Never miss an update

JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Condition of the Item in Description..
Brand: Jil Sander Heel Height: High (3 in. and Up)
Style: Stilettos Material: Leather
US Shoe Size (Women's): 9.5/ 10 Pattern: Solids
Color: Brown Country of Manufacture: Italy
Never miss an update

JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -

    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80
    Nina Womens Crystah Peep Toe D-orsay Pumps, Steel Satin, Size 7.5 T5zSWomen Europe Stiletto High Heel Platform PU Leather Spring Europe Shoes Plus SzCole Haan Womens Amela Grand Pump Pointed Toe, gunmetal glitter, Size 8.0 , Fashion Womens High Wedge Girls Sandals Comfort Platform Bow Ankle Strap Shoes , STUART WEITZMAN Bright Red Patent Leather Pump Heels Bow Gold Chain 7.5M ItalyWomens Patent Leather Platform Stilettos High Heel Ankle Boots Shoes Ballet Ch18Thalia Sodi Womens Telmaf Peep Toe SlingBack Platform PumpsMarc Fisher Women's Dalanna Pump, Cabernet, Size 7.5 D6JSDesigned By Kristin Cavallari Chinese Laundry Dani Suede PumpFashion Women's Hip Hops Ankle Boots Platform OL High Heels Zipper Shoes Sz35-39Brighton Womens Tweed Black Gray Pointy Spool Heel Mules Shoes US 7.5Sexy Womens Pumps High Heels Nightclub Platform Ankle Strap Snakeskin Shoes Size , Ladies Patent Leather High Heel Pointy Toe Shoes Classic Stiletto Pumps ShoesSexy 3" Kitten Heel Round Toe Criss-Cross Mary Jane Lavender Pumps Shoes , Ladies Europe Pointy Toe Hollow BowKnot Med Heel Mule Slippers Sandals Stilettos , Jon Josef Shoes Heels Pumps Brown Gold Trim Suede Spain Womens Size 8 MWomen's Transparent Platform 15CM High Heel Open Toe Sandals Nightclub Shoes BarChic Ladies Wedge High Heels Buckle Strap Floral Casual shoes Lolita Casual ShoeWomens Rhinestone Wedding Shoes Ball Gown Bling Crystal Wedge High Heels Yooo , Marc Fisher LTD Keisha Heel - Women's Size 7M BlackSteve Madden Black Pony Pumps/Heels size 10 , Fashion Womens Square Toe Block Chunky High Heel Bowknot Classic Pumps Shoes SzSam Edelman Lorissa Black Leather Studs Spike Peep Toe Pumps Heels Womens US 8.5Ladies 18cm Super High Heel Dance Sexy Ballet Knee Boots Stiletto Clubwear Shoes , LAUREN by Ralph Lauren Womens Hala Leather Closed Toe Classic, Grey, Size 11.0 rMarc Fisher Holiday Womens Size 8.5 Pink Open Toe Fabric Wedge Sandals ShoesSchutz Juliana Pewter Aco Metallic Glitter Stiletto High Heel Caged Sandals PumpVogue Womens Suede Open Toe Sandal Metal T-Strap High Wedge Heel Rivet Zip Shoes , Fashion Womens Casual Low Heels Ankle Strappy Leather Work Pumps Mary Janes Size ,
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 ->JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -
    Nike Air Force 1 Ultra Force Lthr Mens Trainers 845052 Sneakers Shoes 202Adrianna Papell Lois Dress Kitten Pumps 806, Black Floral, 6.5 USMe Too Women's Halle Dark Alpaca Tumbled Metallic Flat , NIB Hotter Women’s Blue River Leather Nirvana Mary Jane Shoe Loafer Size 6.5 $83Softspots Sarah Flats Womens 9 W Navy Saddle Pumps Comfort Dress Shoes Low Heel , OTBT Women's Brentsville Cement Leather Comfort Shoes , 41324 auth ACNE SUTDIOS black leather Pointed-Toe Ballet Flats Shoes 38 , VANELi Womens nadim Leather Closed Toe Boat Shoes , Tsubo Honnor Ballet Flats Round Toe Embossed Suede Silver Metallic 41/ 10 NewTory Burch Studded Slingback Clog Mule * 5.5 * Wood Heels Brown Leather WomensReef Women's Girls Walled Low Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/ColorNEW BALANCE 510v3 510 Mens 4E Wide Width Trail Running MT590RP3 NEWNew Balance TBTBBN D Trailbuster Burgundy Purple Gum Men Running Shoes TBTBBND , Nike Men's Lebron Soldier 10 SFG LUX BasketBall Shoes Size 7 to 13 us 911306 001Nike Zoom Lebron 2 II SVSM Sz 11.5 Promo Sample St Vincent St Mary's Vii BAM I XLebron X Ext QS Size 8.5 Deadstock 100% authentic!Man's/Woman's Air Jordan 2011 - 436771 002 fashion Reliable performance Very good classification , Mr/Ms Donald J Pliner Men's ABEL Sneaker the most convenient Beautiful appearance A balance between toughness and hardnessDanner Men’s Pronghorn 8” Uninsulated Hunting BootBrown11.5 D US , Caterpillar JED Oxford Mens Work Casual Trainers Tmoro Nubuck Shoes SneakersMens Leather Metal Toe Shoes Slip On Dress Loafers Oxfords Formal Work CasualConverse Womens 5 Hightop Aqua Butterfly Ctashi HiNew Merrell Women's Solo Fashion Sneakers Size 9m Wild Dove Forget J03544Nike Women's Air Tech Challenge 2 SE Stadium Green / Volt 857879-301 SZ 6 , Nike WMNS Roshe One BR Running Shoes White/Metallic Platinum Sz 7.5 724850-100 , Nike Air Max 1 White Black Running Training Womens Shoes [319986 109] Size 10Topo Athletic Women's ST-2 Running Shoe Black/Raspberry 12Man's/Woman's NEW DOCKSTEPS WOMENS ANKLE BOOTS Beautiful design excellent Recommended today , Womens Gladiator Knee Thigh Boots Cut Out Belt Buckle Leather Flat Shoes Sandals , Eileen Fisher Murphy Storm Nubuck Leather Ankle Booties Boots 6.5, 7, 8, 10
    Will ETFs cause the next market crash?
    ETF Watch - Jun 29, 2017
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -

    There’s no doubt that the last 2 years has seen the coming of age of ETFs. With what was once an unknown type of investment quickly becoming a $30b industry in Australia ($3 trillion globally). However, as ETFs have moved from the unknown to the flavour of the month, an increasing number of commentators have called on the risks ETF investors face, with some even stating that ETFs will be the source of the next market crash. Today we take a look at some of the claims as to why some believe there are so many risks associated with ETFs.

    Claim 1: ETFS are blindly pushing up stock prices

    Many have written about share markets being at record highs. In an interview with the AFR, Wilson Asset Management chief Geoff Wilson discussed his portfolios’ current high weightings to cash due to concerns of market over-valuations. 

    US based fund manager FPA capital called ETFs “Weapons of Mass Destruction”and stated “The flood of money into passive products is making stock prices move in lockstep and creating markets increasingly divorced from underlying fundamentals”. The argument they make is as ETFs blindly invest in stocks in their chosen index and ignore the underlying fundamentals of these companies. This causes these companies prices to be bid up to prices that do not support their fundamentals (ie a bubble), and eventually history repeats, the bubble bursts and markets crash.

    What do we think?

    ETFs account for around 10% of US stocks’ market value and less than 1% in Australia. In the US at least this is not an immaterial amount. However, the active managers whom ETFs have taken business from generally have mandates which force them to invest a certain percentage in the market. As a result, active managers have always been investing in expensive markets and pushing up prices. Additionally, what is currently called by many analysis as expensive equity markets could also be attributed to global record low interest rates rather than an uptick in passive investing. In saying that, since the last major market crash (the 2008 GFC), the proportion of total assets in ETFs are considerably higher and continual growth of passive investing must be considered as a possible cause of markets becoming expensive.

    Recently we’ve seen Vaneck reweight their huge Junior Gold Miner’s ETF as they approached 20% limits in some of their smaller holdings. This meant selling out of these small gold miners which saw large falls in some of these shares (some of which was blamed on hedge funds looking to capitalise on the opportunity). This is a great example of the influence that ETFs can have, albeit this is at the small end of the market.

    Claim 2: ETFs will sell on mass and compound market falls

    One of the known weaknesses of a managed fund structure is the ability for investors to fairly easily redeem their funds, meaning at times of market falls, when a fund manager may find the best investment opportunities, the investors in the fund are panicking and redeeming their investments, meaning the fund manager becomes a forced seller rather than a buyer. This was one of the reasons Forager decided to turn their Australian Share Fund (FOR) into a Listed Investment Trust, where the pool of capital for them to invest was guaranteed.

    The one thing stopping simple redemption of managed funds during market crashes is another one of its weaknesses, which is managed funds are not simple to trade, and require the investor to apply to the fund to redeem units. This can involve filling out paper forms, and an apathetic investor may simply not be bothered.

    What do we think?

    One of the greatest advantages of ETFs is also one of its weaknesses when it comes to the above, with ETFs able to be traded on the ASX, a panicked investor simply has to log into their online brokerage account and hit the sell button. If a buyer does not exist on the other side of the trade, the ETF issuer is forced to then sell the underlying holdings which could very well begin a contagion effect.

    However, we come back to the size of the ETF market, at around 1% of the Australian market and 10% of the US market. Investors selling underlying stocks that they own through their broker will have the exact same impact as the reasonably small proportion of ETFs. We believe the actual impact of this event would be not materially higher than what currently exists.

    Claim 3: ETFS with low liquidity will be hard to sell if markets fall

    Peter Switzer recently spoke about a client who had received advice that an ETF with low liquidity would be difficult to sell if markets fall. The argument being that without a liquid market the seller would be unable to find a buyer on the other side of the trade and would need to sell at a significant discount.

    What do we think?

    One of the somewhat unknown components of ETFs is the role of the market maker. Essentially the market maker’s role is to provide liquidity to an ETF, so that if there is not an existing ETF unit on the other side of an ETF trade, the market maker must create an ETF unit for a buyer, or absorb an ETF unit for a seller. It is then the ETF issuer's role to buy or sell the underlying assets that the ETF holds. This means that regardless of an ETF’s liquidity, a market maker will always exist to buy an ETF off an investor even if the markets in free fall.

    However, there is a caveat to the above. Market makers make a profit by charging a spread between the buy price and the sell price of an ETF. The spread becomes the market maker’s profit margin. In a free falling market it may be difficult for the market maker to price the underlying investments forcing them to create a huge spread between the buy and sell price to protect their margins. This was seen in the 2015 Dow Jones ‘Flash Crash’, where some ETFs dropped 30% when the market makers were unable to price the underlying securities.

    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80 -

    Finally, an ETF is only ever as liquid as its underlying holdings. ETFs which invest in illiquid investments may have great liquidity, but if the underlying investments do not, this will likely be reflected in falls in both the underlying holdings and the ETF during market falls. This may be more likely to play out at the small cap end of the sharemarket and within unlisted asset classes.

    Claim 4: ‘Exotic’ ETFs are higher risk

    In a recent RBA publication, economist Michelle Cunningham discussed the risks faced with some of the more exotic ETFs, those that are classed as ‘synthetic’ ETFs, meaning the ETF issuer does not hold the underlying investments, rather they rely on a counterparty to pay the return. These ETFs are generally referred to as ‘Synthetic’ or ‘Hedge fund’ in their title. Cunningham raised the risk that the counterparty may default on their obligation, so an additional level of risk exists for the investor.

    What do we think?

    We agree with Cunningham’s analysis, an additional level of risk certainly exists with these ETF structures, however in many cases this is the only way to access to investment strategy that the ETF provides. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of the additional risks that exist.


    There’s plenty of arguments in both camps about ETFs role in future market crashes. There’s no doubt the world has moved into uncharted territory with the rise of passive investing & ETFs in particular. We do believe, however, that some of the risks are overblow. Nevertheless, investors should be aware of these risks in order to make informed investing decisions. What do you think?


    Previous Article

    2017 Financial Year ETF and LIC Performance Table

    Next Article

    New Fixed Interest ETFs expand options for investors

    Leave a Reply
    Find a Fund
    JIL SANDER LEATHER 21059 MARY JANE/2 STYLE HEELS SHOES SZ mogochinese-21060/2 40/ US 9 1/2 10 5e5db80