Never miss an update

The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Snow, Winter Boots
Pattern: Solid US Shoe Size (Women's): 7
Fastening: Lace Up Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
Color: Desert Palm Brown/Balsam Blue Material: Leather
Occasion: Casual Width: Medium (B, M)
Brand: The North Face UPC: 700054484794
Never miss an update

The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e - blurrypron.com

    The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e
    The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e
    FENDI ZUCCA LOGO RAIN BOOTS SHOES 36/6 , Frye Womens Jayden Button Graphite Tall Riding Boots Shoe Size 11 MPikolinos Ordino W8M-8919 Brandy Womens Leather Ankle Boots , New Women's BED STU Becca Rustic Red Leather Ankle Boots Size 7 , STEVEN by Steve Madden Leather Open Toe Ankle Shoeties in BlackAsh MUSE Embroidered Shearling Black Suede Boots Booties Size 39/9 US $260Frye Melissa Button Back Zip Cognac Leather Riding Boots Womens 9.5NIB Women's boots Miz Mooz Dalia Chelsea Boot olive Western Style - many size , El Naturalista Womens Nd89 Bee Oxford /- Select SZ/Color. , ZARA 100% LEATHER OVER THE KNEE HIGH HEEL BOOTS RED EU35, US5, 6014/201 , Rockport Women's Danii Side Zip Ankle Bootie Brown 7 M USAlberto Fermani Gold Color Leather Vittoria Ankle Boots Women Shoe Size 37 , Miz Mooz Womens Nichola Leather Closed Toe Knee High Fashion, Nutmeg, Size 7.0 f , NIB FRYE Danica Harness Ankle Boot Open Toe Booties Chestnut Suede Women's Sz 10NIB Anthropologie Vanessa Wu gray green Suede Platform Wedge Bootie 39 8.5/9 , NEW Anthropologie Kupuri Yves Wrap Ankle Boots Heels Size 39 Burgundy Leather , Cinzia Araia H Lorenzo EU37 US 7 New In Box $665 Boots Sneakers Post ApocalypticDr. Martens R22115403 - TALIB Size: - Color:Geox Womens D Mendi ST B- Nappa Leather Closed Toe Knee High, Coffee, Size 6.0 , Frye Gray Leather Suede Western Pull On Ankle Boots Womens Sz 7.5 B Never Worn , STUART WEITZMAN Women's Black Leather Ankle Boots Made in Spain Shoe Size 8.5M , PRADA Black Leather Knee Boots, US 6.5 , Womens 9.5 B M Lucchese 1883 Tan Suede Turquoise Leather Snip Toe Cowboy BootsSold Out Anthropologie Miss Albright Crossed Suede Booties Size 8 NewNIB Anthropologie Kelsi Dagger tan brown Oil Suede Strappy Wedge Ankle Boots 8FRYE Woman's Brown Leather Dorado Tall Riding Boots Goodyear Welt Size 10 MNew DANNER Mountain Low 600 Women's 8.5 Gray /Plum Hiking Boot 62264 RETAIL $160Muck Arctic Weekend Purple Womens All-Purpose Winter Rubber Boots , Corral Women's 14-inch Circle G Filigree Leather Boots - Distressed Green/Beige ,
    The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e - blurrypron.com>The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e - blurrypron.com
    Sergio rossi Shoes 690841 Grey 36.5 , Adidas Unisex NMD R2 Runner PK Primeknit Navy Navy White BB2952 SIZE 4-11Supremo Womens 5820304 Hi-Top Trainers, Schwarz Black 00001, 5 UKLadies Blue Open Toe Slingback Anti Stress Reiker Sandals 608B4 , Ladies / Womens Full Sheepskin Calf Length Short Straight Boot , Gumboots -Rose Print Knee High Tall - Womens - Size 8 / 39 , BIRKENSTOCK Profi Birki's Womens Size 8-8.5 Gray Washable Synth Work/Play ClogsEasy Spirit Carmela black leather pump 2.5 " heels sz 10 WIDE New , VIA SPIGA GREAT LOOKING, PINK PATENT LEATHER , SIZE7.5, PLATFORM , Steve Madden Women's Carmelaa Rose Gold Heels Women’s 8.5 , Man/Woman gjg Shoes Blue 24.5cm Online Shopping Stylish and fun comfortableTARYN ROSE NWOT Womens Slides Size 38 8 Snakeskin Brown Copper Heels ItalyMOT-CLe 696a Navy Velour / Leather Round Toe Block Heel Pumps 37.5 / US 7.5 , NWB Women's Nike Court Borough Mid Se Sneaker Shoes 916793 SZ 6.5 7 Black White , Lacoste Ansted 318 1 U - Tan - Mens28 New Mens Nike Air Huarache Running Bo Jackson Khaki Shoes 318429-120 SZ 11.5 , Mens Adidas Tubular Invader Strap - BB1398 - Triple Black TrainersASICS S532N.9090 Mens JB Elite TR Wrestling-Shoes 1- Choose SZ/Color.AIR JORDAN 13 RETRO 414571-103 white/metallic silver Size 10 , Mens Faux Leather Flat Slip On Loafers Punk Rivet Nightclub Sneakers Flats Shoes , Allen Edmonds Black Men's Oxford Cap Toe Shoes Rubber Sole 11.5 EEE WideNIB Nike Thea black sneaker size 6.5 , Funtasma Women's Gogo 305 Red/White Stretch PatentBROOKS LAUNCH 3 WOMENS RUNNING SHOES (B) (486)adidas Originals Gazelle W Ash Green White Women Casual Shoes Sneakers CQ2189WMNS Nike Air Max 90 PREM SZ 7 Black Sail Gum Brown 443817-010 , New Balance Women's 720v3 Comfort Ride Running Shoe - Choose SZ/Color , Joya Interlaken Low PTX Black/Blue Women's US Size 8.5 (Euro 39.2) , Men/Women Kamik Women's Momentums Snow Boot superior High-quality materials Beautiful and charmingAldo Womens Mykala Closed Toe Ankle Cold Weather Boots Grey Nabuck Size 10.0 n ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    The North Face NWB Womens Shellista marcanthony-17521 II Desert Palm Face 7 Brown/Balsam Blue Size 7 abd389e
    Boots
    >
    ;