Never miss an update

Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: New, store display model. Has minor blemishes due to being a floor model.
Style: Rainboots Brand: Marvin K
Color: Red US Shoe Size (Women's): 37 EUR
UPC: Does not apply
Never miss an update

Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b -

    Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b
    Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b
    Man's/Woman's Giuseppe Zanotti Leather Wedge Booties flagship store Known for its good quality Authentic guarantee , New Franco Russo Black Leather Made in Italy Boots Size 37.5 US 7.5Man's/Woman's Liberty Black Sienna Oiled Boot~ Black Louis, elaborate Cheaper than the price Direct business , Frye Veronica Black Leather Women Slouch Boots Size 6.5 B 4660* , $780 NEW Stella McCartney Crepe Sole Shearling Boots sz 36 / 6 Snow VegetarianAquatalia By Marvin K. Front Zip Up Suede Bootie Black Women Sz 6 4074 * , Etre 619 Gray Leather / Geometric Heel Zip-Up Ankle Boots 37 / US 7 , Albano Women's Italian 829 Ankle Boot, Black , Aquatalia Women's Perforated Suede Tan Ankle Boots 7845 Size 9.5 M $425Alaïa Black Suede Peep Toe Ruffle Accented Sandals Booties Size 39 , FRYE Phillip Harness Tall Leather Boot Black Women Sz 5.5 B 5040 *$1145 EUC TOD'S WOMEN 40 US 10 BROWN LEATHER TALL RIDING EQUESTRIAN BOOTS A9 , Gianfranco Ferre Black Croc Quilted Patent Leather Tall Zippered Boots 39 , Gibellieri m55 Black Stretch Suede Over-the-Knee Heel Boots 36 / US 6Frye Women's Dark Brown Carson Heel Tab Boot 6435 Size 9.5M , Aquatalia By Marvin K. Versus Suede Wedge Ankle Boot Brown Women Sz 10 5191 * , Freebird by Steven Coal boot wine Boho NEW MSRP $350 , Dan Post Women Leather Vintage Bluebird Chocolate - Teal (DP3544) , ECCO Women's Biom Hybrid 2 Golf Shoe - Choose SZ/colorArche Ninote Women's Red Grey Leather Bootie Sz 41 , AERIN NEW IN BOX PORTLEDGE-SPRTSUED BOOTS Color:Camel Size:6M Re:$358+Tax , Women's Wholesale lot Boots Sizes 6-11 18 Pairs SB91014L.K. Bennett London Black Color Solid Suede Pompom Tall Boots Women Size 35 , La Canadienne Marcie Moka Suede Moka Ankle Boots Sz 7 M 4548TALL EQUESTRIAN USA JUSTIN 3071 LEATHER WESTERN COWBOY RANCH WORK BOOTS 5.5 B , Corral Women's Tall Inlay & Studded Boots G1069New Franco Russo Pull-On Black Leather made in Italy Boots Size 39 US 9 , Paul Green Ava Leather Medallion Toe Chelsea Bootie Black Women Sz 6 * , Aquatalia Women's Black France Ankle Bootie 7981 Size 10 New! $425
    Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b ->Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b -
    TOPSHOP Boutique Black Suede Pull On High Heel Ankle Boots Bootie Almond Toe 39 , Stuart Weitzman New Scrunchy Black Womens Shoes Size 7.5 M Boots MSRP $735Ladies Caterpiller/CAT Fur Cuffed Ankle Boots Bruiser ScrunchNew Women's Cute Comfy Ecco "Rise" Black Fabrics Loafers Slip on Shoes Sz. 36 , J. Renee Women's Chesire Low Heel Mule Metallic Multi Leather Slip-on ShoesGiorgio Armani Women's Classic Black Suede Pumps Heels Size 40.5 Nice!LAUREN RALPH LAUREN WOMEN'S IDALIS BLACK ELASTIC UPPER SHOE 9.5B NWB , B BRIAN ATWOOD BAMBOLA Silver Multi Fabric Suede Designer EVENING Pumps 10 , Badgley Mischka Jewel Women's Adela Heeled Sandal - Choose SZ/Color , Nike Huarache 5 V Men's Lacrosse LAX Cleats navy white 807142-410 sz12.5Nike Air Jordan VII Raptors Sz 4y 304774 018 Chicago Bred XI X IX VIII VII V I , Gentleman/Lady Mens Globe (Earth Canvas/Gum) Winslow Shoes Reputation first special promotion Modern modeReebok CM8988 Men Ridgerider Trail 3.0 Running shoes grey blue black sneakers SI , Nike Kaishi (GS) Running Trainers 705489 404 Sneakers Shoes , Nike Air Zoom Spiridon '16 White Team Orange-Black Men's Shoes 926955 106 SZ 10 , GARMONT HURRICANE TRAIL HIKING SHOES MEN'S 9 M FIT 9.5 RTL $130 , Man's/Woman's Jordan Retro 13 Queensland Trendy Caramel, gentleNike Kyrie 3 TB Team Bank "Tuxedo" 917724-001ES K5 ERIC KOSTON 5 NOS 2003 Vintage Skate shoes SUEDE AND LEATHER TRAINERSBRUNO MAGLI BACCARA Gray Leather Dress Boots Mens Size 9.5 M Made in ItalyAriat Men's Sierra Wide Square Steel Toe Work Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Diesel Men's Sneakers Chill Out White/Blue Night Shoes , Columbia Women's Twentythird Ave Waterproof Mid Print Uniform Dress Shoe... , Lacoste Seforra 118 1 U Women's Casual Sneakers Pink 7-35CAW0088PW1 Sz6-9 L , ADIDAS Stella McCartney Ultra Boost Black Grey Sneakers Sz. 8.5Christian Louboutin Louis Orlato Woman Flat Spikes Hawaii Sneakers Euro 39Women's Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 Running Shoes Black/Oil Grey/White 942855 002Women Ankle Boots Blings Sequins Beads Block Heel Pointed Toe Zip Casual Shoes N , Naturalizer Women's Joan Wide Calf Riding Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Born Crown Black Leather upper Knee High Side Zipper Riding Boots Women's Size 9 ,
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Aquatalia by Marvin K. Yen EUR Red Rain 37 Boots 5676 Red Size 37 EUR* aa4098b