Never miss an update

The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d




Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Style: Snow, Winter Boots
Pattern: Solid US Shoe Size (Women's): 7
Fastening: Lace Up Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
Color: Tarmac Green Material: Leather
Occasion: Casual Width: Medium (B, M)
Brand: The North Face UPC: 190850544684
Never miss an update

The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d - blurrypron.com

    The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d
    The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d
    VINTAGE DOC DR. MARTENS BOOTS ~ US 6 - 6.5 Brown MustardZARA BLACK FLAT LEATHER ANKLE BOOT WITH CHAIN DETAIL SIZE: US 8AS98 Women`s Biker Boots NEW Black Size 9 , HOGL BOOTS 6.5 Black Leather Boots Size 4 UK US 6.5 HOGL SHEARLING BOOTS 6.5 , Santana Canada Black Italian Leather Knee High Waterproof Boots Size 8 M , Frye Jayden Boots Button Back Brown Leather Riding Stretch Calf Women's Size 8 , NIB HUNTER Hunter Green Original Tall Back Adjustable Rain Boots US 10 UK8Gentlemen/Ladies Womens Doc Martens size 9 Strong heat and wear resistance First quality Preferred boutique , NEW DANSKO Womens Bonita TAUPE Kid Suede Bootie Ankle Boot Size 37/6.5-7 $184.95FRYE Womens Madeline Trim Short Ankle Bootie- Pick SZ/Color.Bed Stu Lorn Ankle Boots Black Handwash Leather size 6.5 Braided BeltWomens 8 M El General 1901 Burgundy White Cut-Out Cowboy Western Boots Leather , VINTAGE CODE WEST 51023 COWHIDE SUEDE COWBOY WESTERN BOOTS WOMEN'S 7.5 M , FRYE 17" KNEE TALL BOOTS GREAT COND FEW TIMES USED 5 MOTORCYCLE MADE IN SPAINGentleman/Lady ECCO Womens Snow Boot- Pick SZ/Color. New varieties are launched Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad Lightweight shoes , New DANNER Mountain Low 600 Women's 8 Gray / Plum Hiking Boot RETAIL 62264 $160PAUL SMITH WOMEN'S RUBBER SWIRL PRINT RAIN BOOTS SIZE US 7.5NIB $298 Frye Celia Shearling Genuine Fur Black Leather Boots sz 7 M , The North Face Womens Shellista II Mid Boot - Dachshund Brown/Demitasse Brown 6FRYE Lindsay Knee High Boots Leather Women's 11 Brown , TORY BURCH Black Leather Block Heel Booties w/ Elastic Sides Sz 8.5Cole Haan Rockland Tall Boots Black Womens Shoes Size 5 M Boots MSRP $300 , GEOX ILLUSION A SMO.LE+SYNT.LE SNEAKERS sale d4454aDonald J Pliner Gisele Napa Stretch Womens Shoes Boots High Black Bootie 8 1/2 M , Womens Dr Martens Pascal Black Virginia Leather 8 Eyelet Ankle Boots Shu SizeTony Bianco $219 DIDDY Black Velvet Booties 8 , Frye Vintage Butterfly Beige W/ Green Cowboy Boots Ladies Size 6.5M , Cole Haan Leather Ankle Boot Size 10 $398 , Donald J Pliner Gisele Napa Stretch Womens Shoes Boots High Black Bootie 6 1/2 M
    The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d - blurrypron.com>The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d - blurrypron.com
    High Sierra Women's Classic 2 Series Explorer 50W Frame Pack Dahlia/Diva SizeMens RM Williams Stockman’s Buckle Boot Size 10G Chestnut (Leather Cleaner Incl)NEW Wide Steps Charity Black Glove SandalNIB - EDDIE BAUER Women's 'SHEARLING MOC SLIPPER' Sand Moccasin Slipper Shoe - 8Sexy Peep Toe Pumps Shoes Stiletto Snakeskin Leather Platform Multi-colored Shoe , I35 Kesya D'Orsay Rhinestone Heels, Champagne, 9 US , NWOB WOMENS RACHEL ZOE BLACK CREAM PATENT LEATHER PLATFORM HEELS SIZE 7Womens - MANOLO BLAHNIK - Stitched Dark Red Patent Leather Heels Pumps 7.5 38Under Armour Create Pro II FG 1208464-141 Soccer Cleats Shoes Men's 8 Futbol newAdidas Torsion ZX FLUX Blue Gray Diamond Flowers Floral Shoes Men’s Size 11 , Nike SB Nyjah Free Shoes - Beach/Sail-Sequoia - Sizes 9-12$120 AIR JORDAN TRUNNER LX 10.5 NAVY BLUE GUM 897992-401NIKE Men's Free Trainer 5.0 V6 White Training Shoe SIZE 13 , ADIDAS LIMITED PREDATOR TANGO 18+TR BOOST BLACK/GOLD-WHITE MNS.SZ.10 (CM7685) , Mizuno Mens Wave Creation 17 Shoes 4106835073 Black , NIKE AIR HUMARA ‘17 ACG BLACK VARSITY MAIZE GREY TRAIL SHOES AJ1102 001 sz 8SAUCONY sneaker shoes man JAZZ ORIGINAL S2044-449 black white , Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 [880555-103] Men Running Shoes White/AnthraciteMan/Woman Air Max 97 Metallic Gold (2018) Great variety International choice ExportSperry Mens Leward 2 Eye Leather Boat shoes Sz 9.5 wide G672 , Polo Ralph Lauren Mens Vaughn Green Fashion Sneakers Sz 11Mr/Ms Ted Baker Men's Xiloto Sneaker elegant Skilled manufacturing Direct businessAnatomic & Co Barbosa Men's Slip On Shoes , Donald J Pliner Mens Braden-23 Slip On Boat Shoes, Red, US 10Men's Sneakers Shoes MOMA 13502-VX Softy White Slip On Beige Vintage Italy NewNike Roshe Two 2 GS Hyper Turquoise White Kids Girls Boys Women Shoes 844655-300 , *NEW!* Onitsuka Tiger Couture Runway Boxing Style Boots Grey Leather US 5.5 RARE , Adidas B37089 EQT Racing ADV Running shoes black white sneakers , Christian Louboutin Chunky Heel Design Pumps 39 1 2 140818 (39763Occident Winter New Chic Synthetic Leather Square Toe Block Heels Mid-Calf Boots ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    The North Face The NWB 15896 Womens Shellista II Tarmac Green Green/Tapenade/Tapenade Green Size 7 5823e7d
    Boots
    >
    ;