women's Running Shoes Blue S10355-3Nike Court Force Hi Premium Madeira/Madeira-Black Cheetah 317072-221 SZ 10Nike Women's Air MAx Torch 4 Running Shoes Black/Metallic Rose Gold Size 6 , Mizuno Women Dynamotion Fit Wave Inspire 11 Running Training Shoes Sneakers NEW
    Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba - blurrypron.com>Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba - blurrypron.com
    Size 11.5 D TONY LAMA Brown Leather COWBOY BOOTS Country Western Style , Womens FRYE CELIA 225928 cognac tall pull on shearling boots sz. 7.5Skechers Equalizer Persistent Mens Memory Foam Shoes/Slip Ons Lightweight , Puma Roma Classic Gum Low-Top Sneakers, Black Team Gold, 4 UK , Women's New Black Suede Steve Madden Gladiator Sandals With Fringing Size 6.5Bogs Classic Tall Wellington Boots Vintage Floral Neoprene Wellies Womens 72257SKECHERS RELAX FIT SHOES - MEMORY FOAM - SZ 7.5 - NWOB - B-SHO-3Man/Woman Not Rated Women's Timor Fashion Sneaker feature Cheaper than the price Perfect processingAUTH FANCY PRADA TASSEL LOAFER SHOES 1D779E LACCA SOLEIL US 8.5New Franco Sarto FANTANA Women Suede Booties , Womens Ivanka Trump Baird black perforated suede slingback pumps sz. 8Cole Haan Women's Cheetah Print Pointed Toe Pump 2683 Size 7B , NEW Over Women's Heels Peep Toe Ankle Strap Color Stiching Pumps Stilettos , Victoria’s Secret PINK SET IOWA STATE Hawkeyes Metallic Slides M + Tumbler NWT , Women Pointed Toe Mule Slipper Sandal Shoes Embroidery Floral Mesh Flats Leisure , Gentlemen/Ladies NEW JOIE WOMENS MALINA SANDAL Best-selling worldwide auction businessNIKE mens full zip hoodie waterproof rain jacket 655317 995 size L , Nike Air Jordan Retro I Laser OG HI 705289 100 Size 12 Royal Chicago Wings 2Sneakers AirMax 2017 color: Blue and BlackNIKE AIR MAX 90 ULTRA 2.0 SE 876005-001 COOL GREY-WOLF GREY SZ 9 , Air Jordan 5 Blue Suede Size 10 VNDS , Nike Air Lebron XI Black Everglades size 14 , Nike Air Max 97 Plus Silver Shark White Midnight Navy Men's Trainers All Size , Blundstone Mens Black 510 Boots Size 11 US 10 AU , Vintage Men's GOKEY Brown Bullhide Leather Sauvage Hunting Snake Boots , Steve Madden Men's Teller Chelsea Boot Black Suede , Nike Women's Free 5.0 - Bright Grape/White/Volt Shade/Legion Red (642199-501)Mens Burgundy Genuine Lizard Exotic Crocodile Dress ShoesAsics Gel Excite 4 Women's T6E8N.3393 Grape/Silver/Begonia Pink Running Shoes , Converse Pride x Miley Cyrus Chuck Taylor All Star Platform High Top LGBT shoe 8
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Nike Womens Hyperdunk 2016 High High Basketball Basketball Shoes White 10.5 844391 110 Size 10.5 ba398ba
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;