Never miss an update

JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Condition of the Item in Description..
Brand: Jil Sander Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up)
Style: Stilettos Material: Leather
US Shoe Size (Women's): 9.5/ 10 Pattern: Solids
Color: Brown Country of Manufacture: Italy
Never miss an update

JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -

    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80
    Nina Womens Crystah Peep Toe D-orsay Pumps, Steel Satin, Size 7.5 T5zS , Women Europe Stiletto High Heel Platform PU Leather Spring Europe Shoes Plus Sz , Cole Haan Womens Amela Grand Pump Pointed Toe, gunmetal glitter, Size 8.0 , Fashion Womens High Wedge Girls Sandals Comfort Platform Bow Ankle Strap ShoesSTUART WEITZMAN Bright Red Patent Leather Pump Heels Bow Gold Chain 7.5M Italy , Womens Patent Leather Platform Stilettos High Heel Ankle Boots Shoes Ballet Ch18Thalia Sodi Womens Telmaf Peep Toe SlingBack Platform PumpsMarc Fisher Women's Dalanna Pump, Cabernet, Size 7.5 D6JSDesigned By Kristin Cavallari Chinese Laundry Dani Suede Pump , Fashion Women's Hip Hops Ankle Boots Platform OL High Heels Zipper Shoes Sz35-39 , Brighton Womens Tweed Black Gray Pointy Spool Heel Mules Shoes US 7.5Sexy Womens Pumps High Heels Nightclub Platform Ankle Strap Snakeskin Shoes Size , Ladies Patent Leather High Heel Pointy Toe Shoes Classic Stiletto Pumps ShoesSexy 3" Kitten Heel Round Toe Criss-Cross Mary Jane Lavender Pumps ShoesLadies Europe Pointy Toe Hollow BowKnot Med Heel Mule Slippers Sandals Stilettos , Jon Josef Shoes Heels Pumps Brown Gold Trim Suede Spain Womens Size 8 M , Women's Transparent Platform 15CM High Heel Open Toe Sandals Nightclub Shoes BarChic Ladies Wedge High Heels Buckle Strap Floral Casual shoes Lolita Casual Shoe , Womens Rhinestone Wedding Shoes Ball Gown Bling Crystal Wedge High Heels YoooMarc Fisher LTD Keisha Heel - Women's Size 7M Black , Steve Madden Black Pony Pumps/Heels size 10 , Fashion Womens Square Toe Block Chunky High Heel Bowknot Classic Pumps Shoes SzSam Edelman Lorissa Black Leather Studs Spike Peep Toe Pumps Heels Womens US 8.5Ladies 18cm Super High Heel Dance Sexy Ballet Knee Boots Stiletto Clubwear ShoesLAUREN by Ralph Lauren Womens Hala Leather Closed Toe Classic, Grey, Size 11.0 rMarc Fisher Holiday Womens Size 8.5 Pink Open Toe Fabric Wedge Sandals Shoes , Schutz Juliana Pewter Aco Metallic Glitter Stiletto High Heel Caged Sandals Pump , Vogue Womens Suede Open Toe Sandal Metal T-Strap High Wedge Heel Rivet Zip ShoesFashion Womens Casual Low Heels Ankle Strappy Leather Work Pumps Mary Janes Size ,
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 ->JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -
    Donald J Pliner Vayghn Brown Womens Shoes Size 6 M Boots MSRP $298 , Frye Renee Women's taupe leather western booties sz. 6.5 MFirst Tactical Men's 8" Composite Toe Size Zip Tactical/Police/Swat Duty BootsACERBIS 0017934.318.035 BOOTS SHARK BABY BLACK/YELLOW T.35ADIDAS NMD CS2 PK Unisex Running Shoes Sneakers Size 4-11 Grey BA7187 , Skechers Women's Go Walk 3 Shoe Black , NEW Alegria OLI-631 Olivia Dusty Black sandal shoes size 40 , Easy Spirit Women's Jaiva Mule Taupe Suede 10 M USCLARKS Women's Asney Slipon Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorSperry Top Sider Womens A/O 2 - Eye Black Gold Foil Boat Shoes Size 6 M Eur 36Naturalizer Delanie Womens Leather Comfortable Heeled Sandals , Bally Heels Brown Leather Penny Loafer Women 8 MCOLE HAAN GRAND OS Women's BEIGE PATENT PUMPS Shoes SIZE 10B D41948 , Man's/Woman's BALENCIAGA Shoes 318323 Brown 37 quality online shop Very practical , Womens J. CREW stylish pink patent leather flip flops shoes sz. 9 M NEW! , Vans VINTAGE MILITARY Slip-On 138 Canvas Khaki Shoes Sneakers - VN0A3TKBMHN , Gentlemen/Ladies Adidas ZX Flux PK High quality and cheap Ranked first in its class Exquisite (processing) processing , NIKE Vapor Speed Turf Pink Black Football Training Shoes Sneakers Mens 12.5 17 , Mens Cognac Alligator Tail Pattern Leather Motorcycle Harness Boots Square Toe , Tuk T.U.K viva creeper low sole black suede V7270 Mens 6 women's size 8MERRELL MENS ENCORE REXTON SLIDE LEATHER AC+ BLACK SIZE 11.5 , New Kensington Classics Wing Cap Brogue Gibson Tan Mens Shoes ALL SIZES , Nike TANJUN Womens Anthracite Blue 812655 006 Athletic Running Training ShoesNIKE ROSHE TWO FLYKNIT V2 RUNNING SHOES GRAY WOMENS 6 NEW 917688-002 , Bearpaw Women's Savannah High Top Sneaker Dove Grey Microsuede SneakersNike Metcon 4 Womens 924593-006 Light Pumice Vast Grey Training Shoes Size 5.5Indigo Rd. Women's Custom Fashion Boot, Black, 6.5 M USVolatile Blix Women's Size 8 Khaki Green Suede Woven Booties Tassel Back Zip New , WOMEN punk square toe patent leather chain block chunky heel cuban shoes stylishFashion Women Leopard Knight Shoes Nightclub Over Knee Thigh Boots High Platform
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80