Never miss an update

Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff




Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Shoes are in condition and show signs of light wear. Bottom soles are somewhat dirty but tread is not down. Toes of both shoes show light dirt. Insoles and inner lining are slightly dirty from use. Sides of both shoes are pretty clean. Shoes are in otherwise good condition.
Style: Running Shoes Color: Black/Citron/Teal
Sub Style: Road Running Brand: Pearl Izumi
US Shoe Size (Women's): 7.5 UPC: 703051335168
Never miss an update

Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff - blurrypron.com

    Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff
    Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff
    Nike Air Force 1 Hi SE Binary Blue/Muslin-Sail Denim 860544-400 Women's SZ 11.5 , Converse CTAS Hi Sharkskin Grey Womens Hi Top TrainersASICS Roadhawk FF - Women's Dark Grey/Silver/Glacier Sea, 6.5 , Nike Women's Flex Supreme TR 5 Training Shoes Dark Grey Hot Punch Pink SZ 6.5 M , Altra Provision 2 Aqua Blue Coral Women's Athletic Running Shoes Sz 5.5 12 NEWNike 698903-009 Air Max Women's Gray Lava Red Pink Running Athletic Shoes Sz 7Skechers 12765 Black/Charcoal Air Cooled Memory Foam Slip On SneakersNew In Box Women's Nike Flyknit Trainer Chukka 7.5 Crimson Black 805093-603Korean Womens Platform Athletic Shoes Pull On Round Toe Sneakers Hidden Heel HotVans Classic Slip On Platform Black Womens Canvas Low-top Sneakers TrainersNIKE FREE 5.0 WOMEN'S HYPER PUNCH NEW/BOX MULTIPLE SIZES 642199 600 , Ladies Lacoste Helaine Runner Walking Comfortable Fitness Gym Trainers All SizesNIKE Air Zoom Strong Womens Sz 6.5 Shoes Gray Black 843975 100 , WOMENS NIKE LUNARELITE+ 2 CROSS TRAINING RUNNING SHOES/SNEAKERS NEW $100 019 , Womens Fashion Leather Sneakers Sport Sandals Hidden Wedges High Heels Shoes , RARE Puma SKY II HI ROSES Woman's 361699 01 HIGH RISK TRIPLE RED BLACK BOOTS NEWConverse Chuck Taylor All Star II Hi Gold/White-White 555796C Women's SZ 7.5 , Rieker 537A6 Doris A5 Shoe - Women's Size 8.5/9, BlueNew Balance Fresh Foam 1080v7 NYC Marathon Women's Size 6.5 White Gold W1080NK7 , WOMEN'S/JUNIOR SHOES SNEAKERS PUMA SUEDE JR [355110 30]Asics T580N Gel Noosa Tri 10 Purple Green BLue Running Women's Shoes USED Sz 10 , Nike Womens Lunarglide 8 Shoes Black/White Size 7.5 NEW , Nike Huarache Run Sz 6.5 Women's [634835 016] Gum Bottom , Gentleman/Lady Nike Air Rift Liberty QS durable Modern and stylish fashion Vintage tide shoes , New Asics Women's T765N Gel-Contend 4 Running Shoe Sz 7.5 , New Balance NB Womans Running Course Athletic Trainer Shoes sz 6.5,7.5Skechers Women's Kiss - Secret Gray Casual Shoe 8.5 Women Us , Nike WMNS Air Max Invigor Woven Sports Running Shoes Cool Grey Sz 8.5 917544-001 , Puma Fierce Rope Satin En Pointe - Pink - Womens ,
    Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff - blurrypron.com>Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff - blurrypron.com
    Circle G Women's Harness and Studs Ankle Boot - Round Toe - Q5003 , Coconuts by Matisse Women's Lonnie Engineer Boot, Saddle, 9 M US , MENS PUMA BASKET CLASSIC SOFT MEN'S RUNNING/SNEAKERS/TRAINING/TRAINERS SHOESMORI ITALY KNEE HIGH HEEL PLATFORM BOOT STIEFEL STIVALI LEATHER BROWN MARRONE 39Gentlemen/Ladies SMITTEN-01 PU Black Good world reputation Pleasant appearance Strong heat and heat resistance , I35 Kesya D'Orsay Rhinestone Heels 697, Champagne, 6.5 US , Aerosoles Women's Over Drive Slip-On Loafer Black Leather 8 W US , Klogs Natalie Women's Clogs Display Model Shoes Petite Mariposa 9.5 MLuxury womens rhinestone high heel sandals banquet wedding shoes shoes newBritish new women's pearl block low heel patent leather round toe shoes beads szSplendid Women's Dacia Suede Open Toe Stacked Heels AB4 Pearl Size 7 $158Talons hauts model 99638 Zoki - Matter - Shoes , Converse All Star Women High Heel Casual Sneakers Women Lady HI BOA BlakLuca Grossi 669 Gray / White Leather Platform Shoes Mules 35 / US 5NIB Men's Flex RN 2017 Running Shoes Black/Volt/Woft GreyAir Jordan Trunner, White and Red size 10 , Adidas X PLR Dark Blue/Dark Blue-White BB2900 Men's , Adidas EQT Bask Men's size 14 blackNike Air Zoom Structure 21 Men New Burgundy Ash Running Shoes 904695-600 , Nike Shoes Men's 10.5 Brown Beige Silver Flynet Hyperfeel Running 2003 VintageADIDAS TWINSTRIKE A/D - ITEM NUMBER 1129-55 , Cole Haan Men's Colton Winter Chukka Boot - Choose SZ/Color , Ahnu Montara II Women's Black Hiking Shoe 7M , Reebok Size 7.5 Wide Running Sneakers New WomensNIKE DUNK HIGH VINTAGE 2008 HALLOWEEN GLOW BATS PREMIUM 4.5Y / WOMENS 6 NIB NEW , NEW Nike Lunarglide 8 Shield VIII Women's Running Shoes 849569-400 Size 5 , Reebok Fusion Flexweave Women's Tin Grey/Shark/Spirit White CN2858 , Ahnu Womens Sugarpine Hiking Boot- Pick SZ/Color.FRANCO SARTO EDEN WOMENS BROWN LEATHER ANKLE HEEL BOOTS 9.5 NEW , Womens Thicken Fur Lined Winter Large Fur Trim Warm Snow Over the Knee Boots Hot
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff - blurrypron.com

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff - blurrypron.com

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.

    Conclusion

    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?

     

    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    Pearl Izumi EM Size Road M 2 EM v2 Running 2 Shoes, Women's Size 7.5, Black/Citron/Teal f76d3ff
    Athletic Shoes
    >
    ;